AOL outages and service status in West Grove, Pennsylvania

Problems in the last 24 hours in West Grove, Pennsylvania

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in West Grove, Pennsylvania and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near West Grove, Pennsylvania

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in West Grove and nearby locations:

• 
  Danger Manley (@DangerManley) reported 48 minutes ago from North Star, Delaware

  Hahaha 😂 I knew that AOL (!) mail was still around, but I thought that Yahoo mail had been shut down for years...

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Laserkid is now an uncle! (@laserkidprime) reported 2 minutes ago

  @Tsukento Oh man I never did use the AOL site as I was a filthy Earthlinker, but I was in the Loudhouse as early as 1995 (under the same username hilariously I've kept it the same going back to 1994 and WBS Chat, also long gone)

• 
  Chrissy (@mschrissynicole) reported 7 minutes ago

  Just saw an ad from yahoo….i didn’t even know we still had yahoo…good for them damn. I remember when I had a yahoo email address. Everyone else had aol and hotmail but my dad wouldn’t let me bc he thought I was too young (aka he was stricked) so I snuck and got a yahoo email.

• 
  Chris Farrell (@chrispfarrell) reported 10 minutes ago

  I think OpenAI and Anthropic might be the CompuServe and AOL of the AI era. Does anyone actually think Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Apple, Meta, Oracle, IBM, X/Twitter, and all of the other big tech companies will just allow these 2 badly run startups to capture the AI market? OpenAI and Anthropic don't have a moat or sustainable competitive advantage. To win they have to not only develop a moat but penetrate some of the most fortified moats. Model quality isn't a moat. Kimi, Grok, Deepseek proved that. Inference will become a commodity utility that requires massive CapEx that neither can finance. Interface is where the moat is the weakest. OpenAI and Anthropic do not own the apps or the OS. The OS and apps are owned by parties who view OpenAI or Anthropic as threats, and they can complicate things very easily. As if that is not grim enough, AI sovereignty will become an issue. Consumers will want their iCloud data to stay in iCloud, their OneDrive data to stay in OneDrive, etc. Enterprise customers will want AI from their cloud providers to reduce egress and for performance + IP reasons. It is honestly hard to imagine a world where OpenAI and Anthropic survive as they are. They will either morph into companies with entirely different value offerings or die like Compuserve and AOL.

• 
  Donna (she/her/y'all, the most inclusive pronoun) (@ContessDonatela) reported 10 minutes ago

  @Ranulf_84 @lady_valor_07 No, I KNOW you are wrong. Internet as devised using hypertext was developed betw 1991 & 1993 when www. * was fully rolled out as I said, BUT all of it was there before hypertext. Standalones like AOL, etc, began 1983-85, IDIOT!!!!

• 
  Greg Manuel (He/Him: GIFT SHOP IN BIO!) (@WriterComicNYer) reported 11 minutes ago

  @KydJustice If AOL/Time Warner wanted to keep wrestling on their network, nothing happening in WCW at the time would have mattered. Brooks is full of ****.

• 
  𝔸𝕔𝕖♠️🇳🇬☠️ 3 KINGS WILL RISE🇧🇫🇳🇪🇲🇱👑👑👑 (@JohnnyACE562) reported 12 minutes ago

  @Ghfg32290189 Why not? Every merger they get into goes bad for a reason. AOL? AT&T? Discovery? Now this.

• 
  Michael Dorbuck (@mikedorb1) reported 14 minutes ago

  @CZOctober25 @SarahSevans2000 I never had a waterbed or AOL either but the rest of them I had or used at one point. My first Internet was dial up and it drove people crazy. Because I had only one phone line and people would try to call me on the phone and the line was always busy because I was on the Internet

• 
  l0n0⚡👁 (@AdventureDr) reported 16 minutes ago

  @MrHodl People are just stupid a lot of the time. That guys been a train wreck almost from moment 1. An ego driven pervert. Basically he would of fit in well during the hight of AOL.........

• 
  Sabretooth | Exchequer (@SabretoothSG) reported 16 minutes ago

  Crypto has hit a local maxima, like the internet did in 1998. How you monetize currently in crypto is to clip trading volume. The users doing volume are traders. so everything ships for traders, perps, options, CEXes, dexes, launchpads, etc... Build for traders and you get instant traction. build for anyone else and you get crickets, so the traction data says traders are the only market, and the capital follows the traction data. in 1998 every serious internet company was a portal. Yahoo, Excite, Lycos, AOL, Infoseek. the metric was traffic. Everything was built to keep the user on the page, because the user on the page was the business. Search was actively deprioritized. A good search engine sends the user away, which is negative stickiness, which made search a bad product. In 1999 Excite passed on buying Google for under a million dollars. In 2000 Yahoo hired Google to power its own search results, because search was a cost center you outsourced. We are in the portal era of crypto. The Google of crypto will not show immediate traction. Google didn't. It sent users away, made no money, and looked like a toy to every smart person grading it on 1998's metric. If you want immediate traction, the market has plenty for you. Go find the next pump fun. The next Aster. The next shiny thing traders rotate into for three weeks. The next big thing requires conviction about what crypto is for, not what does volume in the next 30 days.

• 
  ySo (@SupremerZ) reported 17 minutes ago

  @JohnHolbein1 AOL mail must be the damn boomers destroying the country