AOL outages and service status in Summerville, South Carolina
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
- AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Summerville, including 0 direct reports.
AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.
Problems in the last 24 hours in Summerville, South Carolina
The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Summerville, South Carolina and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
AOL Issues Reports Near Summerville, South Carolina
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Summerville and nearby locations:
-
Danny Garnette (@garnetterd) reported from Summerville, South Carolina@AOLSupportHelp I am having problems this morning trying to get into my sol mail account.
-
Danny Garnette (@garnetterd) reported from Summerville, South Carolina@AOLSupportHelp I am having problems this morning trying to get into my aol mail account.
AOL Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Kumalovi📺 (@Bear_lovi) reportedBecause I know my Facebook password but why ******** would you give a AOL account and a lookout account when I don’t know the password to them
-
Dr. David Burkus (@davidburkus) reportedWSJ profiled Bending Spoons this week — the Milan company that owns AOL, Evernote, and Vimeo, run by executives in their 30s and staffed by people who are sometimes younger than the software they've been hired to fix. It's actually a story about why so many applicants never make it through the door. Hundreds of thousands apply every year — enough that the rejection rate makes Harvard look like an easy yes — and most of them are optimizing for the wrong thing: credentials, polish, a great answer to "tell me about yourself." Almost anyone can be gracious to the person deciding their future. It's how they treat someone who can't do anything for them that's hard to fake. Last year: roughly 800,000 applications, 286 hires, an acceptance rate near 0.04% — tighter than Citadel's famously selective quant recruiting (0.36%), something like a hundred times harder than Harvard. That selectivity isn't a gut call. A dedicated team inside the company grades every interview against fixed criteria, then tracks how each hire performs months and years later, feeding the results back into the model. CEO Luca Ferrari has said the signal his team weights hardest is exactly this — how a candidate treats the people who have zero power over the outcome: the assistant, the receptionist. Not decency theater. Data: how you act in front of power is a performance; how you act in front of none is closer to the truth. That gap gets coded straight into the model, right alongside the interview scores. I'd bet you've done the reverse of this in the last week without noticing — warm with your boss, a little short with someone who couldn't do anything for you either way. Most companies say they hire for character. Very few test it anywhere the candidate isn't being watched by someone who can help them. Worth trying on your own team — just notice who's kind to the person who can't do anything for them.
-
Reinhold Thomas Mueller (@Reinhold2108) reported@ohhanxiety Never used AOL
-
AcePorkins (@AcePorkins) reported@SarahSevans2000 19, somehow never had an AOL address. I think I skipped straight to yahoo or Hotmail.
-
John Drouin (@John_Drew65) reported@SarahSevans2000 18, never had an AOL address or a waterbed
-
Milo (@MstrMilo) reportedBeen going down a Luca Ferrari rabbit hole and honestly the guy might be running one of the smartest plays in tech right now. while everyone's out here trying to build the next big thing, he's just buying the old ones. Evernote, WeTransfer, Vimeo, Meetup, AOL. products people still love but that got bloated and neglected. bending spoons scoops them up cheap because everyone assumes they're dead. they're not, they're just badly run. and then the fun part. they move everything to italy, strip the company way down, hand the code to a bunch of young engineers who ship like crazy, and reprice the product to what it's actually worth. evernote got 75 updates in a year after basically going quiet. nobody's on call, everyone's just a "software engineer," salaries are flat. someone described it as private equity having a baby with google which is perfect. the numbers are kind of insane too. revenue per employee went from about $1.1m to $2.6m in two years, and they just IPO'd north of $18b and popped 40% on the first day. the takeaway that stuck with me: you don't have to invent the thing. you can just take something great that someone else fumbled and actually run it well. everyone's obsessed with zero to one and he's quietly getting rich on one to n.
-
Barbara Ann Johnson For US President 2028 (@chicksinger77) reportedWe cannot organize online. They have aol our devices hacked. We cannot organize, irl, they are the police force that will use energy weapons. Just. Be. Cool. And. Evolve. Into. Your. Anti-Christ. Shield. They NEED you to bow down to their frequency, and feed it. Don’t.
-
Ben Monroe 🇺🇦 🇹🇼 (@BenMonroe1) reported@SarahSevans2000 Hit 19, I never had an AOL address, I could have but I didn't. A lot of those are the result of working in a law office though.
-
Gooboberti (@Gooboberti) reported@RaminNasibov America Online (AOL) Thrust upon us from all angles, for free. Hard to cancel. Free CDs everywhere.
-
Sara K. Eisen (@SarKE) reported@xwanyex Yes. Very much this. I remember my first post-college job in mid/late 90s, bored between faxes I was sending for my boss at a large non profit (kids this is all true and not satire.) On ICQ, pre AOL acquisition, I was chatting w someone in Tasmania (a pilot, he claimed) and another person, a professor from South UK, who told me to listen to Rodrigo. This was still before you could send graphic files so everyone was an avatar and words unless you put a photograph in an envelope and mailed it. I ended up writing a novel when a startup I’d just joined closed in mid 2000, about how relationships and communication would and have changed in this new texting world. Never published it because “some people did some things” in 2001 and agents only wanted non fiction, and then I lost the drive. Thank you for coming to my TED walk down memory lane.