1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. AOL
  4. Knoxville
AOL

AOL outages and service status in Knoxville, Tennessee

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map
  • AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Knoxville, including 0 direct reports.

AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.

Problems in the last 24 hours in Knoxville, Tennessee

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Knoxville, Tennessee and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Knoxville, Tennessee

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Knoxville and nearby locations:

  • superpixels
    Victor Agreda Jr (@superpixels) reported from Knoxville, Tennessee

    @pkafka Literally every carrier has been beefing up their content acquisitions for years (I was laid off when VZW acquired AOL). They seem to be hoping exclusive content (the old AOL model) will drive customer retention.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • KSD1968
    Kevin S. Davis (@KSD1968) reported

    @MapQuest Lemme find an AOL CD and file a complaint.

  • OlivierGroot
    Olivier Groot (@OlivierGroot) reported

    @theamelia___ 18 but only as there was no AOL in NL and a waterbed is something I never understood

  • JennaMeshelle
    Jenna (@JennaMeshelle) reported

    @PCSoonersFan Those damn AOL chat rooms lmaooooo 😭

  • Zakksu
    Zak🇵🇸BRING VALKO BACK☄Get Legacy Cast in FF7R🌸 (@Zakksu) reported

    @nasykuching Back in the 90s when I had AOL dial up I used to print all the fanfics I wanted to read offline bcuz our landline phone was always used by my mom to call family overseas So I think printing them out for personal use shouldn't be a problem so long as you aren't trying to profit🤔

  • MayorExperience
    Joshua T Berglan (@MayorExperience) reported

    Starlink, MTN, and Orange are all terrible today in Cameroon. I can’t even get a connection on MTN or Orange, and Starlink is running like 1990s dial-up. I used to log into AOL faster than a webpage loads on Starlink right now. Isn't there supposed to be a Blood Moon tonight? Not that any other blood moon I’ve been a part of changed anything, but TikTok has me convinced I’ll wake up on a new timeline tomorrow.

  • DaniilBuilds
    Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported

    AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.

  • RakeshSFNYC
    Rakesh Agrawal (@RakeshSFNYC) reported

    Beyond the usual senior leadership problems at AOL that doomed Mapquest, there was another: channel conflict. Mapquest had a LOB that was store locators. They would sell widgets to retailers and other businesses that they could put on their own sites. Split personalities like that are always tough. When one side is paying the bills (store locator) it's hard to ship the future.

  • joubalspacker
    joubalspacker (@joubalspacker) reported

    @thenarr47271717 @Bit_Faced @theswansjr Your analogy is a bit off Current Bitcoin is not 'The Internet' but more akin to the walled garden of America Online capable of serving only a select few... AOL was consumed by the wider permissionless network that served everybody... If BTC can only serve the masses via custodians it will be no different than a CBDC => It will be outcompeted by a freer money

  • Red_Devil1208
    Read Only Mode (@Red_Devil1208) reported

    @MapQuest Hahahaha this is like AOL screaming in 2026 they aren’t going to use AI or some ****. Like no one cares what you do because no one uses you anymore.

  • DirkDaknife
    Daknife (@DirkDaknife) reported

    @brockpierson Best of all were the PackardHell Combo sound card and modem, which would literally have IRQ conflicts with itself! I spent many a long call (AOL Tech Support in 96-98) trying to find a combination that a particular machine would accept.