AOL outages and service status in Euless, Texas

Problems in the last 24 hours in Euless, Texas

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Euless, Texas and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Euless, Texas

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Euless and nearby locations:

• 
  Pablo Panda (@SaintPablo93) reported 5 minutes ago from Irving, Texas

  This lady still uses AOL gah damn.

• 
  G. Hoüze (@ChefHoneyWood) reported 22 minutes ago from Grapevine, Texas

  @darkpinkdivine The aol feels heavy now and it’s moving hella slow. Lol

• 
  FiftyShadesB (@FiftyShadesB) reported 27 minutes ago from Irving, Texas

  @UntouchableC1 **** around and have AOL get in on it 😂😂😂😂😂😂

• 
  Braid-Tug (@BraidTug) reported 40 minutes ago from Bedford, Texas

  @HagneSanti @brother_Buddha @MarcelleX It has some history from the AoL not in the books. Is more a culture read. Less encyclopedia. Also, disappointing art. Artist got rushed by contract changes. So I feel bad for them, but still don't like the character art.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Bill Bishop (@niubi) reported 7 minutes ago

  This pro-PRC model industry group from Silicon Valley is interesting but I think not thinking long-term. Why can’t the frontier labs do something like AOL did with its Greenhouse project and say OK, I will let you distill but we want equity in your company and/or a fee. AOL got equity for promotion/placement on the screen. (we committed 30+ million at MarketWatch, helped traffic and the ipo a lot, but worst company I have ever negotiated with). Anyway, apologies for the digression, but why couldn’t this be similar but for distillation access, and the labs like Anthropic and OpenAI could end up with a really interesting portfolio of companies, some of which might become quite valuable, and those smaller firms’ VCs could also benefit? Otherwise, does it really make sense for a huge swathe of the American technology industry to end up dependent on PRC models? Haven’t we learned any lessons from other industries where PRC firms have been able to come in at a very low cost with good products and effectively create dependencies that crowd at all other competitors? And now we are talking about the most transformative industry in many years, and it could be even worse if it’s built in part through some problematic practices in terms of distillation attacks and export control violations, if some of US government’s and frontier labs’ claims are true?

• 
  Sergio Vengeance 🇺🇲🎮🤘 (@SergioVengeance) reported 11 minutes ago

  @JoelKatz @RealZaikTorek @Awk20000 Not to mention the very first big section 230 case was about AOL and them being too slow to censor a malicious troll who was spreading confirmed lies that led to harassment. So even if the argument is "the website didn't censor this" then that's a core Section 230 argument.

• 
  Poopeye™ (@ThePoopeye) reported 12 minutes ago

  How do all these people have 10s of thousands of "followers"? People that don't necessarily post anything new or just re-posts of other peoples' thoughts & work. I don't get it. I've been a member for a while now (w/ THIS acct - my orig was cancelled by Twitter during COVID for telling the factual scientific truth about masks based on my years in Bio-Nanotechnology). Is it strictly from those "Follow" train lists? I learned early on to stay away from those - I check out EVERYBODY I ever follow first & personally (not necessarily relying upon Grok's "Profile Summary", although those may get me interested to take a gander). I try to engage those who engage with me and avoid silly flame-wars. I don't post to GET followers, I generally post current stream-of-consciousness thoughts, what's on my mind at that moment & not really organizing them into proper English "articles". Plus I'm not really good at pithy comments - I speak from my heart & soul and EXPLAIN myself & my reasoning for coming to different conclusions. And I typically don't engage in irrational, emotional hyperbole & name-calling. I truly want to know what others think and LEARN (you're never too old to learn!). For DECADES on BBSes (Bulletin Board Systems - pre-graphical internet days, modem-connected social systems for discussion, research & debates), the Usenets (newsgroups, pre-graphical/HTTP/HTML internet days when time on the internet was purchased through 3rd party vendors like CompuServe by the hour - 70s & 80s, pre-AOL (which is slightly pre-HTTP/HTML/Mozilla-Netscape graphical internet revolution) - where everything was command-line driven in ASCII, EBCDIC, ISO set or ATASCII or the like). Am I just too old, boring, long-winded, obnoxious, opinionated or what? I know its annoying with me posting about my health, but I've gotta vent SOMEWHERE and NO ONE on X knows me personally. Not that it matters so much now, I'm heading down the stretch-run to Home plate, but even paying for Elon's blue-checkmark, I don't get many hits/views or responses/engagement, it is pretty comparable to my "free" account that I use solely for NFL stuff where I have 1 whole "follower", which is probably one of those online ho-bags. It's not that I'm looking to "earn" from X and I'll NEVER post things just for click-bait value. I'm just really curious how these other accounts accrue so many followers for literally not doing much,

• 
  James Harrigan (@jamesharrigan) reported 16 minutes ago

  @MeganTStevenson not to mention AOL Mail! My 91 year-old uncle was on AOL mail until he died. My guess is that he was a representative customer.

• 
  Mystiqueknight13 (@playstationfox5) reported 20 minutes ago

  @Nyaralot3p @hasanthehun Like an elder god your incomprehensible...ly stupid. Personally I don't get your last toward hasan. He's ugly, sociopathic, an idiot, and a horrible liar. He can't even speak fast. Ppl streaming him have to do twice the speed hes so slow. Hes the AOL of streamers.

• 
  Chris Farrell (@chrispfarrell) reported 21 minutes ago

  I think OpenAI and Anthropic might be the CompuServe and AOL of the AI era. Does anyone actually think Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Apple, Meta, Oracle, IBM, X/Twitter, and all of the other big tech companies will just allow these 2 badly run startups to capture the AI market? OpenAI and Anthropic don't have a moat or sustainable competitive advantage. To win they have to not only develop a moat but penetrate some of the most fortified moats. Model quality isn't a moat. Kimi, Grok, Deepseek proved that. Inference will become a commodity utility that requires massive CapEx that neither can finance. Interface is where the moat is the weakest. OpenAI and Anthropic do not own the apps or the OS. The OS and apps are owned by parties who view OpenAI or Anthropic as threats, and they can complicate things very easily. As if that is not grim enough, AI sovereignty will become an issue. Consumers will want their iCloud data to stay in iCloud, their OneDrive data to stay in OneDrive, etc. Enterprise customers will want AI from their cloud providers to reduce egress and for performance + IP reasons. It is honestly hard to imagine a world where OpenAI and Anthropic survive as they are. They will either morph into companies with entirely different value offerings or die like Compuserve and AOL.

• 
  𝗘𝗟🐕⚒️👁️⃤ (@MasterNumber) reported 22 minutes ago

  Trust me when I say I’ve been into conspiracies since YouTube first came out. I’ve had a computer since I was six years old, back in the AOL dial-up days. Looking back, it all feels like it was by design. It explains why I was such a little ****. It explains the betrayals. It explains everything I went through. I was early to all of it. Like, really ******* early. Everything you’re seeing now is nothing new to me. It might be new to you after 2020, but I was already deep in this **** years before that. That’s how it has always been for me. And the dumb ***** who knew me in real life and still follow me would vouch for that. They know I’m not gassing this **** up. I’d actually love for them to speak on it because they saw how early I was to all of this. They won’t admit it, but I know they stalk my profile. And when I drop the numbers, this is not me being vain or thinking I’m better than anyone. I’m explaining why I’ve always felt like such an old ******* soul. I was raised around people who never understood me, and I only fully realised that around 2020. It sounds harsh, but it’s the truth Born on the 22nd 11 Life Path Dog year, the 11th sign Aquarius, the 11th sign All by design No accidents

• 
  CathyNotToday2 🌿 (@Cathy2NotToday) reported 23 minutes ago

  Uh oh … this is even BEFORE his massive Data Center hauls 💰 CHARACTER should matter to voters , not what letter is next to their name The Trades Byron Donalds Didn't Want You to See Byron Donalds spent years on television lecturing Congress about insider trading. Then the record caught up with him. Between 2022 and 2023, Donalds and his spouse made over 100 stock trades valued up to $1.6 million without filing the periodic transaction reports required by the STOCK Act. Campaign Legal CenterCampaign Legal Center The number, precisely, was at least 108 trades in dozens of companies, ranging in total value from $108,108 to $1,620,000. Campaign Legal Center HE DIDN'T DISCLOSE THEM IN REAL TIME. The trades only surfaced in annual filings submitted in August 2023 and August 2024 — more than a year after most of the transactions occurred. That delay isn't a technicality. The STOCK Act exists so voters can watch for conflicts of interest as they happen, not a year later. And the timing here raises real questions. Donalds sits on the House Financial Services Committee, and some of his trades were in companies that committee oversees, including Elevance Health and JPMorgan Chase. In September 2024, the nonpartisan Campaign Legal Center filed a formal ethics complaint asking the Office of Congressional Ethics to investigate. CLC argued that because Donalds understood the STOCK Act's requirements better than most lawmakers, there's reason to believe the omissions weren't accidental. AOL The irony is hard to miss. This is a man who once appeared on television demanding sanctions against members of Congress who violate the STOCK Act. Florida Bulldog He said the House "has to get real." Now he's the case study. As of mid-2026, Donalds has said publicly that he doesn't personally trade securities but uses a broker with trading authority, and that he supports banning direct trading by members while allowing third-party financial professionals to trade on their behalf. (PolitiFact That's a defense worth weighing on its merits. It doesn't erase the 108 undisclosed trades or the year-long gap in reporting. Voters can decide what that pattern says about judgment — but they deserve to know it happened before they decide who leads the state next. 🎇We have a real chance to shift our leadership expectations. Stop settling for party and vote AGENDA and CHARACTER Vote @davidjollyfl @GwenGraham Note: this uses information and reporting from the Campaign Legal Center, Florida Bulldog, and PolitiFact —

• 
  Crémieux (@cremieuxrecueil) reported 23 minutes ago

  @GraduatedBen You still don't have a point, and you ignored all of mine, which made your initial points impossible. But let's go through this comment, too. The 2000 by-right ruling is real and it's well-known, but it's basically irrelevant for your point. The buildout pace for DCs is well-documented! Through 2013, the county permitted an average of 6 DCs a year, then with streamlining in 2014, they got that up to ~14/yr. Circa 2000-10, Loudoun added ~37k Asians, when the industry was a few dozen buildings employing a couple thousand people, half of whom were contractors (and thus irrelevant). AOL alone had more engineers in Dulles than the whole DC industry did, and AOL's former Loudoun HQ was eventually converted into a DC. That is to say, office tech employment that *actually* imports engineers and such preceded and were replaced by DCs. If concurrency is your standard, then the 2020s make your theory look terrible because permitted square footage went from 26.4m in 2021 to 53m in 2025, while Loudoun's Asian population grew only 5.2% since 2020 (slowest rate in decades). The point (?) about Prince William County gets the geography wrong, too. The DC district covers 9,500 acres of industrially zoned land along Rt 28/Innovation near Manassas, which is not Gainesville or Bristow. The ZIPs hosting the overlay's operating DCs are 20109 (10.3% Asian), 20110 (5.4%), and 20112 (6.9%), which means basically being at or below the 10% county baseline. The Gainesville-area project is the separate PW Digital Gateway initiated by QTS in 2021, with a comp plan approved in 2022, then litigated, leaving essentially nothing there during the demographic window you've described. The 18% figure you cited is misleading because it's clearly not just Indians. You only get from 14.6% "Asian alone" to ~18% using "Alone or in any combination", while the county baseline 10% is based on "Asian alone", and Bristow 20136 is 10.8% (13.1% combo), which is nowhere near 18%. Adding 12,000 Asians since 2020 is also just wrong for PWC. It was 10.3% Asian (~49.7k) in 2020, and the latest ACS puts it at 48,594 (9.9%) Asians, with the Asian population estimated to have fallen ~2.5% since 2020. I think maybe you looked at ACS 5-year windows straddling 2020, conflating earlier growth? The actual Asian surge in PWC was 2010-20 (+19.85k), with 9 tracts >15% Asian at 2020, before Gateway existed, and before most overlay campuses operated. Also, Indian + Pakistani are only 33% of PWC's Asians (9,642 + 6,592). Filipino, Korean, and Vietnamese communities are the plurality of the area's Asians. In Fairfax, Indians *are* 23% of the Asian population, but Loudoun is 50% Indian, not 60%, and you only get to ~61% by adding Pakistanis. But this just reflects earlier waves of settlement anyway. Fairfax's Asians date to the 1980s-90s, and Loudoun and western PWC were built after 2,000, during the era of H-1Bs. This undermines your theory, because EVERY post-2000 tech metro exurb in America is Indian plurality regardless of the presence of DCs! Frisco, Forsyth County GA, Edison, etc. If Indians were a DC signature, you'd expect them in Boydton, Quincy, and Prineville, but they're nonexistent. You just kind of skipped over all of this and failed to explain why the DC boom hasn't also been an Indian boom, which is what your theory predicts.

• 
  𝓼𝓱𝓲𝓵𝓵𝓭𝓸𝓷 (@Rdynasty0019) reported 29 minutes ago

  @cctvaccident Dial up beeping .. aol connecting noise... totally unnecessary... wtf