AOL outages and service status in Cedar Falls, Iowa

Problems in the last 24 hours in Cedar Falls, Iowa

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Cedar Falls, Iowa and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Cedar Falls, Iowa

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Cedar Falls and nearby locations:

• 
  MAINSTREET BLAKE MAGAZINE. (@CaseIHRedZone) reported 14 minutes ago from Waterloo, Iowa

  i remember the 90s me and everts were little puber miscreants, and we were like let's get in a chatroom and say **** and we did (underlined) and my family had to send a letter of apology to twitter i mean AOL, and that's why i'm not really worried about what goes on on here

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Merica (@Niggerlogic) reported 2 minutes ago

  @MapQuest Who ******** even know your app exists anymore If you needed to show how ******* retarded your company is You just did it You were forgotten around the AOL timeline ******* obsolescent retards

• 
  Asymmetric Edge Research (@AsymEdge) reported 4 minutes ago

  @2147mill The problem with the normie test is that the internet passed it in 1999 too. Totally non techy families were on AOL back then as well, over 20 million of them by the end of 1999. Amazon went from 17 million customers to 25 million between 1999 and 2001 and nearly doubled revenue, and the stock still lost 94% over those two years. So usage only tells you the thing is real. For the bubble question I look at what people pay for the earnings. Cisco was over 100x forward at the 2000 top, Nvidia is under 20x right now. Same thing with the crypto half of your post by the way. Nobody uses gold day to day either and that never made gold a bubble.

• 
  Brian Suttmiller (@B_SuttyNY) reported 4 minutes ago

  @Irina_exh 19 for me. Never had an AOL address.

• 
  mr mula (@mrmula973) reported 6 minutes ago

  @Carpetpatch1 @OrevaZSN you act like AOL went extinct when 2000 came around. And honestly don’t give a **** about what it looked like back then. Everything yall had, we have now x10 and some more. Tf are you saying?

• 
  Todd AF (@BigTodd1776) reported 9 minutes ago

  @DavidShafer I thought @mapquest went out with AOL online, my bad...I do remember when cassette tape got feisty with Compact Disk for about 15 minutes, then they just went away. Bye Mapquest.

• 
  Nancy (@SJSU4me) reported 11 minutes ago

  @Irina_exh Never had an AOL Address. Yes to the rest....

• 
  Gregorio Naçu (@gregnacu) reported 11 minutes ago

  @MuseumCommodore 17 for me. Never used a TAC-2. I am too young to have seen a C64 running in a store. But I have left things like the 10-print maze running on a C64 I found in use at a daycare. I sadly missed QuantumLink. I called the 800 number once, and an AOL rep answered.

• 
  Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported 18 minutes ago

  AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.

• 
  Kevin K (@SloppyK556) reported 19 minutes ago

  @Irina_exh 18. Never sent a postcard and never had an AOL address.

• 
  Michael R. Rambo Jr. (@DarthVegeta) reported 20 minutes ago

  @Irina_exh 18 out of 20. Never had a waterbed; never had an AOL address