AOL outages and service status in Waterloo, Iowa

Problems in the last 24 hours in Waterloo, Iowa

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Waterloo, Iowa and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Waterloo, Iowa

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Waterloo and nearby locations:

• 
  MAINSTREET BLAKE MAGAZINE. (@CaseIHRedZone) reported 11 minutes ago from Waterloo, Iowa

  i remember the 90s me and everts were little puber miscreants, and we were like let's get in a chatroom and say **** and we did (underlined) and my family had to send a letter of apology to twitter i mean AOL, and that's why i'm not really worried about what goes on on here

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Ned Smith (@NedSmith940069) reported 1 minute ago

  @ToddVercoe @DrFeed5 nah dude, 1994 AOL. anyone who say "we" had it prior to then is full of ****. Maybe 1-2 kids talked to each other online, but the internet shifted with AOL in '94 - '95. Seems like a ton of large companies let employees take home their old work PCs. Suspect msft/apple funded it

• 
  Margaret Hudock (@nursehudock) reported 9 minutes ago

  @Irina_exh 19. Never had an AOL Address.

• 
  Ronald Jansson (@ronjassme) reported 15 minutes ago

  How much longer are we going to allow AOL to hold the "Power of the Purse?" Not to mention maintaining a say on American/ Foreign Relations, Ammendments to Federal Laws and the making of both Public and Administrative policys? It's just plain stupid. Bucket loads of Dumb **** .... That's what's it is. And she's dumping it all over US.....AH?

• 
  🕸 (@Danstonie) reported 15 minutes ago

  @ShivenChabria Its why i know anyone who makes fun of post grunge acts like puddle of mudd or godsmack never saw their early unplugged stuff. People will say the about a girl cover, but the puddle of mudd aol unplugged session they did in 2003 was insanely good, and godsmack sounds better live

• 
  real missing talon hours (@iheartlog) reported 17 minutes ago

  once the aol screenshots of them being an emetophile hit the fandom all bets were off. now it's talking about puking every night, the other band members spitting **** up constantly, etc...you love to see it.

• 
  ライオン Lion (@LionBlogosphere) reported 17 minutes ago

  The top 10 companies that crashed in 2000: Cisco, Microsoft, Intel, Lucent, JDS Uniphase, WorldCom, AOL Time Warner. While the internet and computers did become really big, the market was wrong about every one of these companies except Microsoft, and there was plenty of opportunity to buy it after the crash at a much lower price. (Intel and Cisco are still around as major companies too, but they were extremely overpriced then compared to what they are worth now. Terrible investments even if you had a very long time horizon.) Amazon was considered a minor company (and it crashed big time), Apple was considered a minor has-been company (and it crashed big time), Google wasn't a public company yet, and Facebook didn't even exist. So the point of this is to not believe the market hype about which companies are going to benefit in the long run from AI.

• 
  bill peterson (@billp97309) reported 17 minutes ago

  @Irina_exh I got 19, never had AOL.

• 
  Brian Suttmiller (@B_SuttyNY) reported 19 minutes ago

  @Irina_exh 19 for me. Never had an AOL address.

• 
  The Dread Bunny (@jpvanhoy) reported 21 minutes ago

  @lili_poobear @Phantom_King_99 @gizalovespizza Ok, look, you can probably find a half dozen slightly different definitions of the word "evolve" online (we both know you didn't use a dead-tree dictionary). But the fact remains, to not evolve is to stagnate. Even the definition you gave, if converted the boolean opposite, would say, "to NOT develop gradually, especially from a simple to a more complex form", and you could then argue that OP wants it to get more complex, but RAPIDLY rather than SLOWLY. The point is technology should always advance. Just because you're unhappy with some specific implementation of technology in the present, doesn't mean that "advance" will mean "things get worse". It's pretty childish to take that position, in fact. I mean, for ****'s sake, you're ON THE INTERNET right now, probably using either wireless broadband, or wired broadband access to post this message. Can you imagine sitting in at your computer desk, with the monitor riser and built-in CD-ROM storage slots, dialing into AOL in about 1996 and saying, "GAH! I don't want technology to evolve any more. I'm tired of sitting here waiting for JPGs of John Stamos to take 40 seconds to load. I'm tired of getting my directions from Mapquest!"

• 
  CEOInterviews.AI (@CEOinterview) reported 23 minutes ago

  An early Polygon investor ran the comparison against his own position. Yat Siu @ysiu puts the value split at 90 to 95 percent to the application that owns the customer, with gas fees going to the chain underneath. Polymarket's private valuation is 8 billion dollars. Polygon, the chain Polymarket is built on, is a lot smaller. His analogy is the mid 90s, when AOL bought Time Warner and the ISPs were the giants of the moment. AT&T is worth a lot of money today. It is smaller than Google, Apple and Nvidia. Critical infrastructure keeps getting built. It stops being the biggest company in the room.