AOL outages and service status in Mahomet, Illinois

Problems in the last 24 hours in Mahomet, Illinois

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Mahomet, Illinois and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Mahomet, Illinois

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Mahomet and nearby locations:

• 
  Marcia Frost (@SpiritsTraveler) reported 8 minutes ago from Champaign, Illinois

  Is aol mail down? #aol

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Marcus Sinclair (@MarcusSinclair2) reported 4 minutes ago

  @craiglashmet @sytaylor Good point, walled gardens like AOL fail

• 
  Simon Khalaf (@Simonkhalaf) reported 5 minutes ago

  @markpinc @jonoringer Consider the source. Buying junk assets and milk them for cash. Not a bad business, but there is no reason to say that how others are doing it is wrong. I ran AOL, and I know.

• 
  JackiO (@Jackio49) reported 6 minutes ago

  @AntiLeftMemes 18- never used AOL, never liked waterbeds, although I did sleep on one. lol

• 
  Star Wars Timeline (Ben) 🇷🇺🇺🇸 (@SWT_Channel) reported 9 minutes ago

  @JamesKruczek Like I said, it ain't about a **** measuring contest. That's a 12 year old's domain of debate. I always extended the olive branchi between EU books and Disney's canon books which I read for a first hand exp. to properly praise or criticise them in my reviews. All of it stopped when we all figured out their retarded tactic of slurring the fandom for Disney's financial woes and blaming "toxic male" men with feminist slogans. It's a shame because some modern SW comics were great until they started making everyone gay and introducing "the message". Either way, Disney never gave their "Canon" the chance to shine or compare to the infinitely more compelling epic scope of 40+ year EU world, second only maybe to Warhammer 40K lore. I have a hard time believing you even now, that you couldn't find a single EU novel compelling. Really? Not even one? If you hate them that's fine. Personal opinions are no chip off my shoulder. I can only speak to what I observed at my comic shop and tens of thousands of Star Wars fans I interacted with over the years, from AOL chat rooms, to Prequel fan site message boards, to NYC libraries and my film school. Love it or hate it, most of us knew it as Star Wars canon. We never threw the term around because it wasn't necessary to call spade a spade.

• 
  Big Country (@FunDreXO) reported 11 minutes ago

  @miumiuf1y Umm... Just eat a whole pizza. What's up with aol the sweet ****?

• 
  Chidanand Tripathi (@thetripathi58) reported 13 minutes ago

  20. Connected Account Vulnerability The Situation: Back in 2010, you finally made the jump from Yahoo, Hotmail, or AOL to Gmail. To make the transition easier, you linked your old legacy account to automatically forward everything into your new Gmail inbox. You haven't logged into that Yahoo account in a decade. The Mechanics: Legacy email platforms like Yahoo and AOL have notoriously outdated, porous spam filters compared to Google's billion-dollar machine learning infrastructure. By using POP3 or IMAP to pull that mail into Gmail, you are essentially bypassing Google's frontline defenses and piping raw, unfiltered internet sewage straight into your pristine Gmail ecosystem. The Fix: It is time to sever the cord. Go to Gmail Settings > Accounts and Import. Look under "Check mail from other accounts." Delete the legacy connections. If you absolutely still need access to that ancient Hotmail account for banking resets, log into it directly, aggressively clean it, and set up incredibly strict server-side rules there before allowing it anywhere near your primary hub.

• 
  vasabjit banerjee (@vasabjit_b) reported 20 minutes ago

  @danbright_ @Hertz I have no idea how they are staying in business. I know rental cars is a low margin one, but this is insanely horrible customer service. AOL in the early- and mid-2000s had better customer service. lol

• 
  🔻agitprop + absurdity🔻 (@agtprpnabsrdty) reported 21 minutes ago

  Different decade, same math: half the S&P 500 is priced at levels that a dot-com CEO called proof of investor insanity while watching his company crater 90%. The rotation at the top: In early 2000, the ten most valuable S&P 500 companies read like a monument to permanent dominance: Microsoft, General Electric, Cisco, Walmart, ExxonMobil, Intel, Lucent, IBM, Citigroup, AOL. A generation later, only Microsoft remains. GE was carved into three separate companies. Lucent was absorbed by Nokia. AOL became the cautionary tale attached to the worst merger in corporate history. Cisco and Intel spent 25 years climbing back to their dot-com peaks. Citigroup, IBM, Walmart, and ExxonMobil still exist, but none crack the top ten. The new top ten is Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and the AI infrastructure complex. Investors in 2000 were also certain they were buying the future's permanent giants. The data says most of today's winners won't be in the top ten a generation from now either, and there is no mechanism by which you find out which ones survive in advance. The valuation problem: In 2002, after Sun Microsystems collapsed 90%, CEO Scott McNealy explained to investors exactly what a 10x sales multiple actually demands: 100% of revenues paid as dividends for ten consecutive years, with zero costs, zero R&D, zero taxes, and zero employees. He was describing the math of the price investors had paid for his stock as a form of collective psychosis. Today, 51% of the S&P 500 by market cap trades above 10x sales. Half the index. The AI narrative is functioning as the dot-com narrative functioned: a story compelling enough to make the math feel optional. The math has never been optional.

• 
  Jeff Opdyke (jeffo) (@DigitalRoamad) reported 24 minutes ago

  All the SpaceX/Elon fanboys are upset that I said SpaceX is a wildly overvalued IPO and that at some point the share price will crater... and that is when you buy. But I hear all kinds of jibber-jabber about what SpaceX does and is and whatever. It's all the same words, just in a different order that defined the last 30 years of tech investing... and I've been around for all of it as a financial writer. So, here's a list of every IPO that was the biggest/most relevant of its time and what came of it: Netscape (1995): The company that lit the dot-com fuse. briefly dominated the internet browser market before Microsoft crushed it by giving away a competing product for free. limped into AOL's arms at a fraction of its peak value. Yahoo (1996): A $13 IPO that became a $110 billion fever dream at the peak of the bubble, then collapsed 93% to $8, spent a decade mismanaging itself into irrelevance, turned down a $44/share Microsoft buyout offer when it was already dying, and was finally sold to Verizon for parts in 2017. Amazon (1997): Went public at $18, rode the bubble to $113, crashed 94% to $6, then methodically became the most dominant retail and cloud computing empire in history. theglobe dot com (1998): Exploded 600% on its first trading day on pure mania with no real business model, and was bankrupt and forgotten within three years. VA Linux (1999): Holds the all-time record for the largest single-day IPO pop — up 700% — on just $17.8 million in annual revenue, and spent the next 15 years slowly selling itself off for scraps at a 90%+ discount to its opening-day price. Google (2004): The rare IPO that was actually priced like a real business, debuted into post-bubble investor skepticism, and rewarded anyone who held it with a 7,500%+ return over 20 years. Facebook/Meta (2012): Priced at $104 billion with a broken mobile strategy, immediately cratered 54% in under four months to $17 as investors fled, then finally cracked the mobile monetization code and turned a humiliating IPO into a 1,300%+ return for anyone who didn't panic. Snap (2017): Sold non-voting shares in a money-losing company with decelerating growth at 25x revenue, popped on day one, collapsed 75% within two years, and now nearly a decade later an IPO investor has still lost more than half their money. Uber (2019): Private market fantasies priced this one at $120 billion, the public market immediately said "no" and sent it below its $45 IPO price on day one, the stock bled another 25% in four months, and it took years of grinding toward actual profitability before the stock finally vindicated long-suffering holders. Alibaba (2014): Legit one of the greatest businesses in the world at IPO, rode to $300, then the Chinese government decided Jack Ma needed to be humbled, and a decade after its record-breaking debut the stock still trades below its first-day opening price. I am NOT saying that SpaceX is a bad company. I am saying SpaceX IPO is stupidly valued by an excessively greedy Wall Street trying to extract as much wealth as possible in this latest tech hype period. SpaceX will go on to great things one day ... but at 90x sales, the shares are destined for a deep, deep enema-like cleansing at some point. Extremely rich valuations never last. The history above tells you the trajectory.

• 
  EnKcre (@EnKcre) reported 25 minutes ago

  @catco718 @ThrillaRilla369 @AOL You need help.