AOL outages and service status in Danvers, Massachusetts

Problems in the last 24 hours in Danvers, Massachusetts

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Danvers, Massachusetts and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Danvers, Massachusetts

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Danvers and nearby locations:

• 
  Digital Business Traffic (@DigitalBizTraff) reported 31 minutes ago from Salem, Massachusetts

  I’ll never forget walking home from school one day, which I usually got A’s & B’s but didn’t feel challenged or motivated to be into it enough, when someone on a street corner of the subway handed me a floppy disk of AOL 1.0.

• 
  Mark DellaPenna Jr. (@MarkADellaPenna) reported 41 minutes ago from Salem, Massachusetts

  without being aware. I’ll never forget walking home from school one day, which I usually got A’s & B’s but didn’t feel challenged or motivated to be into it enough, when someone on a street corner of the subway handed me a floppy disk of AOL 1.0.

• 
  Bruce Bial (@BBial) reported 55 minutes ago from Marblehead, Massachusetts

  The Bengals must still be on an AOL dial up line.. make the damn pick!

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  ky (🦄/acc) (@kypwny) reported 1 minute ago

  when i was working as a cashier, there was this older lady who would come in every so often. we were talking about how she tried to snag a reserved AOL username through support, but i never saw her again after I said I was acquainted with ppl from the original AOL community

• 
  MmmSushi (@MMmmmmSushi) reported 3 minutes ago

  @megaburger_usd1 @ciderpunk20 She got put through the ringer not only on X, but also on discord. This was the very first token created on AOL and it got rugged. In fact, EVERY single $aol token has been rugged. They're literally offering apys off rugged tokens from their platform. How sad is that ****?

• 
  JURYOKU PIERROT 4 EVA ‼️ (@wubbone) reported 5 minutes ago

  @rdrisms IKRRRRRR i couldnt believe it when i found out the owner didnt do no damn interview bro deadass commented under his own horse. its so funny its like when david bowie did the aol interview

• 
  Brit. 💛 (@simmerdownbrit) reported 7 minutes ago

  This is wild af but when our internet was down as a teen I had a collection of these bad bois to use. Idk how it worked and my mom eventually told me she had to call so many times to cancel AOL

• 
  J. Sullivan (@JimSull59353417) reported 7 minutes ago

  @AntiLeftMemes 19 only because I never used AOL.

• 
  Great Friend of the Show Joel Wood (@GiftedMoney) reported 10 minutes ago

  WCW had been losing millions of dollars for years before they closed shop. If AOL/Time Warner wanted WCW on their networks, they’d probably still be around today in some form. People comparing WCW to WWE never cease to make my head hurt. WCW folded because they were the number two and folded under the pressure of going after number 1. They would’ve had a better chance without the merger but they were still fighting the odds. It’s a lot easier for the number two to fold up shop than it ease for number 1 to fall to number 2. Especially when the gap is as wide as it is with WWE and AEW.

• 
  Wrestlefish (@TheWrestleFish) reported 12 minutes ago

  There is no way to actually prove how much wcw made or lost time warner/aol/Turner proactively dumped other company divisions debts into the company they were gaming the system. You do not Cancel your number 1 or two entertainment asset that you are selling and not violate fiduciary duty.

• 
  Adam Livingston (@AdamBLiv) reported 13 minutes ago

  Imagine you're in 1995 and someone shows you the internet. Early websites, dial-up, the whole nine yards. You wait four minutes for a JPEG to load. Halfway through loading, it disconnects. You think "this is stupid, this will never work, I'm going back to the Yellow Pages." That person lost the century. Bitcoin's short-term price is set by the most emotional participants in the most leveraged 24/7 market in human history. Futures traders, retail tourists, ETF arbitrageurs, guys who got tipped off on Reddit... these are the people setting the price on any given Tuesday. They are not the story. The story is that banks are building custody infrastructure. Governments are discussing strategic reserves in official policy documents. Accounting standards got reformed. Advisors can now put Bitcoin in client portfolios through their existing platforms without calling their compliance department and causing a medical event. The people who called the internet dead in 1996 were technically correct about AOL's stock price and completely wrong about everything that mattered. The marginal seller is loud and the structural integrators are quiet. History belongs to the quiet ones.

• 
  Jeremy Brayton (@w0rddriven) reported 15 minutes ago

  @sherrod_im Same. BBS' were dope. It sucks not realizing the last time I dialed in but AOL and IRC scratched similar itches

• 
  PublicLikeAFrog (@PublicBogFrog) reported 17 minutes ago

  @raheelys Dad was given it at a conference, I think the pitch was you could scan academic cites with it? Never even saw a :c anywhere. It was like AOL keywords that need hardware more than QR codes. Tamagotchi + Monster Rancher would have been a better move.