1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. AOL
  4. Manchester
AOL

AOL outages and service status in Manchester, New Hampshire

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map
  • AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Manchester, including 0 direct reports.

AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.

Problems in the last 24 hours in Manchester, New Hampshire

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Manchester, New Hampshire and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Manchester, New Hampshire

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Manchester and nearby locations:

  • MisterScott_
    Scott George (@MisterScott_) reported from Londonderry, New Hampshire

    @AOLSupportHelp I was wondering why it kept asking me to sign in randomly

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • Pancakes_556
    pancakes (@Pancakes_556) reported

    @mxMXRXSE Isn't that rhe aol video where he looks up **** like "mickey and Donald porn" (not exactly that but stupid **** like that) then its like "*********** and get away with it" or some bs. Just like random inane searches nonstop

  • agtprpnabsrdty
    🔻agitprop + absurdity🔻 (@agtprpnabsrdty) reported

    Different decade, same math: half the S&P 500 is priced at levels that a dot-com CEO called proof of investor insanity while watching his company crater 90%. The rotation at the top: In early 2000, the ten most valuable S&P 500 companies read like a monument to permanent dominance: Microsoft, General Electric, Cisco, Walmart, ExxonMobil, Intel, Lucent, IBM, Citigroup, AOL. A generation later, only Microsoft remains. GE was carved into three separate companies. Lucent was absorbed by Nokia. AOL became the cautionary tale attached to the worst merger in corporate history. Cisco and Intel spent 25 years climbing back to their dot-com peaks. Citigroup, IBM, Walmart, and ExxonMobil still exist, but none crack the top ten. The new top ten is Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and the AI infrastructure complex. Investors in 2000 were also certain they were buying the future's permanent giants. The data says most of today's winners won't be in the top ten a generation from now either, and there is no mechanism by which you find out which ones survive in advance. The valuation problem: In 2002, after Sun Microsystems collapsed 90%, CEO Scott McNealy explained to investors exactly what a 10x sales multiple actually demands: 100% of revenues paid as dividends for ten consecutive years, with zero costs, zero R&D, zero taxes, and zero employees. He was describing the math of the price investors had paid for his stock as a form of collective psychosis. Today, 51% of the S&P 500 by market cap trades above 10x sales. Half the index. The AI narrative is functioning as the dot-com narrative functioned: a story compelling enough to make the math feel optional. The math has never been optional.

  • patri83268
    Patrick Boyuk (@patri83268) reported

    @GoldLoverXo I personally think history simply repeats itself. Just like in the .com bubble most of the early investors sold as they drop the price down through many different levels of manipulation. The big boys loaded up cheap as retail panic sold. Before the utility like Google, Yahoo,AOL.

  • HawleyChesser
    Sally Hawley Chesser (@HawleyChesser) reported

    @AntiLeftMemes 19, only because I was never a subscriber of AOL. I very easily could have - as in I have been alive the entire time the addresses have been available. So simply for my age, and availability/using simular email, I would have a total of 20.

  • vicki_mal1
    Vicki Mallory (@vicki_mal1) reported

    @ThrillaRilla369 I was a mainframe systems programmer, I did not 'surf the web' back in the day, terribly insecure (worse now). I used IBMLink my entire career. We used arapnet, other early networks to research data at Berkley, UCLA, JPL. Mainframes are secure, always have been. When PC's, the web for everyone, AOL came out, we laughed and stayed with secure connections. We had email on the mainframe, profs (under VM) for word processing, long before the public knew what those things were. There is no security out in this non-ethernet world now! Https means nothing. Data mining is to be expected and reading terms and conditions should have intelligent people running from certain apps. I have never had a FB presence, nor will I. I constantly ask anyone around me, family, churches, friends, who pressure me for one app or another, "did you read their terms and conditions?" I know, Thrilla, you wanted cute answers. I'm supplying truth. X is my only social media and my husband had to talk me into it. Now, I'm a posting, replying, liking, following fool! But I won't download any other.

  • furiadidonna
    FuriaDiDonna (@furiadidonna) reported

    @CurtisHouck “I had to get on the AOL dial up to find out who this Bari Weiss is. Substack? What is that? My internet connection is too slow to load the images “

  • OznovaPam
    🕊🎶Päm Schoen♡ (@OznovaPam) reported

    @Hitchslap1 Oh, this is funny. Did I ever tell you about the time I got one of my first jobs early on AOL? I was a moderator for the men’s message boards. They never knew their moderator was a woman. They just saw my title “moderator.” It was interesting to watch the dynamics of the different boards I was in charge of.

  • pamgtheriot
    PamelaGT (@pamgtheriot) reported

    @AOL Worst she’s ever looked.

  • Demoncoww
    Awl 'D' Best (@Demoncoww) reported

    @goat_finals @Shr00msy Since you don't get what I'm saying, I'm saying that there are more blatant examples of what you're implying throughout Gundam. I've been building gunpla since before the internet. My first AOL screenname was a gundam reference. Get ******** out of here with your bullshit.

  • Gdisme2628
    Gary Dodson (@Gdisme2628) reported

    @thackerpd CNN IS THE WORST. FOX IS PROBABLY THE BEST WITH HANNITY OR MARK LEVINE. AS FAR AS MAINSTREAM OR NEWS MAX / AOL