AOL outages and service status in Merrimack, New Hampshire

Problems in the last 24 hours in Merrimack, New Hampshire

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Merrimack, New Hampshire and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Merrimack, New Hampshire

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Merrimack and nearby locations:

• 
  Scott George (@MisterScott_) reported 55 minutes ago from Londonderry, New Hampshire

  @AOLSupportHelp I was wondering why it kept asking me to sign in randomly

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Victor (@gvictor808) reported 5 minutes ago

  @brockpierson Yes. Prodigy (Prodigy Interactive Personal Service) was a commercial online service that people accessed with a dial-up modem over regular phone lines. It launched publicly in 1988 as a joint venture of IBM and Sears (originally developed as Trintex with CBS). You installed their client software on a PC or Mac, the program dialed a local access number, and you connected at typical early speeds of 1200 or 2400 bps. Later they added faster modem support and, in 1994, web access. It was one of the “big three” consumer online services of that era, alongside CompuServe and AOL. Users got news, weather, email, bulletin boards, shopping, stocks, games, and similar features through a graphical interface—not the open internet at first. Startup kits sometimes even bundled a modem. The classic Prodigy service ran until the late 1990s; after that it shifted toward being an ISP before fading out.

• 
  Ben Tyson (@HexitBen) reported 7 minutes ago

  @theswansjr AOL was the first app on the internet Ethereum is the internet of money Bitcoin is a broken meme that burns $15 billion investor dollars a year defending unaudited, spaghetti code consensus

• 
  Integralmdvdt (@integralmdvdt) reported 8 minutes ago

  @theamelia___ 19. Never did aol.

• 
  Davo (@RegisLeDavo) reported 8 minutes ago

  Need wee Phillie back down the AoL til the window shuts because I need to know what ******** is actually happening in the building

• 
  Art 🇺🇲⚓ (@BeerAce73) reported 13 minutes ago

  @MapQuest MapQuest? Is that like AOL? Stupid *****.

• 
  jah🪬 (@JahdaKisura) reported 14 minutes ago

  @elefaantz literally like i love mel and sol but admitted mel ate sol up but i still agree w aol on the bryce and trinity thing. and then amora ate mel up so bad and that’s okay!!!😭 your faves can be wrong but they don’t get that

• 
  JP (@SorceryPelvic) reported 14 minutes ago

  @byoanarchy I will admit I was a "bad" student but they locked me in the server(aol dial up) closet for a month until my mom found out and almost burned the place down.

• 
  Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported 14 minutes ago

  AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.

• 
  Bubblegum (@VeriPatriot45) reported 15 minutes ago

  @MapQuest Talk about a blast from the past. Didn’t know you guys still existed. You must be busy hanging out with AOL and floppy discs in the land of outdated crap.

• 
  StoneHillWealth (@StoneHillWealth) reported 19 minutes ago

  @kejca I was an advisor for Merrill Lynch during the dot com bubble. Henry Blodget said, to buy Yahoo, AOL, and AMZN, one was bound to be a winner. So, it depends on which package you bought. Chris is generally right, MOST of those ‘winning’ stocks of that day turned out to be garbage.