AOL outages and service status in Landing, New Jersey

Problems in the last 24 hours in Landing, New Jersey

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Landing, New Jersey and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Landing, New Jersey

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Landing and nearby locations:

• 
  Rainie Rosenberg (@Lorraine_Ruth) reported 37 minutes ago from Denville, New Jersey

  @aolmail How dare you try to charge people to fix a password issue when your system online is not letting them. Your phone line is absolutely garbage people

• 
  Rainie Rosenberg (@Lorraine_Ruth) reported 60 minutes ago from Denville, New Jersey

  @AOL How dare you try to charge me money to try and fix my password when your online system is not letting me. Your phone line is garbage

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  The Dread Bunny (@jpvanhoy) reported 2 minutes ago

  @lili_poobear @Phantom_King_99 @gizalovespizza Ok, look, you can probably find a half dozen slightly different definitions of the word "evolve" online (we both know you didn't use a dead-tree dictionary). But the fact remains, to not evolve is to stagnate. Even the definition you gave, if converted the boolean opposite, would say, "to NOT develop gradually, especially from a simple to a more complex form", and you could then argue that OP wants it to get more complex, but RAPIDLY rather than SLOWLY. The point is technology should always advance. Just because you're unhappy with some specific implementation of technology in the present, doesn't mean that "advance" will mean "things get worse". It's pretty childish to take that position, in fact. I mean, for ****'s sake, you're ON THE INTERNET right now, probably using either wireless broadband, or wired broadband access to post this message. Can you imagine sitting in at your computer desk, with the monitor riser and built-in CD-ROM storage slots, dialing into AOL in about 1996 and saying, "GAH! I don't want technology to evolve any more. I'm tired of sitting here waiting for JPGs of John Stamos to take 40 seconds to load. I'm tired of getting my directions from Mapquest!"

• 
  Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported 2 minutes ago

  AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.

• 
  Roy Mueller (@RoyMueller13) reported 4 minutes ago

  @Irina_exh 18. Never had an AOL address and never had a walkman

• 
  DOT_Singularity🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 (@DOT_singularity) reported 5 minutes ago

  @SteveMoraco Boo- friggidty-hooo, This is nothing new. I want the AI to be able to pull in context from **** I wrote on AOL in 1995. My online **** game was strong! If you're Laboring under some expectation of ever having true privacy in the digital world , it's a fools errand. Crack on.

• 
  Sam (@SammyLem90) reported 7 minutes ago

  @aburk203 @alphafox AOL chat boards, shared AIM, shared MSN Messenger too. Different times: Napster, Limewire, Proxys, Memes, NES, Surge Soda, Lucas Candy, Butterfinger BBs and Mr. T Cereal. Sound of Dial-up, and Saturday night cartoons. A bike outside because for some reason it was ok for a 10YO to leave the house and bike a mile to the the grocery store in a beat down neighborhood. Wow, took me back to a time I didn't have to worry about bills.

• 
  William Roddy (@WilliamRoddy14) reported 8 minutes ago

  Loudon County, VA has the highest median family income in the country. It is not the richest--Elon doesn't live there. Loudon was the headquarters of the internet 30 years ago. AOL had their HQ there. The data centers were built before residents knew about the problems.

• 
  Gee Glock (@Geeology101) reported 11 minutes ago

  My **** aol now 😪

• 
  🕸 (@Danstonie) reported 11 minutes ago

  @ShivenChabria Its why i know anyone who makes fun of post grunge acts like puddle of mudd or godsmack never saw their early unplugged stuff. People will say the about a girl cover, but the puddle of mudd aol unplugged session they did in 2003 was insanely good, and godsmack sounds better live

• 
  KnightReads (@KDale53289) reported 13 minutes ago

  @Irina_exh 19. Never had an AOL address

• 
  K (@K53651110) reported 19 minutes ago

  @Irina_exh 19…. I never did AOL