AOL Outage Report in Rutherford, New Jersey
Service-wide status: AOL
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
- AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Rutherford, including 0 direct reports.
AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.
Problems in the last 24 hours in Rutherford, New Jersey
AOL signals over the past 24 hours, with local activity from Rutherford, New Jersey and nearby areas. The dashed baseline applies to service-wide activity, not to local outage confirmation.
- Service-wide signals
- Service-wide baseline
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
AOL Issues Reports Near Rutherford, New Jersey
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Rutherford and nearby locations:
-
I’m the Big Man, I think (@vodkasnowflake) reported from Manhattan, New YorkI owe it to AOL and SNL for educating me when I was still single digits of age. But TWA’s crash shook the **** out of me because I was visiting Florida like once a year, so I was anxious every time I got back on a plane.
-
slim maw (@yakameiin) reported from Newark, New JerseyBest thing about the streaming era is we don't have to listen to no ******* "aol exclusive" tags on every damn song.
-
TheFeralOne (she/her) (@tracey_f) reported from Manhattan, New York@nashmallow People laugh that I still have my OG AOL address but I use it for most things if it's not a Google related, but I NEVER see spam in my inbox, and there are only occasional false catches. And lemme tell ya, that spam folder is full to bursting every day.
-
Levon Hughey (@LevonHughey) reported from Manhattan, New York@TinaDesireeBerg This was a mindfuck to say the least. The piece of **** who made the poll did the old capital “i”/lower case “L” trick in the username. I used to do **** like that in AOL chat rooms back in the 2000s to **** with people.
-
Michael Riley (@Michael203W8) reported from Manhattan, New York@piersmorgan @elonmusk Piers I’m a big fan but this is the second worst deal (AOL/TW No.1) In history. Twitter has never made money, that was before ad revs dropped and before you tack on interest costs of $13b. Debacle
-
-
Matty 🇺🇸 🇺🇦🇨🇦🇫🇷🇮🇱🏴 (@Podia2Dromedary) reported from Manhattan, New YorkThe truth is I never had a MySpace account but I did have Prodigy, AOL and NetZero.
-
IG:@illrecognizeill (@illrecognizeill) reported from Bronx, New YorkBronx girls on Instagram be thinking this **** is AOL in 1998 with screen names like BxJeterGrl1086.
-
spike111 (@spike11113) reported from Pequannock, New Jersey@aolmail AOL Mail been down for 30 minutes
-
Bobby L (@lechaflan) reported from Jersey City, New JerseyMy favorite AOL/AIM profile was simply Times New Roman size 12 white background simply saying "Loading..." and away msg was "just got into a really bad accident. be back later"
-
James McEvoy🇺🇲🇮🇪🌈♊👨🦰 (@JPMcEvoyNYC) reported from Manhattan, New York@electroboyusa Nope. Same AOL email since dial-up. I also have the same phone number since 1986 and never had a Facebook account. Never felt the need to follow the crowd "just because".
-
🐱✨ (@Kitttiiieee) reported from Yonkers, New York@loveliestlor This was my first and favorite phone! As a teen I never cared to get a cell phone until this came out because I was always on aol/aim and only liked texting and not actually talking on the phone...not much has changed tbh lol
-
chrisghent.near ᵍᵐ (@ChrisGhent) reported from Newark, New Jersey@whiskeybaarrell @delia_cai Damn is this really a negative? I send all my junk to @AOL… nearly 20 years of junk in there.
-
The Daddy (@TheDaddyJim) reported from Staten Island Junction, New Jersey@FreddysUSA The code never comes. It’s been that way for days. Yes I’ve checked my spam folder too. Tried AOL mail and Yahoo mail both.
-
-
Stefan⭐️Universe (@AngryOroro) reported from Newark, New Jersey@crissles I'm sad that @KidFury never got to experience the blackplanet 12 at MDCC in '00 but he, like me, will get over that after quick after you have to explain to 3 grill fronts how to add the Bone Thug "Change The World" song to their page, while praying my AOL m4m chat dont popoff.
-
Tanooki Joe™️ (@TanookiKuribo) reported from Manhattan, New York@NerdOutWithMe @53rdCard I still sign in to check my mail. I could just go to AOL dot com but I like signing in like I’m visiting a place from my childhood. No one is there anymore, I’m the only one.
-
Jason Schulweis ☕️ (@jschulweis) reported from Manhattan, New YorkMy thoughts on the Yahoo/AOL news summed up as follows: - as a former Yahoo, I still bleed Purple for the brand. It mattered so much to so many for so long, and still does to a degree (just in different ways) - The middle is a bad place to be. If you can’t compete in scale…
-
GND Mass transit for the people (@iragersh) reported from Manhattan, New York@AOL need to recover scammed email account. Cannot remember prev email. @TechFuse @HelenRosenthal baip support. Aol is escalating case. Seems common problem.
-
Bobby Cubano (@YesITalkTooFast) reported from Staten Island Junction, New JerseyMad as hell bc I had to delete then re-login to my aol account on my phone (shut up, I know) and the notes in my notepad app I wrote from the end of June-present were not backed up So many single lines of lyrics that were never going to become anything, gone
AOL Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Louis, Tencent Fan (@LouisaCommie) reported@IANdrewDiceClay I feel like the more interesting hypothetical would be if aol timer warner just never happened and wcw just went further into the 2000s same status quo, qoukd they eventually get a booker better then Eric and russo? I assume ny the time turner retires streaming era has started
-
Paul Walsh (@Paul__Walsh) reportedPeople keep asking why Apple allowed OpenAI to build a ChatGPT integration for Messages. Do get to the point, I don’t think Apple anticipated a company using the permissions required by ChatGPT specifically to read, analyse and store people’s Messages when the Messages app includes iMessage and not just SMS. The entire point of iMessage is that it’s rich media *and* end to end encrypted. The permissions OpenAI needs exist for legitimate software, and Apple warns people before granting them. Backup software needs Full Disk Access to back up protected files. Security software needs it to inspect files for malicious activity. Disk utilities need it to search, recover and manage protected files. It’s similar to WebView. It gave developers a way to display parts of an app that could change without requiring a new app release and App Store review, such as terms of service, privacy policies and other remotely hosted content. In 2014, I predicted developers would eventually use WebView across every major app, with some apps built almost entirely inside it. I also warned this would create a security problem because WebView had no protection against dangerous links or malicious code typically found on webpages. Developers could make a WebView look identical to the native app, so people wouldn’t know whether they were using the app itself or interacting with a website. Today, in-app security is a multibillion dollar industry because it’s obvious that opening links inside an app might not be as safe as it should be. Most predictions, especially in the context of digital risk, are not believed by a lot of people. But they become obvious eventually. Today, I’m saying OpenAI’s ChatGPT integration with Apple Messages is more dangerous for some people than almost anything else on the market. Of course someone can take screenshots and send them to the FBI, repeat something they were told, or deliberately share a private conversation. That completely misses the point. None of those things is equivalent to giving an AI service automated access to read, analyse and store entire message histories involving everyone someone communicates with. Comparing deliberate human disclosure with automated access at scale ignores the capability that makes this fundamentally different. And why it removes the main benefit of end to end encryption. I can’t comprehend how security professionals can defend anything that undermines the purpose of end to end encryption by saying "but encryption isn’t broken". Protecting messages while they’re being transmitted means very little if an agent can systematically read, analyse and store them before they’re sent or after they’re received. Apple permissions have legitimate purposes. This particular use of them is the problem. During the early 2000s, I advocated for browser extensions. During the mid to late 2000s, before the first iPhone when mobile web didn't exist, I advocated for mobile web instead of WAP. In 2015, I advocated for chatbot integrations across messaging platforms and business tools. I’m a developer advocate, an open standards advocate, child safety advocate, and privacy advocate. I co-founded 2 W3C initiatives, including the Mobile Web Initiative, where I was tasked with rewriting Tim Berners-Lee’s vision of "One Web". And was a significant contributor to 8 technical specifications, including the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0. I care about humanity. I don’t advocate for one thing in isolation from everything else. I’m a technical expert in specific areas with OSINT skills and 30 years across web, telecom, and mobile. 💡 I consider every stakeholder affected by open standards, technology, and legislation. Sometimes convenience justifies a privacy tradeoff. Sometimes privacy should take priority over security, and sometimes security should take priority over privacy. None of these should be treated as an absolute regardless of the consequences. In 2017, the PKI Consortium asked me to advise them privately and write about the impact DV SSL certificates and HTTPS Everywhere were having on anti phishing security. I faced fierce criticism from privacy advocates who argued that the connection should be encrypted even if the person on the other end was an impersonator. Those were their words. If you care, search for "Insecure Elephant in the Room". The fundamental reasons phishing works were the same when I was impersonated in 1996 when phishing was first discovered on the AOL network, the same when I wrote about it in 2017, and the same today. Now I have to argue with some security professionals defending something that undermines the purpose of end to end encryption. They need to look beyond the mechanics of software and encryption. Technology is an enabler. We need to consider human behaviour, how people will actually use a capability, and what happens when that behaviour occurs at scale. Also, the potential intent that goes beyond a website or privacy statement. I’ve faced this repeatedly over the years. Today, when I argue that government policies and age verification introduced in the name of online child safety and preventing child exploitation are actually surveillance measures, child safety advocates accuse me of not caring about children. This isn’t rocket science. Add AI to everything, even if you’re willing to accept the risks to yourself. But please don’t add AI in ways that undermine another person’s right to privacy or, depending on the context, their personal safety. Some people's lives depend on their ability to rely on end to end encryption. We're not talking about SMS. 💡Criticising the technology used to pursue an objective doesn’t mean opposing the objective.
-
Mynxe L. Silles (@MynxeLSilles) reportedSeveral things to address with AOL mail. First, have had some issues with blocking mail, not getting blocked AFTER having blocked it, repeatedly. Secondly, cut it out with the -targeted ADS with names you know are family relevant. (Prayers)
-
lnvalid.eth (@invalidkicks) reported@MapQuest Is this like AOL? wtf is a Mapquest
-
Miss EsqHire (@MissEsqHire) reportedMy candidate at a small, no-name firm is about to turn down an offer from an international law firm because they use Harvey and his current firm uses Claude. Apparently he cannot live without Claude. Can someone explain the difference to me like I’m my mom in the ’90s discovering AOL? Any arguments for Harvey that I can retort with?
-
𝗝𝗼𝗲 𝗥𝗼𝘀𝗮𝘁𝗼 (@joerosato) reported@Dan_Jeffries1 Gates never said this. In the 1990s, Microsoft focused on proprietary online networks (MSN) rather than the 'internet'. Think AOL. The 'internet' was a side product you got by connecting to their proprietary service. Downplaying to be the source of connection = marketing 😐
-
JimDon (@ludvanb1313) reported@theamelia___ It would be all 20 but i actually never used aol...not once.
-
Thales of Florida (@FloridaThales) reported@MorlockP Blue collar business is fascinating to me because it's relatively simple (not easy, the work is hard) to succeed in it. Yet so many become broke or never make it. Then you see why. AOL email addresses, people who don't show up on time, never returning sales lead calls. Etc.
-
Tai (@TaiSmitty2) reported@MapQuest Holy ****!!! Does Netscape still exist too? What about AOL?
-
Jenna (@JennaMeshelle) reported@PCSoonersFan Those damn AOL chat rooms lmaooooo 😭
Recent AOL reports in Rutherford, New Jersey
Latest available direct user reports from this city and nearby areas. These are individual observations, not confirmed incidents or a complete outage history.
- Newark: Internet
- New York City: E-mail
- New York City: E-mail
- New York City: E-mail
- New York City: E-mail
- New York City: Internet
AOL detected incident history
These records describe service-wide increases in reported problems. They do not confirm an outage at every address. Recorded end times describe our detection window, not a provider-confirmed repair.
-
Detected:
No end recorded. This alone does not establish the current status. -
Detected:
Detection ended: (16 minutes) -
Detected:
No end recorded. This alone does not establish the current status. -
Detected:
No end recorded. This alone does not establish the current status. -
Detected:
Detection ended: (14 minutes) -
Detected:
Detection ended: (4 minutes)