AOL outages and service status in Willingboro, New Jersey

Problems in the last 24 hours in Willingboro, New Jersey

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Willingboro, New Jersey and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Live Outage Map Near Willingboro, New Jersey

The most recent AOL outage reports came from the following cities: Bristol, and Mount Holly.

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Bristol	E-mail	2 months ago
Mount Holly	E-mail	2 months ago
Florence	E-mail	5 months ago
Burlington	Internet	7 months ago
Bensalem	E-mail	7 months ago

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Willingboro, New Jersey

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Willingboro and nearby locations:

• 
  Nicole M. Pensiero (@nicolewrytr) reported 30 minutes ago from Mount Laurel, New Jersey

  @AOL @aolmail @aolmail I have been bounced around to five different people and I can’t get a simple answer. I need to speak to somebody who can actually help me. How do I make that happen? #CustomerService #CustomerService #customerfeedback

• 
  Nicole M. Pensiero (@nicolewrytr) reported 36 minutes ago from Mount Laurel, New Jersey

  @AOLSupportHelp I’m getting a massive runaround on the phone. I’m trying to figure out how to cancel something I signed up for before the subscription renews. How can I reach someone who can actually help me? Very frustrated! #customerexperience #CustomerService

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  lusid (@lusidghost) reported 4 minutes ago

  @dirtyhippie77 Before I reply to your comment, let me take a walk down memory lane and recount the first comment I ever replied to on the internet. I believe it was in a chat room on AOL. I had just logged onto a free trial from a disc that had come in the mail. I first had to make up a username and password. My head spun. Who WAS I? I hadn't asked myself this question until this very moment. Who, WAS, I? AND, what was my password? My head spun once again, but with more centrifugal force and bewilderment. Anyway, yeah no doubt.

• 
  Corbent (@corbentfrost) reported 5 minutes ago

  @LionheartGodric Never used fax, an aol address, a check book or a waterbed.

• 
  DJ Richards (@stumblebum54) reported 5 minutes ago

  @unseen1_unseen This is what’s was like trying to cancel an AOL account back in the day. But this account says it’s based in Africa so probably not especially credible.

• 
  Stereogum (@stereogum) reported 7 minutes ago

  After 71 years, the longstanding mail-order media club Columbia House is shutting down on Sept. 15. Columbia House got its start in 1955 as the Columbia Record Club, a direct-mail marketing program by CBS/Columbia Records. New members were promised a free record for joining, and customers could bypass a trip to the record store by ordering albums to be shipped to them at home. It was such a wildly popular venture that by 1963, it represented 10% of the music retail market. As the club spawned imitators, Columbia set itself apart by licensing titles from other labels, giving members a larger catalog to choose from. In the early 1970s, the name of the club was changed to Columbia House. With its introductory offer of “8 CDs for a penny,” the service remained a powerhouse throughout the late 20th century, peaking at 16 million members in 1996, the same year the Columbia House website went live. In 1991, Sony and Time Warner formed a 50/50 joint venture combining Columbia House with Time Life's home video and music clubs. As the market share for mail-order music clubs declined due to the rise of online and big-box retailers, Sony and AOL Time Warner sold 85% of Columbia House to the Blackstone Group. There were widespread reports of a planned merger with CDNow or Blockbuster Video, but neither came to pass. In 2005, Columbia House was sold to its competitor BMG, and then to JMCK Corp. It rebranded as Direct Brands, shutting down music sales and continuing as a DVD and Blu-ray Disc club. Plans to launch a vinyl record club with Columbia House branding did not materialize.

• 
  Chris (@CinemaPrincipia) reported 9 minutes ago

  @DustyRondeau @PJB170 @WeWatchedAMovie I'm sorry but do you really think parents pimping out their kids is best addressed by going after people other than the parents. Also, that wasn't what these stings were. There are statistics on molestation. 1 in 5 children are propositioned on the internet. It happened to me regularly in the old AOL days. (AOL did nothing to crack down on it initially) However, that is not who molested me. The number of kids molested by a stranger online is so small it isn't even statistically significant. Because I'm a survivor, I've talked to other survivors a lot in different groups and literally have never met anybody who was molested by a stranger.

• 
  Brett Caughran (@FundamentEdge) reported 10 minutes ago

  My playful analogy is we are in the AOL era of AI. Early stage of a revolutionary technology, but the delivery mechanism is still clunky, requiring really dumb concepts like prompt engineering. In 1996, you couldn't even imagine business models like Uber, Netflix, the iPhone, YouTube or Tesla FSD, because the technology wasn't even close to capable or cost effective enough. From 1996-2006 global data volume grew by a factor of 10,000,000x (per Gemini), but that growth was hugely deflationary (wholesale IP transit cost down 99%), i.e. good for the application layer and selectively bad for the pipe owners (telecom). Overall, the mix of massive volume growth offset against gnarly price deflation has been a, net/net, positive thing for telecom investing. Does that hold for the frontier labs? "Intelligence pipe" feels like it can be a pretty damn awesome business, but, like telecoms, the evolution of "intelligence pipe as a business" will be extremely path dependent and will require real business models with attractive unit economics to fund. Obviously most of the 90's era telecoms went bust and the assets were only financially productive for the 2nd or 3rd owners, mostly due to balance sheet issues & the subsequent closing of the capital markets window. Though capital markets have evolved materially since the early 2000's telecom bust with a regulatory environment more supportive of monopolies/oligopolies and private capital markets more supportive of funding massive cash burn (to wit, I think it's a really bad idea for Anthropic to IPO in '26, but what do I know?). So imagine that prior but like 10-100x the size of the internet. Maybe more? As in 1996 when you couldn't even envision Netflix/Uber, the iPhone or Tesla FSD, we have zero idea what 2056 looks like, but the exponential will certainly drive even more upside uncertainty in technology. idk, hard to be structurally bearish on the "intelligence pipe" and subsequently, infrastructure that feeds the pipe (though it feels certain there will be super gnarly potholes, messy shakeouts, and bankruptcies along the way, as we saw in telecom evolution), and ultimately what matters is free cash flow production, which feeds from the intersection of exponential volumes against unit level deflation. What's exciting to me with the improvement in the models, both frontier like Fable/Sol and open source like Kimi/GLM/Deep-Seek, is you are getting *closer* so seeing a real application layer possible in a very intellectually difficult sandbox like public market investing. Nearly four years from GPT 3.5 demo, we still aren't there. We are still in the "AOL era" - too slow, not competent enough, too expensive. But are we exiting that era? It feels to me like we might be. If I had to guess, my guess is the frontier labs continue to be good businesses (and extremely volatile public stocks), mostly due to the reflexive nature of capital markets & talent acquisition. But what seems really obvious, to me, is that 2026-2036 is going to be the era of the application layer, where the Travis Kalanick-style entrepreneur takes this "intelligence pipe" and envisions new & groundbreaking businesses that change the world. That entrepreneurial accelerate will drive durable and accelerating demand for the intelligence pipe, it seems. It's a really exciting time to be alive.

• 
  chsake (@chsake_) reported 12 minutes ago

  16...💀 The other 4: Didn't had AOL, didn't use cheque book (still don't have one), saw a typewriter but didn't use, and I know someone who had a waterbed but again never used.

• 
  Orange Cat Pinochet (@zaphraud) reported 12 minutes ago

  @cheesecakefd I've done this thru forums and Yahoo and AOL back in the day, but never really connected all he way with anyone on the new advertisement-funded social media. Oh well.

• 
  Blink (@HRTLegal) reported 18 minutes ago

  Remembering the time in the early 2000's when I called AOL to cancel my account and the Indian kept trying to upsell me on ****. Even back then the signs were there

• 
  frakmaga2025 (@FrakMAGA2022) reported 21 minutes ago

  @Futurenvesting Well, you can be sure that any company they buy is struggling for cash or can't grow, so they buy them and having a big layoff. Some AI info Financial Impact of the Strategy Skyrocketing Revenue: Consolidated revenue surged from $387 million in 2023 to $1.31 billion in 2025, and hit $704 million for Q2 2026 alone. High Operating Margins: Their operating and adjusted profitability have expanded rapidly, with adjusted operating margins reaching 54% and operating profits more than doubling to $278 million in 2025. The Debt Trade-off: While the individual apps become profitable, the parent company funds its aggressive shopping spree (acquiring giants like Vimeo, AOL, Eventbrite, and Airtable) through heavy borrowing. This leaves them carrying billions in debt, meaning a significant chunk of their operating income goes toward servicing interest payments. The stock went public on July 1, 2026, pricing its initial public offering at $29.00 per share. It surged 40% on its first day and currently trades around $39.31. The Good: Revenue skyrocketed 126% year-over-year to $704.2 million, and adjusted earnings per share hit $0.46 (beating the $0.27 consensus). The Bad: The company’s full-year 2026 revenue guidance came in at $2.78 billion to $2.82 billion, missing Wall Street’s $2.90 billion projection. The Growth Reality: While headline growth looks massive, organic revenue growth was just 3%. Almost all of the revenue expansion is coming from bought growth—specifically the rapid fire-sale absorptions of companies like AOL, Eventbrite, and Vimeo.