1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. AOL
  4. Huntington Station
AOL

AOL outages and service status in Huntington Station, New York

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map
  • AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Huntington Station, including 0 direct reports.

AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.

Problems in the last 24 hours in Huntington Station, New York

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Huntington Station, New York and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Live Outage Map Near Huntington Station, New York

The most recent AOL outage reports came from the following cities: Huntington.

CityProblem TypeReport Time
Huntington E-mail 1 month ago
Melville E-mail 4 months ago

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • its_miss_niece
    Denise (@its_miss_niece) reported

    @osucoffeelovr2 @AOL @juno I never had Netscape!

  • Shoestring_Lab
    Shoestring Lab (@Shoestring_Lab) reported

    For those of you who don't know the history, MSN was originally a walled-garden dial-up online service like AOL. A couple of Microsoft engineers convinced Bill Gates to turn the entire company around and focus on the public Internet instead of the walled garden approach.

  • heisenburgirrs
    Heisenburgir (@heisenburgirrs) reported

    People prefer to pay flat rates than metered. In today's age, you can give an agent monthly budget (flat rate) and not have to worry about how many micropayments it makes for products/services. Excerpt from "Case Against Micropayments": "What was the biggest complaint of AOL users? Not the widely mocked and irritating blue bar that appeared when members downloaded information. Not the frequent unsolicited junk e-mail. Not dropped connections. Their overwhelming gripe: the ticking clock. Users didn’t want to pay by the hour anymore. ... Case had heard from one AOL member who insisted that she was being cheated by AOL’s hourly rate pricing. When he checked her average monthly usage, he found that she would be paying AOL more under the flat-rate price of $19.95. When Case informed the user of that fact, her reaction was immediate. ‘I don’t care,’ she told an incredulous Case. ’I am being cheated by you.’"

  • malinvested
    malinvestment.jpeg (@malinvested) reported

    @atelicinvest kind of seems like it’s as simple as: can’t price to marginal utility in a competitive market, you have to price to marginal cost. and every day, it looks more and more like tokens will be a competitive, many-player, non-oligopolistic market. it’s not like AOL ever tried to price their email service based on the cost of sending the same messages via USPS, nor could Yahoo / Google price search based on the equivalent cost of the human labor of looking through microfilm at your local library

  • SabretoothSG
    Sabretooth | Exchequer (@SabretoothSG) reported

    Crypto has hit a local maxima, like the internet did in 1998. How you monetize currently in crypto is to clip trading volume. The users doing volume are traders. so everything ships for traders, perps, options, CEXes, dexes, launchpads, etc... Build for traders and you get instant traction. build for anyone else and you get crickets, so the traction data says traders are the only market, and the capital follows the traction data. in 1998 every serious internet company was a portal. Yahoo, Excite, Lycos, AOL, Infoseek. the metric was traffic. Everything was built to keep the user on the page, because the user on the page was the business. Search was actively deprioritized. A good search engine sends the user away, which is negative stickiness, which made search a bad product. In 1999 Excite passed on buying Google for under a million dollars. In 2000 Yahoo hired Google to power its own search results, because search was a cost center you outsourced. We are in the portal era of crypto. The Google of crypto will not show immediate traction. Google didn't. It sent users away, made no money, and looked like a toy to every smart person grading it on 1998's metric. If you want immediate traction, the market has plenty for you. Go find the next pump fun. The next Aster. The next shiny thing traders rotate into for three weeks. The next big thing requires conviction about what crypto is for, not what does volume in the next 30 days.

  • RobynDODonnell
    Robyn O'Donnell (@RobynDODonnell) reported

    @FOXLA All I can say is Paramount+ sucks. I tried it twice. It is a technical glitch disaster on my TV. It just loads like it was AOL dial-up! Give me a break!

  • QuantumQlink
    Qrazy (@QuantumQlink) reported

    @AwakenedOutlaw Most in Northern Virginia didn't even know these Data Centers are here. There are over 300 for Amazon Web services alone and many more new ones being built. They are huge, about 800k sf, all due to high demand. I know as I started working in one of the first, AOL, in the late 90's, all the way up to AWS recently for the past 22 years. There has never been any real issue with water or electric use. The real problems arising look to be Zoning and location issues that have real impact on residences and that is what really needs addressed. WE NEED DATA CENTERS! How do people think the Internet and this platform itself exists? 😎

  • MahsMining
    Terry @MahsMining🍁 (@MahsMining) reported

    @danbulmer70 AOL....OMG I threw away those disks. Never give them to my customers because it would just cause sooooo much headache. So many ID 10 T issues.

  • SergioVengeance
    Sergio Vengeance 🇺🇲🎮🤘 (@SergioVengeance) reported

    @JoelKatz @RealZaikTorek @Awk20000 Not to mention the very first big section 230 case was about AOL and them being too slow to censor a malicious troll who was spreading confirmed lies that led to harassment. So even if the argument is "the website didn't censor this" then that's a core Section 230 argument.

  • StuyBoyNY
    StuyBoy From NYC (@StuyBoyNY) reported

    @visegrad24 Probably comes with AOL dialup service, and no toilet, only a bucket.