AOL outages and service status in Minoa, New York

Problems in the last 24 hours in Minoa, New York

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Minoa, New York and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Minoa, New York

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Minoa and nearby locations:

• 
  Spooky Ceddy 👻🎃 (@CasanovaCed) reported 16 minutes ago from Syracuse, New York

  “Ced running that 400 hours free aol internet” 😂😂😂😂😂 I have never been attacked so violently in my life

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  MichaelJensen1 (@_Kadmos1) reported 5 minutes ago

  If Netflix won, I would still oppose it. I tend to not be a fan of these media mergers. AOL TimeWarner should have not been allowed. Microsoft getting Activision Blizzard was a bad idea. SkyDance getting Paramount? Horrible. Disney getting 20CF? Stupid. Now, the 2006 Disney-Pixar merger I do side with. Disney getting Marvel and Lucasfilm? Wish the smaller 20CF got both of those companies.

• 
  Jake🍁🇨🇦🏳️‍🌈 🇵🇸🇺🇦 (@RabidCoo) reported 7 minutes ago

  @lilhousgreendor I never had an AOL email address. Which doesn't help making me not feel old

• 
  Average Joe (@average_joe_x2) reported 9 minutes ago

  @celestineia Met a bunch of people in one of my AOL chat group years ago, never again

• 
  Rene (@rowdyjeepgirl) reported 12 minutes ago

  @Soaringeagle45 I never had an AOL email address. It was Juno

• 
  Sandy Kory (@sandykory) reported 12 minutes ago

  I haven’t been buying the "SaaSpocalypse," but Q1’s nosediving SaaS valuations gave me pause. After a week in SF last month sampling the AI zeitgeist, I have a better feel for where the software sector is heading. It’s the SaaS-to-inference transition, and it’s good. My long-standing view has been that AI is a net positive for the software industry. It radically raises the ceiling for what software products can do. It should dramatically expand the market opportunity for software, just like the on-prem-to-cloud transition did back in the day. Yet many have been freaking out. After all, haven’t SaaS switching costs come down dramatically in SaaS, threatening one of the pillars of the business model? Yes, there’s no doubt that the “cement around the ankles” of legacy SaaS has weakened. At the same time, most legacy SaaS companies have barely scratched the surface of AI innovation while maintaining their historically high retention. This is how it played out in the last major transition: on-prem-to-cloud. Many legacy players (pathetically) ignored cloud innovation for 5-10 years (or longer) and still kept their customers. It turns out that technology is stickier than most in the tech industry believe. Take a look at Bending Spoons, which IPO’d off the back of buying crappy legacy products and jacking up prices because users didn’t want to give up their AOL email or Evernote notes. Tech industry people are not like this. They tend to be part of the very small minority of early adopters. Most people aren’t like this. Neither are most organizations. Legacy software isn’t going to disappear. But if pre-AI software companies don’t embrace AI innovation, their customers will be much less forgiving than on-prem customers 10-20 years ago. AI capabilities are too potent and obviously beneficial. What does embracing AI innovation look like? It means layering intelligent actions into all software. Historically, great software has helped users follow the right workflow. Now, great software must do the workflow by triggering agents to take actions. In other words, inference. The great news for everyone is that this opens the door to consumption-based pricing models that can scale exponentially. For legacy players and startups alike, delivering amazing AI-powered, agentic features is the way to get on the vertical-growth train. Remarkably, the door is still open for legacy players. Intercom’s 3.6b exit to Salesforce is a great example. Of course, new pricing models mean new margin structures. Just as SaaS had lower gross margins than legacy on-prem, expect consumption-priced inference to have lower gross margins. This is OK! We’ve already seen massive wins for inference-selling startups with negative gross margins, like Cursor. Legacy SaaS companies need to find religion on this. Dropping margins is never easy. Lock up the finance team if you have to. The priority is delivering AI-powered value for customers. Everything else is just details.

• 
  Laserkid is now an uncle! (@laserkidprime) reported 14 minutes ago

  @Tsukento Oh man I never did use the AOL site as I was a filthy Earthlinker, but I was in the Loudhouse as early as 1995 (under the same username hilariously I've kept it the same going back to 1994 and WBS Chat, also long gone)

• 
  👑✨Leegggss👅🌈 (@SkatesNaked) reported 16 minutes ago

  @AOL Is The Worst Email Recipient I Have Ever Experienced,I Need To Speak With A Live Person!!!!

• 
  MichaelJensen1 (@_Kadmos1) reported 20 minutes ago

  @ERCboxoffice For the record, I don't side with various media mergers: If Netflix won in the above proposed merger, I would still oppose it. I tend to not be a fan of these media mergers. AOL TimeWarner should have not been allowed. Microsoft getting Activision Blizzard was a bad idea. SkyDance getting Paramount? Horrible. Disney getting 20CF? Stupid. Now, the 2006 Disney-Pixar merger I do side with. Disney getting Marvel and Lucasfilm? Wish the smaller 20CF got both of those companies.

• 
  grams de champ (@gramsdidit) reported 22 minutes ago

  @JeffJSays in 1997 i had our old clunker computer hidden in my closet with extension cord under the carpet around the bed to power so i could chat with friends on AOL dialup and play roller coaster tycoon after folks went to bed, never got caught. these kids got it easy

• 
  Critical Thinker (@CritclThnker) reported 22 minutes ago

  @brianstelter They say this is to compete against Netflix and more, yet in reality each study is a supplier to streaming services despite each having their own production capabilities. Sadly, Warner is the partner of bad mergers: AOL, AT&T, Discovery and now Skydance.