AOL outages and service status in Oakland Gardens, New York

Problems in the last 24 hours in Oakland Gardens, New York

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Oakland Gardens, New York and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Oakland Gardens, New York

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Oakland Gardens and nearby locations:

• 
  Carol McNiff (@cbiz) reported 7 minutes ago from North New Hyde Park, New York

  @AOLSupportHelp aol email not working for 12 hours . Please help

• 
  Mat Men Pro Wrestling Podcast 🎙 (@Matmenpodcast) reported 18 minutes ago from Bayside, New York

  @myreddreadsrock WWF at the time was super super hot when WCW died and it really came down the the AOL Time Warner Merger. TNA never had a leg to stand on.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  𓆏𓍝⇦⇦⇦ (@TylerW35386) reported 3 minutes ago

  @betty_egg I am pre-aol by years and years. aol is when the internet became entirely stupid.

• 
  Joshua T Berglan (@MayorExperience) reported 3 minutes ago

  Starlink, MTN, and Orange are all terrible today in Cameroon. I can’t even get a connection on MTN or Orange, and Starlink is running like 1990s dial-up. I used to log into AOL faster than a webpage loads on Starlink right now. Isn't there supposed to be a Blood Moon tonight? Not that any other blood moon I’ve been a part of changed anything, but TikTok has me convinced I’ll wake up on a new timeline tomorrow.

• 
  (PRESS)Scotty Fife (aka) NevNukeMonster (@fife_scotty680) reported 9 minutes ago

  @TommyO1947 And every body posted pictures on face book too So who is to blame, the consumer. They kept posting stuff on the lives, and leaving updates at default. Man followed right off the pier. AOL for a while all were using it. Then the discovery of FTP lmao No more chatting in public, we built are own room and games too. And not one American can go without that comm unit for a week All seem naked without, there is a problem. Powerless over that or the next follower post. GodRocks Crazy

• 
  Asymmetric Edge Research (@AsymEdge) reported 10 minutes ago

  @2147mill The problem with the normie test is that the internet passed it in 1999 too. Totally non techy families were on AOL back then as well, over 20 million of them by the end of 1999. Amazon went from 17 million customers to 25 million between 1999 and 2001 and nearly doubled revenue, and the stock still lost 94% over those two years. So usage only tells you the thing is real. For the bubble question I look at what people pay for the earnings. Cisco was over 100x forward at the 2000 top, Nvidia is under 20x right now. Same thing with the crypto half of your post by the way. Nobody uses gold day to day either and that never made gold a bubble.

• 
  Heartlivehealer7777 (@SpGhVa7777) reported 11 minutes ago

  @LikeUrDiane If we stick to AOL being only for emergency use or our own military use only, that would be fine. I miss landline phones.

• 
  Schinto Beans (@DollsEyeAvoider) reported 13 minutes ago

  @DaddyWarpig Based on how utterly ******* ignorant AOL news headlines read in 2003 before the Iraq invasion, this doesn't surprise me in the least. I expect it to be this bad or worse now.

• 
  💥Chris Barrett - Platinum Gay💥 (@ThePlatinumGay) reported 13 minutes ago

  @CliveSimpson63 Holy crap. You guys had AOL too? I knew you had access to the internet because I talked to many Brits back then. I guess it just never occurred to me y’all were using AOL as well! LOL

• 
  Mark Blaydes (@mblaydes1) reported 13 minutes ago

  @brockpierson I would login to AOL than go make dinner. By the time I came back the home page may have uploaded

• 
  Aüd! 🎡 #SWAG (@lyfeisgood111) reported 14 minutes ago

  I guess I’m just some guy that poke around because I don’t know Yeahhhh ion know **** but I knew exactly who to ask for and look for… Just like Ben laden How ah ***** knowing but he didn’t know nun… CIA thankfully I gee up on AOL ppl duck and hide and still get found!

• 
  Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported 15 minutes ago

  AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.