AOL outages and service status in Shirley, New York

Problems in the last 24 hours in Shirley, New York

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Shirley, New York and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Shirley, New York

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Shirley and nearby locations:

• 
  Arcueid🚩Bjornstad💘(LVL 32) (@theRealArcueid) reported 35 minutes ago from Coram, New York

  @rehab_kyle @vocaloidfagboy I'm a Wizard who used to be online since the 1990s and I predate /b/, so I associate Being Online still with Trying to Be polite -the Internet went from being Virgin (aol) to chad (b) to Virgin (modern social media) in your local argot, from my pov. But alas, I never

• 
  Chuck Gaffney (@princetrunks) reported 52 minutes ago from Rocky Point, New York

  @Grummz Companies need to get over the 20th century mentality that office work needs to always be on site. Problem is many large companies still have admins who use faxes, think the internet is still AOL & who think knowing anything about computers & the internet is, "for nerds"...

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  lnvalid.eth (@invalidkicks) reported 5 minutes ago

  @MapQuest Is this like AOL? wtf is a Mapquest

• 
  Pixisass (@pixisass) reported 7 minutes ago

  @DrDaymarcus I did not know that AOL had dial up service until 2025. Sources?

• 
  Rakesh Agrawal (@RakeshSFNYC) reported 9 minutes ago

  @ckneumann The dev team I worked with on one of my projects at Aol was from Mapquest. Absolute worst team I've ever worked with. But in this case, the fault was leadership.

• 
  ⚔️Tina Truth⚔️ (@_tinatruth) reported 12 minutes ago

  But AOL knew a threat was approaching. Broadband internet was gaining momentum. The problem? AOL’s business model was built for the old internet. The slow, dial-up world. To compete with broadband, AOL thought it needed something it didn’t yet have: World-class content. A merger with Time Warner would give AOL access to some of the most valuable media properties in the world. Together, they believed they could dominate the future of the internet.

• 
  Khazar Theory Enthusiast (@ashkenahzee) reported 16 minutes ago

  @KayakZztee5 @tombelaviv_ At least he has a gallbladder and a mother. One who didn't die ashamed. One who didn't have repressed anger towards her son for being a useful idiot of the feds just like Jason Kessler and mentally ill disabled former employee of Oddcast and AOL. Sven is his new mommy. Evil mommy

• 
  Blessed E v (@Blessed_EV1221) reported 17 minutes ago

  @AwakenedOutlaw AOl is right on right on! Or she's just down right lying because she knows lefties love fraud - so Cloward-Piven, blame your enemy for what you are doing. Projection!

• 
  Minnow (@Phila_Mino) reported 18 minutes ago

  No Nick, I'm done talking about dad. I'm exhausted, let him cancel his own AOL subscription and change the TV input by himself, I'm out.

• 
  Olivier Groot (@OlivierGroot) reported 20 minutes ago

  @theamelia___ 18 but only as there was no AOL in NL and a waterbed is something I never understood

• 
  Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported 28 minutes ago

  AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.

• 
  patrick 🏳️‍🌈 supports labor and palestinians (@pcarterwriter) reported 30 minutes ago

  @Dontcare1369 @jolandiiQ reaching out might be wise :) agent impersonation is a problem, and more than one agency has a warning about it. four agents i know of use aol addresses. one of them is male. <3