AOL outages and service status in Bridgeport, Connecticut

Problems in the last 24 hours in Bridgeport, Connecticut

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Bridgeport, Connecticut and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Bridgeport, Connecticut

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Bridgeport and nearby locations:

• 
  Robert Horny (@_LLCOOL_A) reported 47 minutes ago from Bridgeport, Connecticut

  @Beentrillaustin “Damn I was just talking to him on AOL messenger”

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  The LeBlanc (@LeBlancMJ) reported 6 minutes ago

  @otokyo__ 19 pts. Never had an AOL address.

• 
  -KEN- (@_KS2026_) reported 9 minutes ago

  @otokyo__ 19 Cause AOL sucked so bad!

• 
  dpetry (@dpetry1982) reported 9 minutes ago

  @0hour1 I loved AOl. It was my first internet service. Dial up was brutal but it's all I knew of back then.

• 
  Betty Egg (@betty_egg) reported 10 minutes ago

  @mysteriouskat I never read books after AOL. Everything I needed to know was on the internet. I literally had zero use for most books and it's not to say they aren't useful, but I just came up at a different time. I've been glued to the computer ever since.

• 
  Nikki 🇺🇸 (@goldenrose_79) reported 11 minutes ago

  @BillMelugin_ I am too old and was too poor in 1997. Never had AOL lol

• 
  The Lock (@The_Warlock_86) reported 17 minutes ago

  @mikeetoe1981 @LDMenzies If Austin had to retire right then and there, and Owen never died, Delphiforums and AOL Chatrooms would have been screaming about it for years until social media got popular

• 
  ✶ north (@chorusofsin) reported 20 minutes ago

  @Whitsdoll I have mold growing inside me. I have mold everywhere. I read Simpsons ******. I have a pee fetish. Both of my legs are broken. I love cutting into your trachea. I use AOL for my email. I know a guy named Jorge in real life.

• 
  HumanPotential (@humanracemind) reported 21 minutes ago

  Here’s what I saw. Possible AOL. Sorry to post such specific details, but it’s shocking. Silver and green, tiny specks spiraling through the air. Then an enormous blast, a mushroom cloud, seemingly dropped over Iran. Sparsely populated region, but still very significant numbers of human casualties in the hundreds of thousands. The weapon may not have detonated precisely as intended. More yield or radioactivity may have occurred. People in their homes, suddenly pressed against the walls by the blast and cooked to death in seconds. The small number of people closer, instantly vaporized. And afterwards a large, dark crater. An airburst. Small, green, and silver, typical gun-style weapon. Dropped from high altitude, seemingly flight from Israel. It seems a significant proportion of deaths occur in the period after the explosion. I’m sorry to just post such specific details, but this is shocking. And hopefully, it doesn’t occur. But there’s definite signal pressure. The psi information is a real signal, that when I look into it, resolves like this. I hope it’s just pure AOL, but I suggest other RVers target themselves on the pressure they feel, or the current upcoming event that seems significant. Sorry that it’s not a blind target. I’m sorry for this to occur. I don’t want it to happen. I don’t wanna see this and I’m not sure if I believe it really is possible, though sadly I feel it might be possible. Hopefully, it does not occur. Even if my interpretation was wrong, the signal I hit is on target. There is something significant coming up.

• 
  That_Data_Guy (@DavidSado3) reported 23 minutes ago

  Anonymization sounds safe until you factor in auxiliary data and pattern matching. The AOL search data release and the Estimating the success of re-identifications in incomplete datasets using generative models both highlight the same reality: re-identification isn’t hypothetical, it’s proven. Real privacy requires built-in protection at the computation layer, not post-processing fixes, exactly the direction Secret Network is pushing.

• 
  DVinny84🇺🇸 (@DVinny84) reported 25 minutes ago

  @WMcluskey @LeonardMJoyner @MegaBasedChad I got up, booted up the computer and AOL popped up no problem and the day went on as normal.