AOL outages and service status in Pasadena, California

Problems in the last 24 hours in Pasadena, California

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Pasadena, California and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Pasadena, California

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Pasadena and nearby locations:

• 
  Eric Garcia (@efunk64) reported 16 minutes ago from Alhambra, California

  @SteveTsak @AOLSupportHelp I had the same issue. Removing (deleting) the account from my iPhone and then adding it fixed the issue for me.

• 
  Patrick Graf (@patrick_graf) reported 44 minutes ago from Altadena, California

  Some of y’all never ran out of internet hours on AOL and it shows.

• 
  sidaXvida (@xBrownxClown) reported 51 minutes ago from Pasadena, California

  Remember when the AOL free trial CDs would come in the mail, sometimes in a tin box. I’d try to get online and I’d get all the way on to the point when it asks for credit card and then be like ****

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Kelly Hallissey Brat@THAT.*****.From.Observers.Net (@Bitchiest) reported 4 minutes ago

  @0x686967 I was never hacked on AOL. Well not me personally but thats another story

• 
  Henry Yang (@HengruiYang) reported 5 minutes ago

  @Ravenismeee When I was nine, there was no YouTube & no Google. There was AskJeeves, Netscape, Javanoid, Snood, Neopets, AOL, & some other old *** pre-YouTube, pre-Google **** that probably took forever to load if you were lucky enough to maintain a stable dial-up connection. I’m old af. lol

• 
  TANK 🥫 (@Anon_Whale_) reported 5 minutes ago

  @ciderpunk20 The thing is, you’ve been trained to think a certain way from that AOL scammer team. They’ve got you brainwashed. There are a lot of coins out there that are doing well. The problem with them is they’re just trying to push narratives that don’t really catch and they’ve lost all trust so no one wants to buy their stuff. It’s pretty obvious they use the same team to pump and dump their coins even their newest one rial looks sane set up as United. These people are true scumbags. I don’t go around, hating on projects, but if I find people that are doing **** that is wrong and shady and trying to cheat people, I will go out of my way to warn everybody. You seem like a good person and I would like to see you succeed in Crypto. But following all the projects these guys do is just gonna end up losing you money. I see you are at least in that Marborough project I was in that before it got shut down. That’s the only one that is putting an honest effort and seems to have a good team and they’re actually trying to build community. The rest of their coins are just complete scams pump and dump and they don’t even care they keep doing it over and over. These people are not good people.

• 
  Ion.eth (@ProofOf_ion) reported 6 minutes ago

  @materkel A lot of individuals always fall back on the incredibly dumb and unintelligent “lol remember AOL and Netscape?” analogies, and it always makes me want to pull out my hair. They should be making the comps to Internet protocol winners, or even OSI layers and their subsequent platforms and hardware buildout, but the insanely stupid human brain always wants to cite AOL, Netscape, Yahoo because it’s easy to grasp and it fits their specific desire (that hopefully Bitcoin and Ethereum are less permanent global infrastructure, and more like “companies”). Retard-world. lol.

• 
  Daniel Dell #BlockTheWBMerger (@DanielDell1997) reported 7 minutes ago

  For ****'s sakes, it may have sounded cruel, but there's a reason why Joe Barbera wanted John K dead!! Hell, even Ted Turner himself hated John Kricfalusi's take (don't ask me why). If you ask me, the AOL Time Warner merger wasn't the only reason for Hanna-Barbera's demise.

• 
  Alp Lee (@alpyeong) reported 8 minutes ago

  @cryptogle @americadotfun Yo i rugged by your platform 2 serial times. $united and $rial wtf. I remember AOL was under 2m and a big fan of you since then. I also joined the trivia sessions. What is going on rn??

• 
  Nintendo Prime (@NintyPrime) reported 8 minutes ago

  @Stephen_Agnew @TRIPSTER0 "Why is that weird." I've been on social media since social media was nothing but yahoo chat rooms and AOL Instant Messenger. People say and do all sorts of ****. BOTH IRL and Online. And what they they do, why they do it, that's on them. I have zero curiosity around it. Just because someone is talking publicly, doesn't mean I have to care. Like, I am friends with AndresRestart. But before we were friends, he was a fellow content creator. I valued his thoughts on content creation and his approach to making his videos - but before we were friends? Nothing else he said publicly mattered. Because I didn't know him enough to know why I should even care what he's talking about. "You should welcome that curiosity" I should welcome people questioning literally everything I say or do? All it makes me want to do is not say or do any of it. ", not shame it or be a **** towards people who ask you curious questions." So your questions are "curious", mine are "being a ****". Got it. "If someone asks you a question, just answer them." No. I don't have to answer anything I don't want to answer. What the hell kind of reasoning is this? Do you just answer everyone's question all the time? If you don't feel like answering - don't. You don't owe them anything. They are strangers on the internet. They couldn't be less relevant to your life. "Have a normal conversation on X" I argue normal conversations don't exist on X. Because if what I see is normal, I don't want to be on this planet anymore. "being defensive and being a jerk to them." Not only have your questions been answered, I asked questions in return. So I get it: You can ask me questions and if I don't want to answer it then but ask you a question in kind, and you don't want to answer it then - I'm the ****, you're the innocent bystander. If my post isn't asking a question, I am not asking for anyone's thoughts, nor taking questions. I do Q and A's for that. Commentary is just that, and people are free to disagree or not with my commentary. They are free to ask, or not questions. And I am free to answer those questions, or not. You seem to have this definition of "nromal" that is inherently "you must do what is asked of you because I said so". Nah, I don't. There is no normal. How I am behaving right now is perfectly, 1000%, considered normal among my friends. "Nothing you do here is your private business" lol "you do it publicly and so the public has a right to ask about your public actions" And I have a right to respond to a question, with a question. "Just give an honest answer and move on." I did. You didn't like my answer.

• 
  Uffda! (@Uffda_cs) reported 9 minutes ago

  @SinvexActual @OwenShroyer1776 @JoeTalkShow Yeah, go back and tell grok that's from AOL and a FACEBOOK account, ReTARD

• 
  Zego (@Zego67) reported 9 minutes ago

  @davepl1968 I was team lead on the PS-1 customer support team for IBM PC DOS when 5.0 came out. It was so advanced! We supported customers through Prodigy, and later AOL.

• 
  Uncle Joe's Booster ClownShow (@WonderlandChase) reported 11 minutes ago

  @rickjeff78 kind of like AOL in the late 90's before the worst merger in business history with Time Warner