AOL outages and service status in Pasadena, California
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
- AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Pasadena, including 0 direct reports.
AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.
Problems in the last 24 hours in Pasadena, California
The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Pasadena, California and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
AOL Issues Reports Near Pasadena, California
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Pasadena and nearby locations:
-
Patrick Graf (@patrick_graf) reported from Altadena, CaliforniaSome of y’all never ran out of internet hours on AOL and it shows.
-
sidaXvida (@xBrownxClown) reported from Pasadena, CaliforniaRemember when the AOL free trial CDs would come in the mail, sometimes in a tin box. I’d try to get online and I’d get all the way on to the point when it asks for credit card and then be like ****
-
Eric Garcia (@efunk64) reported from Alhambra, California@SteveTsak @AOLSupportHelp I had the same issue. Removing (deleting) the account from my iPhone and then adding it fixed the issue for me.
AOL Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
The Gal (@giveu2tictacs) reported@alphafox I actually do. I used to build computers back then. I loved DOS the way it was. I went to Windows 3.1. I was doing tech support for USPS shipping software back when we did the switch to 95. People don't understand BB boards and what the internet actually looked like before we had Internet Exploder ( not a type O), Netscape, AOL, etc
-
bill peterson (@billp97309) reported@Irina_exh I got 19, never had AOL.
-
1stRoundBust (@FirstRdBust) reported@Irina_exh 18 for sure, Aunt had a waterbed. I tried it, it was terrible, and I never used an AOL address. I was a yahoo guy. Still have it. I did, however, use those cds that gave you internet time.
-
Gregorio Naçu (@gregnacu) reported@MuseumCommodore 17 for me. Never used a TAC-2. I am too young to have seen a C64 running in a store. But I have left things like the 10-print maze running on a C64 I found in use at a daycare. I sadly missed QuantumLink. I called the 800 number once, and an AOL rep answered.
-
Fleetwoodzac76 (@Fleetwoodzac76) reported@nkhlday @MaxNordau @esaagar Saagar and the guy before him are not just talking about AI. They're saying the entire internet, going back to yahoo groups, Aol instant messenger and geocities is bad. Which is completely insane.
-
Gary Smith (@inflyte21) reported19. Never had an aol address. Can I substitute for an 8-Track to receive the 20?!??
-
Anil Gupta (@anilk04) reported@barandbench @_arnaC_ Complete waste of time of NGT and SC in such issues. Their shouldn't have been any case in the first place. Yamuna gets polluted, encroached by illegal dumping and construction, but NGT does not do anything. But they become very active on AOL 2 day event on damaging environment!!
-
DOT_Singularity🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 (@DOT_singularity) reported@SteveMoraco Boo- friggidty-hooo, This is nothing new. I want the AI to be able to pull in context from **** I wrote on AOL in 1995. My online **** game was strong! If you're Laboring under some expectation of ever having true privacy in the digital world , it's a fools errand. Crack on.
-
Timothy Miller (@MillerTimo90601) reported@Irina_exh Never had an AOL address
-
Matt Laroo (@Matty_Laroo) reportedSuch a weird time discussing AI with anyone who isn't super in the weeds right now. 99.9% of people who have been exposed to AI only know "chat", which in my experience is the worst current use case for AI (can be inaccurate, biased, too sycophantic, etc). Meanwhile, the 0.1% actually building **** (be it apps, businesses, websites, dashboards, slide decks, business plans, etc) or using it to help organize your life (translating "stream of consciousness" into readable notes, managing your inbox/calendar, creating a second-brain wiki from links, etc) is seeing where this is all going. Big difference is that the user (YOU!) have direct input on the outputs, whereas chat is just the delusion that you are getting correct answers from some digital deity (just a text version of brain rot, imo). It makes having conversations super weird, like explaining the potential of the internet to someone who only logged on to AOL to read/send email.