AOL outages and service status in San Dimas, California

Problems in the last 24 hours in San Dimas, California

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in San Dimas, California and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near San Dimas, California

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in San Dimas and nearby locations:

• 
  Laura Atwater (@lauraalovesyou) reported 9 minutes ago from Azusa, California

  Never trust anyone who still uses an AOL account

• 
  Michael James (@MJMichaelJames) reported 15 minutes ago from Vincent, California

  Will someone make a meme please about people who are still mad that U2 conspired with Apple to give them free music that they didn’t like? You know? They setup their new computer and there’s like AOL or something on it and they ¯\_(ツ)_/¯. Free U2 and they lose their ****?!

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  My Full Name is uh.. (@t14159) reported 7 minutes ago

  @brockpierson That modem is too new. It doesn't have any microphones. Go back to the source with an acoustic coupler modem. Of course, you're going to have a little trouble getting a working telephone handset and analog phone line. At least the AoL CDs will be easy to find.

• 
  Lambretta (@LambrettaGP1971) reported 8 minutes ago

  @james_spir19274 19. Never owned a water bed but have lain on one Can't remember ever having an AOL address. Would have had the Aussie equivalent tho

• 
  Mark Blaydes (@mblaydes1) reported 11 minutes ago

  @brockpierson I would login to AOL than go make dinner. By the time I came back the home page may have uploaded

• 
  Amazing.AI. (@amazing_AI_) reported 15 minutes ago

  @ThisOldTech2 As a computer user since '94, I'm trying to figure out why I never got a browser in a box. of course, I did access the Web through AOL at the beginning. 🤔

• 
  The Monarch Child Beyond 007 (Sovereignty) (@KingLouis0074) reported 16 minutes ago

  @AOL @INTERPOL_USA The Crown Issues this Statement Again to The Earths Crisis and Poverty. @cekinglimited

• 
  DOT_Singularity🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 (@DOT_singularity) reported 25 minutes ago

  @SteveMoraco Boo- friggidty-hooo, This is nothing new. I want the AI to be able to pull in context from **** I wrote on AOL in 1995. My online **** game was strong! If you're Laboring under some expectation of ever having true privacy in the digital world , it's a fools errand. Crack on.

• 
  Rakesh Agrawal (@RakeshSFNYC) reported 27 minutes ago

  Mapquest holding line on Lake Ontario. I agree, but no doubt it is just a marketing stunt to remind us they exist. I was at AOL when Google Maps launched. The head of Mapquest would send out emails every time they launched a feature saying people would never use Google.

• 
  Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported 28 minutes ago

  AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.

• 
  Schinto Beans (@DollsEyeAvoider) reported 28 minutes ago

  @DaddyWarpig Based on how utterly ******* ignorant AOL news headlines read in 2003 before the Iraq invasion, this doesn't surprise me in the least. I expect it to be this bad or worse now.

• 
  jrat (@pizzaxyz) reported 31 minutes ago

  @DylanMcD8 I had one and it was the hottest thing my junior year. My school had just gotten WiFi and they hadn’t blocked aol instant messenger. I’d still have it if some dude hadn’t broken in my house :(