1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. AOL
  4. Denver
AOL

AOL outages and service status in Denver, Colorado

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map
  • AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Denver, including 0 direct reports.
  • The most common problems reported in this area mention E-mail.
  • 100% E-mail (100%)

The latest reports from users having issues in Denver come from postal codes 80202 .

AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.

Problems in the last 24 hours in Denver, Colorado

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Denver, Colorado and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Live Outage Map Near Denver, Colorado

The most recent AOL outage reports came from the following cities: Denver.

CityProblem TypeReport Time
Denver E-mail 23 days ago
Denver E-mail 3 months ago
Denver E-mail 6 months ago
Denver E-mail 6 months ago
Denver E-mail 6 months ago
Denver E-mail 6 months ago

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Denver, Colorado

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Denver and nearby locations:

  • kittehv1876
    Kat V (@kittehv1876) reported from Denver, Colorado

    @ChrisJFuselier Never trust a Hotmail address, they are the new AOL. 🤣

  • GatorNationCO
    Josh WFI in Denver (@GatorNationCO) reported from Denver, Colorado

    @why_a_guy @cristela9 The land line bit had me cracking up. I remember the **** show that was AOL and land lines.

  • iansltx
    Ian Littman (@iansltx) reported from Denver, Colorado

    Verizon should have never bought Yahoo and AOL, but it's good to see them shed those and refocus. AT&T should have never bought Tim Warner, but it's good to see them soon both that and DTV off. T-Mobilr should have never bought Layer3 TV. Etc.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • JoshMcKinney18
    $XRPARMY (@JoshMcKinney18) reported

    This is exactly the kind of infrastructure-level integration that proves we’re past the build phase 👀 Ripple successfully tested as a blockchain enhancer for the SWIFT network (Hyperledger + ISO 20022) back in June 2025, and now it’s moving toward actual integration. Remember when the internet went from heavy build-out to mass adoption in 1998? I was an AOL shareholder and worked at UUNET selling the pipes. The parallels with XRP and the Internet of Value today are identical — regulatory clarity + real infrastructure hooks = adoption phase. We’re entering the Green Zone. 🍻

  • raferichy
    Rafe (@raferichy) reported

    First of all, I have to remember more than 5 Icloud email and passwords, more than five gmail and aol account, my in-game credentials, my social media password and security questions, my mom’s facebook password, and my home wifi password. I know when to wrap the **** up.

  • ThePoopeye
    Poopeye™ (@ThePoopeye) reported

    How do all these people have 10s of thousands of "followers"? People that don't necessarily post anything new or just re-posts of other peoples' thoughts & work. I don't get it. I've been a member for a while now (w/ THIS acct - my orig was cancelled by Twitter during COVID for telling the factual scientific truth about masks based on my years in Bio-Nanotechnology). Is it strictly from those "Follow" train lists? I learned early on to stay away from those - I check out EVERYBODY I ever follow first & personally (not necessarily relying upon Grok's "Profile Summary", although those may get me interested to take a gander). I try to engage those who engage with me and avoid silly flame-wars. I don't post to GET followers, I generally post current stream-of-consciousness thoughts, what's on my mind at that moment & not really organizing them into proper English "articles". Plus I'm not really good at pithy comments - I speak from my heart & soul and EXPLAIN myself & my reasoning for coming to different conclusions. And I typically don't engage in irrational, emotional hyperbole & name-calling. I truly want to know what others think and LEARN (you're never too old to learn!). For DECADES on BBSes (Bulletin Board Systems - pre-graphical internet days, modem-connected social systems for discussion, research & debates), the Usenets (newsgroups, pre-graphical/HTTP/HTML internet days when time on the internet was purchased through 3rd party vendors like CompuServe by the hour - 70s & 80s, pre-AOL (which is slightly pre-HTTP/HTML/Mozilla-Netscape graphical internet revolution) - where everything was command-line driven in ASCII, EBCDIC, ISO set or ATASCII or the like). Am I just too old, boring, long-winded, obnoxious, opinionated or what? I know its annoying with me posting about my health, but I've gotta vent SOMEWHERE and NO ONE on X knows me personally. Not that it matters so much now, I'm heading down the stretch-run to Home plate, but even paying for Elon's blue-checkmark, I don't get many hits/views or responses/engagement, it is pretty comparable to my "free" account that I use solely for NFL stuff where I have 1 whole "follower", which is probably one of those online ho-bags. It's not that I'm looking to "earn" from X and I'll NEVER post things just for click-bait value. I'm just really curious how these other accounts accrue so many followers for literally not doing much,

  • TheArmyVeteran2
    esco (@TheArmyVeteran2) reported

    @DosRivers Definitely never paying for Twitter but I pay for dumb **** like aolmail

  • _RaymondBernard
    Ray (@_RaymondBernard) reported

    My work computer moves so slow, reminiscent of Dial Up & AOL

  • hdqts
    Pastor Deborah Purnell (@hdqts) reported

    When is this country going to stop the monopoly of the internet giants who control the access & content of emails. Google shut down my access, refused payment, yahoo denied access, now AOL denied access. Google, Blackrock, Microsoft, ramped up their efforts to control us.

  • karimjrahim
    Karim R (@karimjrahim) reported

    @ohhanxiety Same. 19. Never had anything AOL.

  • Gabriel_Hale_
    Gabriel Hale • #Sandman⏳ (@Gabriel_Hale_) reported

    @AOL I'm a european user and have had my account for ten years. This is enraging. Put the password bar back to login pages. @YahooCare @AOLSupportHelp

  • Diamondairre
    blue diamond (@Diamondairre) reported

    @AOL stop being an ******* go back to you bartending

  • heisenburgirrs
    Heisenburgir (@heisenburgirrs) reported

    People prefer to pay flat rates than metered. In today's age, you can give an agent monthly budget (flat rate) and not have to worry about how many micropayments it makes for products/services. Excerpt from "Case Against Micropayments": "What was the biggest complaint of AOL users? Not the widely mocked and irritating blue bar that appeared when members downloaded information. Not the frequent unsolicited junk e-mail. Not dropped connections. Their overwhelming gripe: the ticking clock. Users didn’t want to pay by the hour anymore. ... Case had heard from one AOL member who insisted that she was being cheated by AOL’s hourly rate pricing. When he checked her average monthly usage, he found that she would be paying AOL more under the flat-rate price of $19.95. When Case informed the user of that fact, her reaction was immediate. ‘I don’t care,’ she told an incredulous Case. ’I am being cheated by you.’"