AOL outages and service status in Meridian, Idaho
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
- AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Meridian, including 0 direct reports.
AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.
Problems in the last 24 hours in Meridian, Idaho
The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Meridian, Idaho and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
AOL Issues Reports Near Meridian, Idaho
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Meridian and nearby locations:
-
Pam Phillippe (@limpinaround) reported from Nampa, Idaho@RWPUSA Too bad he wrote the introduction to the Mueller Report sold on AOL. I had to hold my nose thru that part.
-
Teal Tomahawk (@JagsApologist) reported from Meridian, Idaho@Jawabreaker OoT created Z-targerting that EVERY game followed since. It might have been an updated LttP but it innovated the game in so many ways that I can't agree with overrated Yes, LoZ and AoL is so decisive. It does come down to preference. But I give the nod to LoZ for creating it all
-
Did you feel that? (@Auroreanowl) reported from Boise, IdahoPSA: If you're reviewing grants on the Zoom Grants platform? It's useful to not bother sleeping and login while others slumber. Slower than AOL circa 1995, or whenever that was.
AOL Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
2xnmore (@2xnmore) reportedTwo people who were early in Bitcoin and early in Ethereum just went on record about $TAO. One of them wrote a book about Bitcoin in 2013. The other invested in the Ethereum ICO in 2015. Both of them started a fund with Jason Calacanis with a single thesis. Bittensor is the third great open-source substrate after Bitcoin and Ethereum. Here is the exact framing they used. In the early 90s Microsoft, AOL, and CompuServe were the well-capitalised incumbents. Everyone thought they would monopolise and run away with the internet. Then TCP/IP, Linux, and the World Wide Web came along and everything converged on an open-source substrate. Bittensor is that open-source substrate for the AI story playing out right now. OpenAI. Anthropic. Google DeepMind. XAI. Different cast of characters. Same pattern. And this time you can actually own a piece of the open-source substrate. Now read the valuation mismatch that should stop you cold. The four main AI labs combined are worth approximately $1.5 trillion. Bittensor is worth $1.7 billion. Ridges subnet competes directly with Claude and Cursor and has beaten them on benchmarks. Ridges market cap is $30 million. Cursor is worth $30 billion. That is not a small dislocation. That is a comical one. The highest valued subnet in the entire ecosystem is around $80 million. There has never been a billion dollar subnet yet. On Ethereum during the ICO mania projects with nowhere near this quality of output were raising hundreds of millions within minutes. Now think about how many orders of magnitude more capital is chasing AI opportunities today compared to 2017. When that capital discovers Bittensor the valuation rerating will be violent to the upside. Their exact words. Not mine. The man who called $TAO at $3,000 by end of 2026 said it directly. By 2030 it will be a trillion dollar ecosystem. Every molecule in my body is screaming this is another one. The people who read the docs always buy before the people who read the price. This is still early.
-
Bill Pratt (@draglist) reportedNever used AOL but everything else. Yup.
-
Markus O. 🇨🇦 🇨🇦 🇨🇦 (@mold26) reported@ToxicWorrier @llandoniffirg Dang it only 19;( Never had an AOL address
-
Laurie Hardman (@LaurieLyricalG) reported@EllieJayWrites You know I might be over there more if it was formatted exactly like it is here. I still use AOL email, I don't like change LOL.. I post my daily videos there, but not much else and I don't hang there
-
YukonSteph (@YukonSteph) reported@llandoniffirg 19 personally used but know about AOL but never had one.
-
Ian ᯅ (@somenuso) reported@POTFES This is not accurate. The DMA, DSA, AI Act, and similar frameworks are not examples of member states forcing Brussels to overregulate. They are EU level regulatory projects, proposed, negotiated, adopted, and enforced through the EU institutional system. Member states are part of that machine, but pretending the problem is only national fragmentation conveniently ignores what Brussels itself is doing. And yes, a deeper internal market would be useful. Easier company formation, better access to capital, lower compliance costs, cheaper energy, and less fragmentation would help. But that is not the same as giving the Commission more power to micromanage technology. If American tech dominates, Europe should compete by building better products on honest market terms, not by regulating superior foreign companies and hoping European champions appear afterward. Markets are not static. IBM, Intel, Microsoft, Nokia, BlackBerry, Yahoo, AOL, MySpace, and many others once looked dominant in their own domains. They were challenged, displaced, or diminished because better technologies, better products, and better business models emerged. That is how real competition works. Innovation comes from builders, capital, talent, risk, and consumer choice. It does not come from Brussels officials deciding how platforms should be designed.
-
CEO of Racism, homophobia, misogyny & model trains (@moboftwitsproof) reported@ArrioHicko33777 @PrinnyCherry @Kari445009 long ago I worked for AOL. in the smoker break area an argument broke out between signups and support. Support was saying signnups are a bigger part of the problem because they were adding users. signups was saying support was the problem because they were keeping ppl on dialup.
-
jill vejnoska (@ajcjillv) reported@unreMARKLEble Too bad AOL (what? They still exist?) got her age wrong by about a decade!
-
The Great Gazoo (@flight2q3211) reported@firstadopter The deal makes total sense to me. Arbitrageurs putting deal likelihood above 50% of going through. Can only make sense to compare to AOL X Time Warner if you think one of FOX or Roku has a bad destiny coming. FOX pays about 6% interest on debt.
-
Shuzagki (@Shuzagkii) reported@itskinkerbellxo Lmaoo they using this **** like we back at AOL/blackberry times I fear 💀