AOL outages and service status in Harwich, England

Problems in the last 24 hours in Harwich, England

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Harwich, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Harwich, England

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Harwich and nearby locations:

• 
  Daphne Sandham (@daffersdesigns) reported 36 minutes ago from Harwich, England

  Is anybody having problems with #aol today

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  The Lock (@The_Warlock_86) reported 7 minutes ago

  News flash, they never did. Even at the height of the Attitude Era wrestling was still looked down upon even with star athletes Kevin Greene, Dennis Rodman & Karl Malone headlining ppvs. Hardcore wrestling fans used to ***** in AOL chatrooms and Delphi Forums about celeb involvement. If you want further proof, no one outside of hardcore nerds watches AEW

• 
  soaper410 (@soaper410) reported 10 minutes ago

  @rodrigosworld81 I never watched AW but remember this being such a big deal on like aol pages and in the soap mags as a 12-13 year old. Rarely if ever is shock value worth it

• 
  Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported 13 minutes ago

  AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.

• 
  The Psycho Analyst (@TheRealBirnbaum) reported 13 minutes ago

  The horde is following each other off a cliff believing Madam Media’s hysterics over open source. I believe either Anthropic, OpenAI, or a newer competitor—or all three—will be ten times bigger than they are today within the next text years. The media is giving emotional reasons for the impending doom of frontier models. They’re spending more than they make isn’t evidence when every revolutionary tech giant did the same. That they’re doing it at unprecedented scale is a stronger version of the same point. Anthropic has penetrated about 1% of the enterprise market. Use cases are in their infancy. LLMs are the AOL of the AI age. We haven’t even gotten robotics and healthcare and everything else. The hyperscalers are only starting to show the analysts how slavishly emotional they are. The economists pointing to history books have never been right. They were the same group claiming we’d hit a new all time high plateau in 1999. History never repeats and rhymes only when you tilt your head and squint. In reality, reality is a complex adaptive system that requires constant analysis and logical assessment. There are no shortcuts, and you should never trust the hacks who use them. $AMZN $GOOGL

• 
  BoomKen (@Ken417063De) reported 14 minutes ago

  @PokeRestockApp @Pagan_GMR That was the first rule of the internet when AoL & CompuServe was sending the FREE cds to everyone & everything. NEVER give ANYONE your real name online there was even a PSA about it.

• 
  Jonas (@JASeagal) reported 16 minutes ago

  @NoleftT @Si64si 19 too, bit weirdly never had an AOL address.

• 
  Beaubien (@el_beaubien) reported 19 minutes ago

  @PhilosophyOnX Not to punish ... rather to ignore. That's a lifetime observation. Post an argument ... get an argument. Post an actual functional idea ... you get crickets. In general, people have no ideas of their own and so cannot process ideas generically. They have not the experience of it. I have found this to be true ... 100% of the time. Whenever anyone objects vigorously to an idea I have posted on the internet ... without a single exception in the time I've been on it (since ~1994 AOL) ... the person objecting will have no idea of their own to offer ... only invective and support for the status quo regardless of what it is.

• 
  ライオン Lion (@LionBlogosphere) reported 20 minutes ago

  The top 10 companies that crashed in 2000: Cisco, Microsoft, Intel, Lucent, JDS Uniphase, WorldCom, AOL Time Warner. While the internet and computers did become really big, the market was wrong about every one of these companies except Microsoft, and there was plenty of opportunity to buy it after the crash at a much lower price. (Intel and Cisco are still around as major companies too, but they were extremely overpriced then compared to what they are worth now. Terrible investments even if you had a very long time horizon.) Amazon was considered a minor company (and it crashed big time), Apple was considered a minor has-been company (and it crashed big time), Google wasn't a public company yet, and Facebook didn't even exist. So the point of this is to not believe the market hype about which companies are going to benefit in the long run from AI.

• 
  @KenAlex71 (@kenalex71) reported 23 minutes ago

  @Irina_exh 19. Never had an AOL account

• 
  oddhan (@oddhanfoo) reported 24 minutes ago

  @pennyelizabeths I've been online since before people had heard of AOL. I've seen the technology advance. Mass gov surveillance is always a threat has never relied on any one technology, how Flock works and is used is a threat to civil rights and data centers, which long preceded it, are not.