AOL outages and service status in Waterford, Connecticut

Problems in the last 24 hours in Waterford, Connecticut

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Waterford, Connecticut and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Waterford, Connecticut

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Waterford and nearby locations:

• 
  Jet Screamer (@BrundIefIy) reported 13 minutes ago from New London, Connecticut

  @ifandbut01 @ThatEnglishGent @LoreReloaded @SpacedockHQ @MccabeAlasdair @EckhartsLadder No, but the FidoNet BBS's did. We also had Prodigy, and AOL. Some smaller ones as well. There has always been debate. Never has it been so bad. I remember there being a lot of hate for Voyager. Hate for DS9. The hate because, or over (neutrality sake) STD, imo is overwhelming!

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Sabretooth | Exchequer (@SabretoothSG) reported 4 minutes ago

  Crypto has hit a local maxima, like the internet did in 1998. How you monetize currently in crypto is to clip trading volume. The users doing volume are traders. so everything ships for traders, perps, options, CEXes, dexes, launchpads, etc... Build for traders and you get instant traction. build for anyone else and you get crickets, so the traction data says traders are the only market, and the capital follows the traction data. in 1998 every serious internet company was a portal. Yahoo, Excite, Lycos, AOL, Infoseek. the metric was traffic. Everything was built to keep the user on the page, because the user on the page was the business. Search was actively deprioritized. A good search engine sends the user away, which is negative stickiness, which made search a bad product. In 1999 Excite passed on buying Google for under a million dollars. In 2000 Yahoo hired Google to power its own search results, because search was a cost center you outsourced. We are in the portal era of crypto. The Google of crypto will not show immediate traction. Google didn't. It sent users away, made no money, and looked like a toy to every smart person grading it on 1998's metric. If you want immediate traction, the market has plenty for you. Go find the next pump fun. The next Aster. The next shiny thing traders rotate into for three weeks. The next big thing requires conviction about what crypto is for, not what does volume in the next 30 days.

• 
  JJ Faulk (@JohnWilliamFau2) reported 6 minutes ago

  @mezmerelda007 @502KYGal @GretchenVoss64 Aussie I need your help , I think I know how to prove that Jen did the 2:27am Safari / Google search , ok so you have to understand how Safari works , its not a search engine so it sends your request to other search engines like Google , AOL or Bing , OK so wouldn't those search engines have a timestamp , for their own records of what was requested on what date , and the exact time requested ? But how do we get this info ? From Google history ? Or can Karen subpeona those search engines that Safari asked ?

• 
  Black Boomer (@MilennialBoom) reported 9 minutes ago

  @MFruitninja @Motheo37001950 I’ve been on the internet since I was 12/13. AOL Teen Chat, etc being an only child I wanted connect with my peers at home. It was very wholesome for me. Never engaged with anyone other than my age mates.

• 
  julez • missing txt 🩷🇵🇸 (@yawnzziangel) reported 10 minutes ago

  @AbakpaJob and i’ll never buy for storage bc it used to be free. i’ll make hundreds of gmails, outlooks, yahoo, idk aol emails before i buy storage for emails

• 
  Howling Kinoblade (@kinocopter) reported 12 minutes ago

  @SmashJT Reminds me of telling people on AOL 3.0 to delete System32 to fix their issue.

• 
  Mike Wisgarda (@NavigationDeck) reported 12 minutes ago

  @NavigationDeck I am at the point in life where I am not ashamed to admit: - I never dipped a toe in the Apple ecosphere -I never had an AOL account -My last video game was Atari Pong -I admire Tesla but remain disinterested -I learned person to person skills w/ a paper route

• 
  Jzell2285 (@jzell2285) reported 14 minutes ago

  @doc_1029 @KickRocks2026 I agree with you. I got to say, though...Years ago. AOL was the king. And I was involved w an online game. N I got to tell u the two techie guys would argue every week during n after our missions I loved watching them argue. Some kind of voyeurism issue I don't know. But I got a kick out of it

• 
  Robyn O'Donnell (@RobynDODonnell) reported 16 minutes ago

  LOL, compete with other streaming mergers. Paramount+ works worse than AOL dial-up in the 1990's. It sucks so bad they need help!

• 
  Param Reddy (@ParamRReddy) reported 18 minutes ago

  @TimSweeneyEpic @deanwball we can also substitute microsoft claiming open source is dangerous because instead of windows regulating the compute, oss linux is enabling compute for everyone and could result in bad actors getting access to unregulated compute. aol can say same about open internet.

• 
  Del Leonard Jones (@jonesdel) reported 19 minutes ago

  @chamath Frontier models are headed down the AOL road. The question is, when Anthropic and OpenAI fail, who gets dragged down with them? What companies do well? Nvidia? Hyperscalers?