NatWest status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours in East Preston, England

The chart below shows the number of NatWest reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in East Preston, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

NatWest Issues Reports Near East Preston, England

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in East Preston and nearby locations:

• 
  Victoria Workman (@NanaTorTor) reported 32 minutes ago from Worthing, England

  @NatWest_Help Please will someone from NatWest help with a major issue? Not getting anywhere and my anxious family members are becoming Ill with worry!!

• 
  Victor Santo Olliver (@VictorOlliver) reported 49 minutes ago from Sompting, England

  @essiefox I left for Homeserve after NatWest, went to Churchill, now better offer from British Gas home insurance. Homeserve years back were slow.

NatWest Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  dav1d.btc (@dav1dbtc) reported 6 minutes ago

  BoE warnings about stablecoin redemption are a joke. Try withdrawing any significant amount of cash from your bank and see how simple 'redemption' really is. Recently, UK bank NatWest blocked a customer from withdrawing their own money because they would not explain to the bank why the cash. And the Ombudsman backed the bank. This isn’t about consumer protection. It’s about protecting the banking monopoly. If Andrew Bailey is genuinely concerned about redemption risk, he should be looking at non-custodial systems like Ducat. Redemption happens in one Bitcoin block. I think I may be waiting some time.

• 
  Connie (@ConnieSherge) reported 12 minutes ago

  @12beattiestp @PedeJo__ @isabelrosesss this is correct. the bank is natwest (rbs) nobody has access to anything and everything is scrambled outside of production. i dont think theres even a fat unix wizard who has access to read production, from what i remember working there

• 
  SAGAR THAKKAR (@sagarthakkar189) reported 16 minutes ago

  India Daybook – Stocks in News *KEC International:* Company has received new orders worth Rs 1,180 crore. (Positive) *RBL Bank:* CARE Ratings upgraded the rating on Tier II bonds to CARE AAA/Stable from CARE AA-. (Positive) *PDS:* Company partners with Busana Apparel Group to build next-generation global apparel manufacturing and expand sourcing capabilities, scale and supply chain resilience. (Positive) *Jammu & Kashmir Bank:* Monetization of stake in PNB MetLife. (Positive) *SEAMEC:* Board approved sale of vessel “SEAMEC Gallant”. (Positive) *Ather Energy:* Additional investments of Rs 1000 cr by Hero Moto Corp. (Positive) *Textile Stocks, United Spirits:* India-UK FTA effective from today. (Positive) *Quess Corp, Teamlease:* India has prohibited the import of goods produced using forced labour. (Positive) *SG Mart:* Abu Dhabi Investment Authority bought 11.23lk shares (Positive) *Dalmia Sugar:* Company has approved development of an integrated sugar project in Tanzania through its subsidiary. (Positive) *Capacite Infraprojects:* Company has secured repeat order worth ₹482 Crore. (Positive) *LTTS:* Company has partnered with Anthropic to accelerate AI-led engineering, integrating Claude models across its proprietary platforms (Positive) *Landmark Cars:* Company has recorded highest-ever Q1 sales, with revenue rising 22.5% YoY to ₹1,733 crore, driven by strong vehicle sales growth and robust after-sales performance. (Positive) *IOL Chemicals & Pharmaceuticals:* Company's Clopidogrel Bisulfate API has received approval from China's National Medical Products Administration (NMPA), strengthening its presence in the Chinese pharmaceutical market. (Positive) *OM Infra:* Infomerics has upgraded the company's credit ratings for Rs. 718.96 crore of bank loan facilities. (Positive) *Vedanta:* Company plans to nearly triple its zinc and lead production capacity by FY31. (Positive) *Easy Trip Planners:* Company has signed MoU with the Government of Jharkhand to promote tourism digitally across the state. (Positive) *United Spirits:* Management stated that India is poised to become one of the world's largest premium alcoholic beverage markets over the next decade. (Positive) *Kirloskar Brothers:* Company's UK subsidiary has secured an order worth GBP 11.7 million from Saipem for the supply of vertical pumps and spares. (Positive) *Delhivery:* Company's wholly owned subsidiary has received RBI approval for registration as a Non-Banking Financial Company (NBFC), subject to compliance with regulatory conditions. (Positive) *Shriram Finance:* Company's Board will meet on July 24, 2026 to consider raising funds through the issuance of Non-Convertible Debentures (NCDs). (Neutral) *Axis Bank:* Company has completed the preferential issue in Axis Finance Ltd. Following the issue, its stake has reduced to 94.92%, while retaining its status as the holding company. (Neutral) *Vedanta:* Management stated that India could achieve 50% self-sufficiency in critical minerals within the next 5–10 years. (Neutral) *Manaksia Coated Metals & Industries:* Q1 FY27 Standalone Net Profit at Rs. 14.2 crore vs Rs. 14.1 crore YoY. Revenue at Rs. 262 crore vs Rs. 250 crore YoY. (Neutral) *ICICI Bank:* Board will consider a proposal to revise the overseas bond fundraising limit. (Neutral) *Jindal SAW:* Q1 FY27 Net Profit at Rs. 104 crore vs Rs. 424 crore YoY. Revenue at Rs. 4,452 crore vs Rs. 4,085 crore YoY. (Neutral) *HPCL:* India Ratings & Research has assigned an IND A1+ rating with a Stable outlook to the company's proposed Rs. 10,000 crore Commercial Paper programme. (Neutral) *Jet Freight Logistics:* Company has agreed to acquire a 45% stake in Natwest Trade & Logistics Services – FZCO for Rs. 18 crore, payable in tranches over two years. (Neutral) *Belrise Industries:* QIP opens; floor price set at ₹230.79 per share. (Neutral) *Signature Global:* Pre-sales at ₹1,970 cr vs ₹1,570 cr, up 25% QoQ. (Neutral) *HEG:* Company's TACC Unit Gets 'IND A-' Rating for Major Battery Material Project. (Neutral) *SJVN:* Company has received notices from BSE and NSE imposing fines for non-compliance with certain SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015. The Board has taken note of the notices and approved the company's response. (Neutral) *Texmaco Rail:* Kishor Kumar Rajgaria resigns as CFO. (Neutral) *Tata Elxsi:* Net profit at Rs 171 crore versus Rs 220 crore, Revenue at Rs 1,021 crore versus Rs 994 crore QoQ. (Neutral) *LTTS:* Net profit at Rs 357 crore versus Rs 332 crore, Revenue at Rs 2940 crore versus Rs 2858 crore QoQ. (Neutral) *NBCC:* Board approved the merger of HSCC into NBCC. (Neutral) *63 Moons Technologies:* Subsidiary Financial Technologies Singapore Pte Ltd acquired 79.58 lakh equity shares in unlisted subsidiary Ticker Ltd. (Neutral) *Sobha:* Board meeting scheduled on July 20, 2026 to consider Q1FY27 results and issuance of non-convertible debentures through private placement in one or more tranches. (Neutral) *State Bank of India:* Moody's affirmed the bank's long-term deposit rating at Baa3 and Baseline Credit Assessment at baa3 with a stable outlook. (Neutral) *Keystone Realtors:* CRISIL assigned a CRISIL AA-/Stable rating to the company's bank loan facilities and reaffirmed the CRISIL AA-/Stable rating on Rs 335 crore of non-convertible debentures. (Neutral) *Just Dial:* Irage Broking Services LLP net sold 2,87,355 shares at Rs. 765.25 per share. (Neutral) List of stocks included in the short term ASM Framework: Kalyan Jewellers, C.E. Info Systems. (Neutral) List of stocks excluded from ASM Framework: EPack Prefab, Amir Chand Jagdish Kumar (Exports) Limited. (Neutral) Circuit filter change from 20% to 10%: Just Dial Limited. (Neutral) *Utkarsh Small Finance Bank:* CARE Ratings downgraded the rating. (Negative) *Jain Resource Recycling:* Company informed about a furnace explosion at its manufacturing facility in Tamil Nadu. (Negative) *ICICI Lombard:* An arbitral tribunal directed the company to pay Rs 78 crore to an insured party along with interest at 7.5% per annum. (Negative) *IT Sector Stocks:* IBM announced weak early quarter numbers with cautious guidance. (Negative)

• 
  ADEBAYO101 (@ADEBAYO1018) reported 17 minutes ago

  @grok I want you help me build NatWest debit card exactly and the name on it shod be Nicholas baker

• 
  Matthew Burrows (@MJBurrows) reported 18 minutes ago

  Why is #NatWest down 4% today on a £2bn profit beat? When markets ditch a beat, they're pricing what the headline missed. Here's what you need to know.

• 
  Kenne_A (@StMollyBloom) reported 22 minutes ago

  This Cian_UTD bollocks doing the rounds, and I’ve got to say I don’t believe the majority of it, but if true, and Betfred and NatWest are looking at reimbursing and even compensating him, they’re setting themselves up for a real shitstorm. Anyone who’s ever known an addict of anything will know that it’s ultimately up to themselves to help themselves. And what BF and NatWest are seemingly about to do is set up a precedent where any gambler can freeroll the bookies and the banks by Gamstop’ing themselves, working around it, and recouping any losses. Why would you not? If I can deposit £5k to a bookies and go all out to try triple it in an evening knowing they have to refund me if I lose I’d be an idiot not to. Situation here should be as followed. Thorough investigation, apology if in the wrong and a review of their internal flagging system. And instead of a refund, assistance to Cian to get help with his addiction. Cian has been on the timeline for a long while with one grift or the other. If he comes out of this even or ahead he’s learned nothing. And in a few months time he’ll hit one of the other bookies with the same story. And someone help his ******* kid.

• 
  Melvyn Newell (@melv66722) reported 23 minutes ago

  @Londonist @DCBMEP “…began in 1971. ..nine years to realise.” (Working closely with Seiferts from 1975, as PQS for the now the Sea Containers Hotel, I was told that the delay in the NatWest Tower was as a result of a redesign for the tower footprint to match the new NatWest logo).

• 
  ParteekNotPrateek (@randomcricfacts) reported 36 minutes ago

  @Weirdgripping84 159 gave him a good run but Natwest **** show should have been the end of him. The fact that Laxman also kept failing in 2002 is what helped pip it in Mongia’s favor coz he bowled.

• 
  Magic hat 🎩 (@themagic_tophat) reported 36 minutes ago

  𝗪𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗠𝗮𝗻 𝗖𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝟭𝟭𝟱 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻? I know a certain commentator on the case (who claims insider knowledge) asserts there’s been no decision as of 2 weeks ago. But I very much doubt an initial decision is still pending - I believe it’s been issued to parties. There’s no reason why we would hear if it had. Initial decisions have never been published or leaked prior to the Final Award before. Why do I think it’s been issued? Because it’s been more than 19 months since the hearing concluded. A delay as long as 19 months for an initial decision on liability would put the integrity of the decision at risk and would raise questions over the arbitrators’ intentions (did they delay on purpose to damage it). I just can’t see them having done that. For context, NatWest Markets plc v Bilta (UK) Ltd [2021] was ordered a retrial when its decision was still waiting after 19 months at the High Court. The Master of Rolls at the Court of Appeal absolutely blasted the delay. He said decisions like these should need a good reason to take over 3 months in the courts and if they do, they get closely monitored. For it to take this long in private arbitration when there’s a requirement in the rules for a decision as soon as practicable… and the arbitrators have been working on other cases… totally inexcusable if it weren’t already out. Career enders for the arbitrators. A hearing on sanctions and final award should be quick too. So no excuses. Only 3 possibilities I see: 1) Initial decision was already issued to parties and a Final Award is coming imminently. Before the season starts. 2) They have the Final Award already but they’re waiting for the end of the World Cup before publishing it (they shouldn’t do this and it could even open themselves up to damages if this were the case) 3) City launched an appeal after the decision on liability was issued but before the hearing on sanctions, thereby delaying a Final Award Number 3) would be novel (i.e., never done before) but the rules do not explicitly prohibit it. I’ve hypothesised it as a possibility for a while. If so, we might not hear anything until 2027. The longer it goes without a Final Award, the more likely I believe that’s what’s happened.

• 
  Lorraine Morris (@MLorrM) reported 37 minutes ago

  In the case of Perks v NatWest Markets Plc (evidence given around 2022), Mr Neil Graham — a GRG director, chartered accountant and experienced banker — was cross-examined under oath about the bank’s RMP credit system entries for swap-related credit lines / contingent obligations (often referred to as CLU – Credit Line Utilisation). Key exchanges reported in the materials include: 🔹Mr Graham accepted that the credit-line entry on the RMP system represented the client’s contingent obligation. 🔹Mr Graham agreed it was a factor the bank used when considering in loan-to-value calculations for the overall connection. 🔹When asked whether it could push a connection over a loan-to-value ratio covenant, he answered (subject to market movements) yes. 🔹He further accepted that this could ultimately lead to the connection being transferred into GRG. 🔹Mr Graham is experienced and the testimony is truthful; however, as happened in Ireland - bank’s counsel later attempted to “distance the bank from this evidence in closing submissions”. 🔹Surprise, surprise but bank’s counsel is categorically misleading the Court. 🔹They characterised Graham’s answers as given “on the hoof,” - said it was not his specialist area and submitted that he was wrong on the LTV impact point. 🔹They argued the bank did not accept that the CLU had the effect claimed and that there was no duty to volunteer information about it to the customer. 🔹This was what bank counsel is required to do to keep the charade going and that they cavalierly do so is a scandal in itself. 🔹Mr Graham’s testimony exists and is on the public record, as circulated by campaigners and referenced in related presentations. 🔹So, a senior bank director & chartered accountant with a GRG/risk-adjacent role did accept under oath that the credit line could cause or contribute to an LTV breach and subsequent transfer into GRG. 🔹This is rather obvious and is in fact why the products were sold in the first instance - as confirmed by numerous insiders. 🔹NatWest’s formal position in that case (and more generally) has been to treat such lines as “internal risk measures” rather than customer-facing hard liabilities that automatically breach covenants in the way alleged, and to reject the broader fraud characterisation. But that would be their formal position would it not? When billions of euros is at stake? 🔹Meanwhile customers faced enormous break costs & this fact alone is wholly inconsistent with the characterisation of the credit line as a purely internal risk measure. 🔹It is however consistent with the reality, which is that the bank had booked (and later crystallised) an exposure against their customers and the credit line had been concealed. 🔹That bank counsel filed pleadings that falsely characterised these structures as just fixing an interest rate or just ordinary fixed-rate loans, facilitating the burying of the misrepresentations under layers of legal process - is a further scandal - akin to that whereby the lawyers who managed to lock up innocent sub-postmasters on foot of unsound evidence. 🔹The result for Irish SMEs duped by theses practices was a systematic extraction of value from those SMEs - while the guilty institution and its lawyers ensured that accountability remained permanently out of reach. @ArturNadol7566 @Wftproof