Post Office outages and service status in Southampton, England
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
Full Outage Map
- Post Office generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Southampton, including 0 direct reports.
Post Office offers home phone and broadband internet service, as well as financial services including savings, loans and credit cards.
Problems in the last 24 hours in Southampton, England
The chart below shows the number of Post Office reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Southampton, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Post Office. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Post Office Issues Reports Near Southampton, England
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Southampton and nearby locations:
-
The Dead Pigeon Society) (@DeadPigeonSoc) reported from Fareham, England@UBn9ohogz0XOFWP @PostOffice Totally agree!! Seriously bad and ill thought out advertising tactics from the Post Office! 😡
-
Keith Mitchell (@KeithMitchell_) reported from East Cowes, EnglandTravelling need to redirect mail from a temporary address at end of redirecting period on line @PostOffice and @RoyalMail #CustomerService appalling can’t help me complete waste of time
-
Romsey Town Council (@destinationroms) reported from Romsey, EnglandWe have used this service at #Romsey @PostOffice fantastic service from fab staff
-
Shell. Ice Skating Is The Best (@ShellLovesCats) reported from Lymington, England@PostOffice is there a known issue with post office broadband? Went down half hr ago, comes back briefly few mins at most with weak signal then gone again
-
Jules Field (@JulesFM) reported from Southampton, England@PostOffice After Amzn repeatedly sending stock responses teaching me how to use pickup locations, I finally got their "the customer is well pissed off" stock response, which asked me to call them. I've explained in words of 1 syllable & they are going to look into it. Will let you know!
-
Jules Field (@JulesFM) reported from Southampton, England@PostOffice They still show as an option, but when you select that particular one it then fails to appear as where you want it delivered to. Not just me, happens to others too. Other POs seem fine (e.g. Portswood down the road).
-
Rahim™ 🇬🇧🇲🇦 (@rahim94) reported from Southampton, England@_bowandarrows_ @PostOffice meh... I'm done with them. there's bigger issues atm as you've probably seen recently
-
Pip Richardson (@PipRichardson) reported from Southampton, England@PostOffice seriously can’t believe you are not allowed to lend pens out to customers because of #COVID__19 . #gooddeedforday just lent another customer my pen! She was so grateful ... #littiethings that matter !
-
Dean Daniels (@DanielsDeanJ) reported from New Milton, England@PostOffice Thanks but the website kept falling over with an error message, my complaint is lengthy and involves missing cheques. Can it only be submitted this way?
-
Bryn Jones🏴🇬🇧🇪🇺🏳️🌈 (@Brynwales) reported from East Cowes, England@coldhardfacts7 @PostOffice @DVLAgovuk Richard I asked a question I didn't require abuse #idiot
Post Office Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Artur Nadolny (@ArturNadol7566) reportedPOST OFFICE REWRITES ITS OWN SCANDAL I was reading through the Post Office Process Review page on the corporate @PostOffice website when one paragraph was cought my attention... The PPR, was set up after the Common Issues Judgment in March 2019, the ruling that came out of Alan Bates and others versus Post Office Limited and first forced Post Office to admit its Horizon accounting system was unreliable and that postmasters had been wrongly blamed for shortfalls the system itself created. "Since the Common Issues Judgment in March 2019, we have carried out work across the business to identify products, policies or processes that may have caused financial loss to Postmasters because of the way they were designed or delivered." The background section on the page says Post Office has carried out work to identify products, policies or processes that may have caused financial loss to postmasters because of the way they were designed or delivered. That phrasing removes Post Office as the party doing the designing and delivering. The losses did not just happen because of how something was designed, Post Office designed it. "We wish to put this right in a straightforward and transparent way, and we have therefore set up the Post Office Process Review to provide financial redress for current and former Postmasters who were impacted." A line further down says Post Office wishes to put this right in a straightforward and transparent way. That reads as voluntary goodwill. What actually happened is a court judgment forced Post Office to admit fault after years of fighting the litigation that proved it, and the PPR exists because of that judgment, not out of an independent wish to be transparent. "You may be aware that there have also been other redress schemes available for people impacted by the Horizon IT Scandal. You can submit a request to the Post Office Process Review whether or not you have separately received a payment or have a case in progress through any of those other redress schemes." Then comes the paragraph that caught my attention most. It tells readers there have also been other redress schemes available for people impacted by the Horizon IT Scandal, and that a postmaster can apply to the PPR whether or not they have already received a payment through one of those other schemes. Read on its own, with no background on the case, this makes Post Office sound like an intermediary. Something called the Horizon IT Scandal happened to postmasters, and Post Office is now helping them access redress for it, alongside other schemes that also exist to help. Post Office built and ran the Horizon system. Post Office prosecuted postmasters using data from that system. Post Office fought the litigation that eventually proved the system was flawed, for years, at public expense, before the judgment forced its hand. The redress schemes named here, including the PPR itself, exist because Post Office caused the losses they compensate. The page also treats the PPR issues and the Horizon IT Scandal as two separate subjects, one involving products, policies and processes, the other a scandal that happened elsewhere, to other people, through other schemes. A postmaster or anybody else reading this without prior context could reasonably conclude that Post Office is a well-meaning administrator cleaning up a mess it did not create. Most people who land on this page are not journalists or campaigners. They are current or former postmasters, or their family members, trying to work out if they are owed money and how to ask for it, and many will not have followed the litigation, the public inquiry, or the years of reporting that established what actually happened. For that reader, the framing on this page is the information. If it tells them Post Office is helping victims of a scandal rather than admitting to causing one, that is what they will take away, and it will shape how much scrutiny they think the process deserves. Post Office has spent years controlling how this story gets told, first by denying there was a problem at all, then by fighting compensation claims, and now by writing its own compensation scheme in language that keeps the institution at arm's length from what it did. The wording on this page is small. The pattern is not.
-
katrina taylor (@katrinaxtaylor) reported@ArturNadol7566 @PostOffice From David Davis and the ***** whois now a vicar right down through middle management they ALL ought to be stripped of their assets and put in jail.
-
Lou (@Louise71James) reported@lily_lna @PostOffice **** that! No topless yes ok, more than reasonable for a female lol. Any other attire in THE UK, should not be a problem. ***** pervs too worried about getting a hard on over a girls backless outfit! **** off to your backwards country! Omg makes me so angry!
-
Sara (@SLtf202521551) reported@lily_lna @PostOffice I wonder if you offended someone’s religion or culture 🙄 As a customer you can wear whatever you please.
-
The_Real_Bale (@Davebale) reported@Nautigal56 @lily_lna @PostOffice Grok is just confirming the post is true, because she ******* wrote it **** you people are dumb!🫣 . .
-
AreWeThereYet? (@YetAre45328) reported@lily_lna @PostOffice Need to write that you're a customer! Wear what you want to buy a stamp FFS!
-
Kevin cubbin (@Kevincubbin2) reported@ArturNadol7566 @PostOffice Was disgusting how they were treated no amount of compensation will fix what happened to them ..but good luck and keep fighting.
-
JSR 🛕 🇮🇳 ⚔ (@JS02Hyd) reported@NCMIndiaa NonStop corruption for ₹500-₹3000 Why not hav a robust procedure. Recommended: HOME verification,done by @IndiaPostOffice for ₹100-200 fee PostOffice NOC online& T+1 day Police commissioner NOC to MEA MEA prints passport,T+2 + Post issue,Verify Annual
-
அமுதன் (@Amuthan2657) reported@AmazonHelp my order 403-4692438-1716323,I received a very poor-quality/suspected fake productDOCTOR FEEL SOFT I initiated a return, but Amazon is asking me to send through the PostOffice.This is not possible for me.arrange doorstep pickup and process my full refund immediately.
-
Yep my name is Guy 😊🌸🥕 (@MyNamesGuy) reported@ArturNadol7566 @PostOffice I have worked in software for 35+ years. The people supporting, fixing and amending the software would have known there was a defect but kept it concealed - I am guessing they were told to shut up or not investigate the issue.