Post Office outages and service status in Milford Haven, Wales
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
Full Outage Map
- Post Office generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Milford Haven, including 0 direct reports.
Post Office offers home phone and broadband internet service, as well as financial services including savings, loans and credit cards.
Problems in the last 24 hours in Milford Haven, Wales
The chart below shows the number of Post Office reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Milford Haven, Wales and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Post Office. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Post Office Issues Reports Near Milford Haven, Wales
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Milford Haven and nearby locations:
-
Andrew Lye #FBPE (@AndrewLye) reported from Burton, Wales@RoyalMailHelp @PostOffice That's a nice way to treat a RM shareholder and customer of the PO and RM.
Post Office Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Steve 🏴 (@SteveC080624) reported@lily_lna @PostOffice Backless, but hardly immoral. Jealousy is a terrible thing.
-
Artur Nadolny (@ArturNadol7566) reportedPOST OFFICE REWRITES ITS OWN SCANDAL I was reading through the Post Office Process Review page on the corporate @PostOffice website when one paragraph was cought my attention... The PPR, was set up after the Common Issues Judgment in March 2019, the ruling that came out of Alan Bates and others versus Post Office Limited and first forced Post Office to admit its Horizon accounting system was unreliable and that postmasters had been wrongly blamed for shortfalls the system itself created. "Since the Common Issues Judgment in March 2019, we have carried out work across the business to identify products, policies or processes that may have caused financial loss to Postmasters because of the way they were designed or delivered." The background section on the page says Post Office has carried out work to identify products, policies or processes that may have caused financial loss to postmasters because of the way they were designed or delivered. That phrasing removes Post Office as the party doing the designing and delivering. The losses did not just happen because of how something was designed, Post Office designed it. "We wish to put this right in a straightforward and transparent way, and we have therefore set up the Post Office Process Review to provide financial redress for current and former Postmasters who were impacted." A line further down says Post Office wishes to put this right in a straightforward and transparent way. That reads as voluntary goodwill. What actually happened is a court judgment forced Post Office to admit fault after years of fighting the litigation that proved it, and the PPR exists because of that judgment, not out of an independent wish to be transparent. "You may be aware that there have also been other redress schemes available for people impacted by the Horizon IT Scandal. You can submit a request to the Post Office Process Review whether or not you have separately received a payment or have a case in progress through any of those other redress schemes." Then comes the paragraph that caught my attention most. It tells readers there have also been other redress schemes available for people impacted by the Horizon IT Scandal, and that a postmaster can apply to the PPR whether or not they have already received a payment through one of those other schemes. Read on its own, with no background on the case, this makes Post Office sound like an intermediary. Something called the Horizon IT Scandal happened to postmasters, and Post Office is now helping them access redress for it, alongside other schemes that also exist to help. Post Office built and ran the Horizon system. Post Office prosecuted postmasters using data from that system. Post Office fought the litigation that eventually proved the system was flawed, for years, at public expense, before the judgment forced its hand. The redress schemes named here, including the PPR itself, exist because Post Office caused the losses they compensate. The page also treats the PPR issues and the Horizon IT Scandal as two separate subjects, one involving products, policies and processes, the other a scandal that happened elsewhere, to other people, through other schemes. A postmaster or anybody else reading this without prior context could reasonably conclude that Post Office is a well-meaning administrator cleaning up a mess it did not create. Most people who land on this page are not journalists or campaigners. They are current or former postmasters, or their family members, trying to work out if they are owed money and how to ask for it, and many will not have followed the litigation, the public inquiry, or the years of reporting that established what actually happened. For that reader, the framing on this page is the information. If it tells them Post Office is helping victims of a scandal rather than admitting to causing one, that is what they will take away, and it will shape how much scrutiny they think the process deserves. Post Office has spent years controlling how this story gets told, first by denying there was a problem at all, then by fighting compensation claims, and now by writing its own compensation scheme in language that keeps the institution at arm's length from what it did. The wording on this page is small. The pattern is not.
-
(((robingillis)))✡🦁🐇🐱 (@sweepybuns) reported@Rob_ThaBuilder @lily_lna @PostOffice She's a CUSTOMER.
-
mainenewshound (@mainenewshound) reported@WGME Cant prove it. 'Some group from outside of Maine' pulls their Useful Idiot Maine Officials prions aside, instructs them how to sue for this and that. That Local Yokel from a small state,Maine,did not come up with this idea to sue the PostOffice within their own mind--No way, lol!
-
DoubleH (@HdubbsH) reported@RobsRips the issue is the postoffice system doesn't know how to track ESE Im waiting on something shipped 10days ago the only thing that was updated was there was an origin processing which only confirmed they have it
-
RLK (@RLK303303) reportedAn update regarding the wearing of a backless dress on Post Office premises. Apparently the note has been taken down ‘for now’. Why would a backless dress make anyone feel uncomfortable? A bit of a non-response from @PostOffice - it doesn’t really answer any questions, nor does it make explicit, a stance on this.
-
shanti (@imshanti_01) reportedA disabled woman went to the postoffice to post important documents but was turned away citing server down. 💔 This is the situation even in the era of 5G. Imagine that sometimes the server is down, how far the world has progressed and this is it. The woman kept saying, Sir, how will I come again, I have come with great difficulty, but the post office people did not listen to her at all. They said the time is over, should we come tomorrow? These people could not understand the pain of a disabled woman. Couldn't you have taken her documents and posted them? Was the poor girl so helpless and still you didn't help her? Please tell me whether action should be taken against such postmaster or not.
-
B30 (@B30_603) reported@twasthentisnow @lily_lna @PostOffice Funny. I read it as she was a customer. Why don't you take a look and figure out why you misread it?
-
Scunnered (@sunnybears81) reported@lily_lna @PostOffice Was the post office attached to a corner store by any chance? I know who wrote this note. We just can’t say it or we get in trouble. Guys can walks out topless. **** off with the double standards!
-
MoveForward2026 (@forward20282654) reported@lily_lna @twasthentisnow @PostOffice Why didn’t you make that clear on your OP. As a customer , the shop have no business telling you that you can’t wear that outfit. As an employee they may require you to dress in work attire . And it’s “backless”, not “blackless”.