Post Office outages and service status in Bristol, England
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
Full Outage Map
- Post Office generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Bristol, including 0 direct reports.
Post Office offers home phone and broadband internet service, as well as financial services including savings, loans and credit cards.
Problems in the last 24 hours in Bristol, England
The chart below shows the number of Post Office reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Bristol, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Post Office. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
Post Office Issues Reports Near Bristol, England
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Bristol and nearby locations:
-
Ami Davis (@amiloudavis) reported from Bristol, England@PostOffice … please help with my mission impossible. 1/2 Driving licence won’t renew online despite multiple attempts and checks 2 weeks calling and not once could I get through Email response after 3 days, you have to go to Post Office
-
Sarah Ambe 🌹🇪🇺 (@sarahambe70) reported from Bristol, EnglandSo I bought stamps from the online @PostOffice website and I was really surprised to see that they were delivered by @UPS , nothing like not trusting your own delivery service 😂
-
Liam Hall (@MunkeyKungFu) reported from Bristol, England@RoyalMailHelp @PostOffice It's only taken 1 month!!! But you have finally scanned my item, not acceptable service!
-
Dave (@DavidPenton1) reported from Bristol, EnglandBeen trying to top up my @BritishGas electric since Saturday but the @Payzone_UK machines aren’t working and @PostOffice are closing, never had this issue with @PayPoint! What the hell @BritishGasHelp
-
Nick Cox (@nick15cox) reported from Bristol, England@parcelforce Sincere thanks for your truly shocking service in collaboration with @PostOffice. Phone up to provide instructions, opposite of these instructions carried out. Costs time and money. Great 🙃
-
Stephen Carter (@Stephen2791) reported from Bristol, England@PostOffice utter appalling level of service. Customers services none existent. You get it’s not my problem. You should be stripped of your royal approval not deserving of it. Still no parcel either and left in total limbo. Very argue.
-
B K (@Bla1s0) reported from Bristol, England@PostOffice No it's ok, I'll just use another travel insurance company. Your online portal for renewing has been down for a few weeks anyway, and I had a similar reply regarding that from your customer "service" over the phone. #notinterested
-
Lee Collins (@LCollins75) reported from Midsomer Norton, EnglandCongratulations to all the sub-post masters/mistresses for having their day in court and beating The Post Office Counters Ltd hands down. Shame on you. Now hit them where it hurts. Cough up Post office. You own them deep. Saying sorry is not enough @PostOffice @PostOfficeNews
-
Keir 🔸 (@KGravil) reported from Bristol, England@RoyalMail @PostOffice you guys have provided abysmal service lately. I organised redelivery to my local branch of a tracked item, it's been signed for at the Post Office yesterday and lost. Keep getting 'it'll be here tomorrow' excuses. When presented with evidence of delivery..
Post Office Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Lloyd Wilson (@LloydWi40203447) reported@ArturNadol7566 @FielderMarianne @PostOffice A phrase used too often but an absolute travesty of justice! This campaign for PO workers need re-energising so the poor people can get some closure & justice. How could we let this happen in our country. It is a National Scandal & those responsible must, must pay the price!
-
YawningChasm (@NoWorseThanYou) reported@lily_lna @PostOffice They put a note on their own notice board while you were in the shop.. and then what ? Pointed at the sign and said ‘hey’ ? People will believe any crap at all these days
-
NiceMarmot 🇮🇱 (@JMLoe1) reported@TERFSMURF_3 @lily_lna @PostOffice You can be refused entry to restaurants though, if the dress code says no casual clothing, or wear a tie - I have never known if this is legal, or if so why restaurants differ from any other retail space in this respect?
-
Colin Butler, CSCS (@foxygrandpafit) reported@lily_lna @PostOffice This is ridiculous because I wore the same thing at Post Office and didn't have any issues.
-
Lou (@Louise71James) reported@lily_lna @PostOffice **** that! No topless yes ok, more than reasonable for a female lol. Any other attire in THE UK, should not be a problem. ***** pervs too worried about getting a hard on over a girls backless outfit! **** off to your backwards country! Omg makes me so angry!
-
pompanoj (@pompanoj) reported@twasthentisnow @lily_lna @PostOffice Reading further, she is a customer. In which case the manager has lost her mind. It is a store, not a church. T-shirt and flip flops, sports bra and tights, or bikini top and cutoff shorts... doesnt matter. Just sell me my stamps.
-
Keira Connolly (@keira_con) reportedWow @PostOffice I see a well dressed woman who could be on her way to an event or a wedding using your services would you treat a person who spent the day on a beach who was wearing a wrap the same way. ?
-
RLK (@RLK303303) reported@HarrovianTERF @PostOffice This is for a customer.
-
CJ (@CarolynOgden) reported@JamesMelville Totally agree. I tried to help a 93 lady. Bright and chatty not IT literate, couldn’t pay her TV licence at our local PostOffice so drove her to CoOp. Didn’t have a bar code do we gave up. She said “the world is against me now I am old” broke my heart @PatrickChristys
-
Artur Nadolny (@ArturNadol7566) reportedPOST OFFICE REWRITES ITS OWN SCANDAL I was reading through the Post Office Process Review page on the corporate @PostOffice website when one paragraph was cought my attention... The PPR, was set up after the Common Issues Judgment in March 2019, the ruling that came out of Alan Bates and others versus Post Office Limited and first forced Post Office to admit its Horizon accounting system was unreliable and that postmasters had been wrongly blamed for shortfalls the system itself created. "Since the Common Issues Judgment in March 2019, we have carried out work across the business to identify products, policies or processes that may have caused financial loss to Postmasters because of the way they were designed or delivered." The background section on the page says Post Office has carried out work to identify products, policies or processes that may have caused financial loss to postmasters because of the way they were designed or delivered. That phrasing removes Post Office as the party doing the designing and delivering. The losses did not just happen because of how something was designed, Post Office designed it. "We wish to put this right in a straightforward and transparent way, and we have therefore set up the Post Office Process Review to provide financial redress for current and former Postmasters who were impacted." A line further down says Post Office wishes to put this right in a straightforward and transparent way. That reads as voluntary goodwill. What actually happened is a court judgment forced Post Office to admit fault after years of fighting the litigation that proved it, and the PPR exists because of that judgment, not out of an independent wish to be transparent. "You may be aware that there have also been other redress schemes available for people impacted by the Horizon IT Scandal. You can submit a request to the Post Office Process Review whether or not you have separately received a payment or have a case in progress through any of those other redress schemes." Then comes the paragraph that caught my attention most. It tells readers there have also been other redress schemes available for people impacted by the Horizon IT Scandal, and that a postmaster can apply to the PPR whether or not they have already received a payment through one of those other schemes. Read on its own, with no background on the case, this makes Post Office sound like an intermediary. Something called the Horizon IT Scandal happened to postmasters, and Post Office is now helping them access redress for it, alongside other schemes that also exist to help. Post Office built and ran the Horizon system. Post Office prosecuted postmasters using data from that system. Post Office fought the litigation that eventually proved the system was flawed, for years, at public expense, before the judgment forced its hand. The redress schemes named here, including the PPR itself, exist because Post Office caused the losses they compensate. The page also treats the PPR issues and the Horizon IT Scandal as two separate subjects, one involving products, policies and processes, the other a scandal that happened elsewhere, to other people, through other schemes. A postmaster or anybody else reading this without prior context could reasonably conclude that Post Office is a well-meaning administrator cleaning up a mess it did not create. Most people who land on this page are not journalists or campaigners. They are current or former postmasters, or their family members, trying to work out if they are owed money and how to ask for it, and many will not have followed the litigation, the public inquiry, or the years of reporting that established what actually happened. For that reader, the framing on this page is the information. If it tells them Post Office is helping victims of a scandal rather than admitting to causing one, that is what they will take away, and it will shape how much scrutiny they think the process deserves. Post Office has spent years controlling how this story gets told, first by denying there was a problem at all, then by fighting compensation claims, and now by writing its own compensation scheme in language that keeps the institution at arm's length from what it did. The wording on this page is small. The pattern is not.