1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. Post Office
  4. Craigavon
Post Office

Post Office outages and service status in Craigavon, Northern Ireland

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map
  • Post Office generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Craigavon, including 0 direct reports.

Post Office offers home phone and broadband internet service, as well as financial services including savings, loans and credit cards.

Problems in the last 24 hours in Craigavon, Northern Ireland

The chart below shows the number of Post Office reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Craigavon, Northern Ireland and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at Post Office. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Post Office Issues Reports Near Craigavon, Northern Ireland

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Craigavon and nearby locations:

  • BaronSealand
    Baron of Sealand (@BaronSealand) reported from Lurgan, Northern Ireland

    @ApeGilded @PostOffice Well, intelligence dropped quickly there! You mean Royal Mail my dear! The Post Office is where Your mother collected her child support, which obviously didn’t go on your education!

Post Office Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • ArturNadol7566
    Artur Nadolny (@ArturNadol7566) reported

    POST OFFICE REWRITES ITS OWN SCANDAL I was reading through the Post Office Process Review page on the corporate @PostOffice website when one paragraph was cought my attention... The PPR, was set up after the Common Issues Judgment in March 2019, the ruling that came out of Alan Bates and others versus Post Office Limited and first forced Post Office to admit its Horizon accounting system was unreliable and that postmasters had been wrongly blamed for shortfalls the system itself created. "Since the Common Issues Judgment in March 2019, we have carried out work across the business to identify products, policies or processes that may have caused financial loss to Postmasters because of the way they were designed or delivered." The background section on the page says Post Office has carried out work to identify products, policies or processes that may have caused financial loss to postmasters because of the way they were designed or delivered. That phrasing removes Post Office as the party doing the designing and delivering. The losses did not just happen because of how something was designed, Post Office designed it. "We wish to put this right in a straightforward and transparent way, and we have therefore set up the Post Office Process Review to provide financial redress for current and former Postmasters who were impacted." A line further down says Post Office wishes to put this right in a straightforward and transparent way. That reads as voluntary goodwill. What actually happened is a court judgment forced Post Office to admit fault after years of fighting the litigation that proved it, and the PPR exists because of that judgment, not out of an independent wish to be transparent. "You may be aware that there have also been other redress schemes available for people impacted by the Horizon IT Scandal. You can submit a request to the Post Office Process Review whether or not you have separately received a payment or have a case in progress through any of those other redress schemes." Then comes the paragraph that caught my attention most. It tells readers there have also been other redress schemes available for people impacted by the Horizon IT Scandal, and that a postmaster can apply to the PPR whether or not they have already received a payment through one of those other schemes. Read on its own, with no background on the case, this makes Post Office sound like an intermediary. Something called the Horizon IT Scandal happened to postmasters, and Post Office is now helping them access redress for it, alongside other schemes that also exist to help. Post Office built and ran the Horizon system. Post Office prosecuted postmasters using data from that system. Post Office fought the litigation that eventually proved the system was flawed, for years, at public expense, before the judgment forced its hand. The redress schemes named here, including the PPR itself, exist because Post Office caused the losses they compensate. The page also treats the PPR issues and the Horizon IT Scandal as two separate subjects, one involving products, policies and processes, the other a scandal that happened elsewhere, to other people, through other schemes. A postmaster or anybody else reading this without prior context could reasonably conclude that Post Office is a well-meaning administrator cleaning up a mess it did not create. Most people who land on this page are not journalists or campaigners. They are current or former postmasters, or their family members, trying to work out if they are owed money and how to ask for it, and many will not have followed the litigation, the public inquiry, or the years of reporting that established what actually happened. For that reader, the framing on this page is the information. If it tells them Post Office is helping victims of a scandal rather than admitting to causing one, that is what they will take away, and it will shape how much scrutiny they think the process deserves. Post Office has spent years controlling how this story gets told, first by denying there was a problem at all, then by fighting compensation claims, and now by writing its own compensation scheme in language that keeps the institution at arm's length from what it did. The wording on this page is small. The pattern is not.

  • StellaOShea1
    Inevitable Stella (@StellaOShea1) reported

    @lily_lna @PostOffice Why do you dress up in a posh evening dress to nip down to the local post office?

  • PierceDargan_
    Pierce Dargan (@PierceDargan_) reported

    Stepaside Post Office Closure Update I was very disappointed to see the post office in Stepaside closed this morning. Minister Richmond and I had a call with An Post this morning. They have been working with the postmaster and landowner in an effort to keep the post office open. Unfortunately no viable solution has been found which is why the post office has closed today. However Minister Richmond and I have received a commitment from A Post that they recognise the need for a post office in Stepaside or the immediate surrounding area. In the meantime post office services are available in Ballaly, Dundrum, Ballinteer and Cabinteely. Minister Richmond and I will continue to do everything we can to secure a post office back in Stepaside and ensure our community has the local postal services it needs. We understand how important this service is to the local community and we will keep pushing for a solution. #Local #Community #PostOffice

  • secularmammal
    Secularis Occidentalis (@secularmammal) reported

    @lily_lna @PostOffice When I last checked this was still the UK, despite the best efforts of successive governments to turn it into something else. So no, you're not wrong, you're entirely in the right and within your rights. It's the proprietors who are are the problem. Thanks for highlighting this.

  • JaneHew72838273
    snow white xxx (@JaneHew72838273) reported

    @PostOffice @lily_lna Withdraw their franchise @postoffice. This is unacceptable. Retraining wouldn't help.

  • fyleman
    lalaland 👑 (@fyleman) reported

    @lily_lna @PostOffice OMG I'm SHOCKED.... I saw this story elsewhere and I thought u were an EMPLOYEE (& I said that, while u look lovely, I didn't feel it was appropriate BUSINESS WEAR) But I'd misunderstood!! As a CUSTOMER, OF COURSE YOU ARE APPROPRIATELY DRESSED I hope u take this up with the PO🤬

  • SteveC080624
    Steve 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿 (@SteveC080624) reported

    @lily_lna @PostOffice Backless, but hardly immoral. Jealousy is a terrible thing.

  • ArturNadol7566
    Artur Nadolny (@ArturNadol7566) reported

    POST OFFICE SENT INVESTIGATORS TO SEARCH A FRIDGE FOR MONEY Sharon Brown and Kevin Brown took over their Post Office branch in Pennywell, Sunderland, in 2006. A few years in, the Horizon system @PostOffice started showing shortfalls. Sharon assumed the fault was hers. By 2012 she was suspended over a £36k discrepancy that never existed. Investigators arrived at her home. They searched the fridge. They went through the kitchen cupboards. All hunting for cash that was never gone in the first place, because a computer glitch does not hide in a Tupperware box. Sharon and Kevin used their life savings to pay back a debt invented by a faulty IT system. Kevin called it "a massive black hole." They are still in debt today. Two charging orders remain on their home. Sharon has spoken about the period around 2013 and 2014 when the stress brought her close to taking her own life. What stopped her was a photo of her sons, Adam and Callum, on the wall. She has said "I wouldn't be sitting with you now" if she hadn't seen it. Their old branch doesn't exist anymore. It's a shop selling vapes, cakes and milkshakes now, lit up with a rainbow LED sign. Sharon went back to see it once. Her heart was racing before the car even stopped. She no longer speaks to family members who doubted her at the time. No fridge search fixes a debt that was fake from the start. No apology from head office undoes 14 years of two people quietly bankrupting themselves over a software bug. The Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry @PostOffInquiry keeps hearing stories exactly like this one. Post Office keeps saying sorry. Sharon and Kevin keep paying off a debt that a computer made up. SOURCES @BBCNews and others.

  • NotArguing9
    Not Arguing 🐭 (@NotArguing9) reported

    @lily_lna @PostOffice I read this first as you being an employee. That would be a tad scandalous. As a customer? It's amazing. Not scandalous at all. And even if it were, not their concern.

  • sheldinij
    Sheldini (@sheldinij) reported

    @lily_lna @twasthentisnow @PostOffice Its jealousy from post office staff, who've probably never been allowed to show any flesh!