AOL outages and service status in Sidcup, England
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
Full Outage Map
- AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Sidcup, including 0 direct reports.
- The most common problems reported in this area mention E-mail.
- E-mail (100%)
AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.
Problems in the last 24 hours in Sidcup, England
The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Sidcup, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Live Outage Map Near Sidcup, England
The most recent AOL outage reports came from the following cities: Bexleyheath.
| City | Problem Type | Report Time |
|---|---|---|
 Bexleyheath
|
21 days ago | |
|
Southwark
|
4 months ago | |
|
Newham
|
5 months ago | |
|
Newham
|
5 months ago | |
|
Croydon
|
Internet | 5 months ago |
|
Croydon
|
Internet | 5 months ago |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
AOL Issues Reports Near Sidcup, England
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Sidcup and nearby locations:
-
Tom Broad (@broad_thomas) reported from Bexleyheath, England@AOLSupportHelp hi we have forgotten our aol@password tried to recover it but can’t, have no recovery details set up help please
-
steph carter (@stephca46203104) reported from Darenth, England@AOLSupportHelp I need help to access my email it’s saying the password or account isn’t correct but I can not access my recovery email address either. I’m being sent in a circle
-
Steve O (@journeymanstev1) reported from Camberwell, England@Suvvo @AOL I’m having same problem… think it’s worldwide
-
Sarah Solomon (@xSarahSolomon) reported from Camberwell, EnglandAGREED! Every kid except me had nice shiny internet...we were stuck with that shitty AOL dialup that we were only allowed to use to play Cartoon Network games on if we were good 🥴
-
Jonathan Richard (@JonRichard) reported from Bromley, England@yungcontent And Bebo never sells to AOL
-
Orrin Edenfield, an 🇺🇸 living in 🇬🇧 (@OrrinEdenfield) reported from Eltham, England@benjedwards school library had a dial-up modem (probably 9600 baud) to ISP through school district. At home was local ISP as AOL/Compuserve/etc. never had local numbers for me.
-
The Urban Kitchen (@urbankitchen) reported from Camberwell, England@ShikhaJainMD Actually got 2 - never had MySpace or AOL account!
-
Mic Wright 🏳️🌈🏴☠️ (@brokenbottleboy) reported from Poplar, EnglandWhen it first arrived — and I made a blog there within the first two months of its public existence — @tumblr was the near perfect blogging platform. Then AOL destroyed it. Now it’s a horrible jail where I can’t get rid of this dumb screen. Thanks @automatic.
-
James Freund (@jayfreund) reported from Poplar, England@AOLSupportHelp hi there having trouble accessing my emails at the moment , I’ve tried to reset my password and it won’t allow me to , could you help?
AOL Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Lazarus (@Lazarus_Capital) reported@stocktrader989 stock i responded to your tweet "The current debt, interest expense, colo fees and no chance to make profits are reasons not to invest in $CRWV and responded with: "They’ve pioneered the way for neoclouds to get financing with Iran literally copying their DDTL structure, are bringing down their weighted cost of debt, improving margins, and focusing on the higher return business (cloud vs Colo). Their debt is a function of levering up to improve their returns. Their financing ability is actually so good that they’re giving up prepayments since that would weigh down their returns. They’re playing chess while $IREN is figuring out how checkers work" Either you dont understand what im saying or deliberately trying to twist what im saying. If theyre the pioneer in financing, they will be definition (very likely) have more debt compared to "peers", also, I stated they pioneered the way for them to get financing. Im not sure why youre repeatedly trying to paint it as my bull thesis rests on them being first. No. That was a stab at Iran since they literally copied their financing structure. Setting up that if you argue against CRWV's financing, youre basically saying your darling was is following their stupidity. Up to you if you want to make that argument. "Backward looking showing massive improvement- WRONG" I literally said its backward looking in response to you looking at their recent current state financials when theyre going through a grow phase. Literally triple digit YoY rev growth, not to mention ARR and rev backlog. Q1 revs of $2b against a $100B rev backlog. Where do you think the valuation is coming from? Whats happening to their compute deals? How can you model out how much they will earn? By looking at: "Revenue Backlog, RPU & financing- doesn’t hold water". With these names you need to be looking at how theyre executing, what direction theyre going, their rate of growth, margin direction, backlog, etc. IREN for example: missing their own cloud ARR targets, GPU rental prices weakening against a bullish backdrop, ARR growth with no regards to margin, margin compression and return deterioration, lots of power sitting doing nothing while peers have sold out. NBIS for example you did something similar by showing the last 2 Qs that theyre losing money. Yes, theyre building, investment cycle, they will have negative cash flows, look beyond that. I really try to engage and help others learn, and I love to test my thesis against others, sometimes with a little sarcasm and trash talking. I addressed your debt concerns and pointed you to where the value will come from. I dont like addressing someone's concerns and they brush it off like i didnt respond, instead choosing to focus on something I didnt even say like you did here "Pioneers ofter don’t win. Examples 1. Internet- AOL/ Yahoo 2. IPhones- Blackberry 3. BTC mining- Mara $CRWV is slightly improving but still a failed company" I especially dont like when people twist my words, or worse, accuse me of "changing your argument to try to meet your objective".
-
Robby Targaryen 🐉 (@RobbyTargaryen) reportedOne time around 17 y o I went to a Paul Oakenfold show in SLC - He signed my Tranceport CD .. was in my back pocket. Robby went to not even going to lie to you a guy I liked named Robby's house. I broke the cd :( no clue where that mfcker is. I waas a heathen. the season of my life I could write a TV show for would def be this one and maybe like 1 or 2 others. BYU students / RM's blowing me up on xy / aol and Yahoo, MSN... was definitely pioneer territory. and not just because I'm from Provo. In this new age. the new way. The systems of power and control will never again allow for such debauchery. They didn't scan your ID back then. There was nothing to scan it with.
-
Nunya Bizness (@Boiler_Hoops) reported@Ross__Hendricks AOL going to go APE ****
-
🔻agitprop + absurdity🔻 (@agtprpnabsrdty) reportedDifferent decade, same math: half the S&P 500 is priced at levels that a dot-com CEO called proof of investor insanity while watching his company crater 90%. The rotation at the top: In early 2000, the ten most valuable S&P 500 companies read like a monument to permanent dominance: Microsoft, General Electric, Cisco, Walmart, ExxonMobil, Intel, Lucent, IBM, Citigroup, AOL. A generation later, only Microsoft remains. GE was carved into three separate companies. Lucent was absorbed by Nokia. AOL became the cautionary tale attached to the worst merger in corporate history. Cisco and Intel spent 25 years climbing back to their dot-com peaks. Citigroup, IBM, Walmart, and ExxonMobil still exist, but none crack the top ten. The new top ten is Nvidia, Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and the AI infrastructure complex. Investors in 2000 were also certain they were buying the future's permanent giants. The data says most of today's winners won't be in the top ten a generation from now either, and there is no mechanism by which you find out which ones survive in advance. The valuation problem: In 2002, after Sun Microsystems collapsed 90%, CEO Scott McNealy explained to investors exactly what a 10x sales multiple actually demands: 100% of revenues paid as dividends for ten consecutive years, with zero costs, zero R&D, zero taxes, and zero employees. He was describing the math of the price investors had paid for his stock as a form of collective psychosis. Today, 51% of the S&P 500 by market cap trades above 10x sales. Half the index. The AI narrative is functioning as the dot-com narrative functioned: a story compelling enough to make the math feel optional. The math has never been optional.
-
𝗫ℝℙ ℍ𝔼ℝ𝔸𝕃𝔻 (@xrp_herald) reported@Xfinancebull That’s the argument that actually matters. Yahoo, AOL, HSBC, Amex, Adobe. These aren’t crypto tourists. They’re builders who solved hard problems before XRP was even an idea. The chart is noise. The team is the signal. Always has been.
-
Marcus Sinclair (@MarcusSinclair2) reported@craiglashmet @sytaylor Good point, walled gardens like AOL fail
-
Don Fotsch 🌵🇺🇸 (@fotsch1) reported@munster_gene 1) the kids stuff is great for Brand 2) it’s too complicated 3) designed by “experts” (w/ any kids?) 4) it won’t get used much How do we know all this? We learned it all with AOL Parental Controls; was a KEY reason parents chose AOL; kids were the ones who knew it best (shutting it off); overall, minimal usage. anyone with kids, smiles at #2 above, in particular — engr, father of six, decade at Apple, five at AOL p.s. We will never see any stats on Apple/iPhone “kid safety” usage, due to points above; they’ll just keep taking about how they work with “experts”, who ironically, often have few or no, children.
-
Exencial Research Partners (@exencial_RP) reportedOpenAI Is Forecasting Something That Has Never Happened in 75 Years of Market History Morgan Stanley's Mauboussin studied every 5-year sales growth run for US public companies since 1950. Nearly 19,300 firm-period observations. Fastest ever: AOL at 103% CAGR, and even that was a merger artifact with Time Warner. OpenAI's projection: $13.1bn (2025) → $284bn (2030). An 85% CAGR from a base no company that size has ever compounded from. The earlier $184bn-by-2029 forecast implied 118%. The mean 5-year nominal CAGR in the data: 6.9%, with 11.1% standard deviation. OpenAI's forecast sits 9 to 10 standard deviations out. Mauboussin's caveat is fair, base rates are dynamic and the past doesn't make it impossible. But it would be the single greatest growth achievement in the history of public markets. Price it accordingly. Base Rates of Nominal and Real 5-Year Sales Growth for Firms With $2-5 Billion in Sales, 1950-2025
-
Great Friend of the Show Joel Wood (@GiftedMoney) reportedWCW had been losing millions of dollars for years before they closed shop. If AOL/Time Warner wanted WCW on their networks, they’d probably still be around today in some form. People comparing WCW to WWE never cease to make my head hurt. WCW folded because they were the number two and folded under the pressure of going after number 1. They would’ve had a better chance without the merger but they were still fighting the odds. It’s a lot easier for the number two to fold up shop than it ease for number 1 to fall to number 2. Especially when the gap is as wide as it is with WWE and AEW.
-
J. Sullivan (@JimSull59353417) reported@AntiLeftMemes 19 only because I never used AOL.