1. Home
  2. ❯
  3. Companies
  4. ❯
  5. AOL
  6. ❯
  7. Sidcup
AOL

AOL outages and service status in Sidcup, England

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map
  • AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Sidcup, including 0 direct reports.

AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.

Problems in the last 24 hours in Sidcup, England

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Sidcup, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Sidcup, England

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Sidcup and nearby locations:

  • urbankitchen
    The Urban Kitchen (@urbankitchen) reported from Camberwell, England

    @ShikhaJainMD Actually got 2 - never had MySpace or AOL account!

  • brokenbottleboy
    Mic Wright 🏳️‍🌈🏴‍☠️ (@brokenbottleboy) reported from Poplar, England

    When it first arrived — and I made a blog there within the first two months of its public existence — @tumblr was the near perfect blogging platform. Then AOL destroyed it. Now it’s a horrible jail where I can’t get rid of this dumb screen. Thanks @automatic.

  • broad_thomas
    Tom Broad (@broad_thomas) reported from Bexleyheath, England

    @AOLSupportHelp hi we have forgotten our aol@password tried to recover it but can’t, have no recovery details set up help please

  • jayfreund
    James Freund (@jayfreund) reported from Poplar, England

    @AOLSupportHelp hi there having trouble accessing my emails at the moment , I’ve tried to reset my password and it won’t allow me to , could you help?

  • stephca46203104
    steph carter (@stephca46203104) reported from Darenth, England

    @AOLSupportHelp I need help to access my email it’s saying the password or account isn’t correct but I can not access my recovery email address either. I’m being sent in a circle

  • xSarahSolomon
    Sarah Solomon (@xSarahSolomon) reported from Camberwell, England

    AGREED! Every kid except me had nice shiny internet...we were stuck with that shitty AOL dialup that we were only allowed to use to play Cartoon Network games on if we were good 🥴

  • JonRichard
    Jonathan Richard (@JonRichard) reported from Bromley, England

    @yungcontent And Bebo never sells to AOL

  • journeymanstev1
    Steve O (@journeymanstev1) reported from Camberwell, England

    @Suvvo @AOL I’m having same problem… think it’s worldwide

  • OrrinEdenfield
    Orrin Edenfield, an 🇺🇸 living in 🇬🇧 (@OrrinEdenfield) reported from Eltham, England

    @benjedwards school library had a dial-up modem (probably 9600 baud) to ISP through school district. At home was local ISP as AOL/Compuserve/etc. never had local numbers for me.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • jpvanhoy
    The Dread Bunny (@jpvanhoy) reported

    @lili_poobear @Phantom_King_99 @gizalovespizza Ok, look, you can probably find a half dozen slightly different definitions of the word "evolve" online (we both know you didn't use a dead-tree dictionary). But the fact remains, to not evolve is to stagnate. Even the definition you gave, if converted the boolean opposite, would say, "to NOT develop gradually, especially from a simple to a more complex form", and you could then argue that OP wants it to get more complex, but RAPIDLY rather than SLOWLY. The point is technology should always advance. Just because you're unhappy with some specific implementation of technology in the present, doesn't mean that "advance" will mean "things get worse". It's pretty childish to take that position, in fact. I mean, for ****'s sake, you're ON THE INTERNET right now, probably using either wireless broadband, or wired broadband access to post this message. Can you imagine sitting in at your computer desk, with the monitor riser and built-in CD-ROM storage slots, dialing into AOL in about 1996 and saying, "GAH! I don't want technology to evolve any more. I'm tired of sitting here waiting for JPGs of John Stamos to take 40 seconds to load. I'm tired of getting my directions from Mapquest!"

  • BackAlleyAL_
    Alley AL (@BackAlleyAL_) reported

    @SouthernGo40189 @markasual5 @BadQualityMemes No it means you never used a computer pre google as in AOL

  • DaniilBuilds
    Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported

    AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.

  • KDale53289
    KnightReads (@KDale53289) reported

    @Irina_exh 19. Never had an AOL address

  • Rebel43660949
    Rebel (@Rebel43660949) reported

    @Irina_exh 19/20 Never had an AOL account

  • mrmula973
    mr mula (@mrmula973) reported

    @Carpetpatch1 @OrevaZSN you act like AOL went extinct when 2000 came around. And honestly don’t give a **** about what it looked like back then. Everything yall had, we have now x10 and some more. Tf are you saying?

  • azuritess
    Azure (@azuritess) reported

    @svnryn_ runyu swept him to the top popularity at that time, and because his data topped ML/FL, as support actor. He was cursed badly, called the famous ten days of slaying the dragon incident, he was even banned and dropped by the AOL official/producer. +

  • ronjassme
    Ronald Jansson (@ronjassme) reported

    How much longer are we going to allow AOL to hold the "Power of the Purse?" Not to mention maintaining a say on American/ Foreign Relations, Ammendments to Federal Laws and the making of both Public and Administrative policys? It's just plain stupid. Bucket loads of Dumb **** .... That's what's it is. And she's dumping it all over US.....AH?

  • sailuh_dude
    Sailuh (@sailuh_dude) reported

    @Irina_exh Never had an AOL account but hit all the rest.

  • pcarterwriter
    patrick 🏳️‍🌈 supports labor and palestinians (@pcarterwriter) reported

    @Dontcare1369 @jolandiiQ reaching out might be wise :) agent impersonation is a problem, and more than one agency has a warning about it. four agents i know of use aol addresses. one of them is male. <3