1. Home
  2. ❯
  3. Companies
  4. ❯
  5. AOL
  6. ❯
  7. Kingswinford
AOL

AOL outages and service status in Kingswinford, England

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map
  • AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Kingswinford, including 0 direct reports.

AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.

Problems in the last 24 hours in Kingswinford, England

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Kingswinford, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Kingswinford, England

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Kingswinford and nearby locations:

  • champagnetrace
    tracey tutty (@champagnetrace) reported from Birmingham, England

    @aolmailhelp It seems that my aol email account is down again on iPhone and iPad. Is this happening elsewhere.

  • eleanorleonards
    Eleanor leonard (@eleanorleonards) reported from Willenhall, England

    @aolmailhelp please help ,its impossible to retrieve aol password as I need the password to email you. You neither provide any phone support! you provide twitter support but cannot help on here either. Set up account years ago so no longer have phone num or email for verification

  • samuelbhughes
    Samuel Hughes (@samuelbhughes) reported from Birmingham, England

    Serious judgement to anyone who has ntlworld email addresses. AOL just as bad.

  • BazForrest
    Baz Forrest (@BazForrest) reported from Bromsgrove, England

    @AOL need help with accessing my email account

  • lottynew
    Loreta (@lottynew) reported from Beoley, England

    @GeorgeTranos @AOL Ditto I have exactly the same@problem !!

  • Ayrwalker
    Ayr of the Four Winds (@Ayrwalker) reported from Birmingham, England

    @calligraphymmo @Volstatsz @WarcraftDevs @maelfus I’ve never understood the whole idea of “I don’t like it, so neither should you.” Sega Vs. Nintendo died out years ago with AOL chatrooms (HAHA JOKE ON MATURITY HERE) People neee to let it go and be happy that everyone can find their niche and BE HAPPY! Be a Joy Enabler.

  • mikewhitehurs12
    mike (@mikewhitehurs12) reported from Wolverhampton, England

    All those years ago when listening to the pings of AOL signing in I never expected the net to become such an ******* full of argumentative ********.

  • A_J_92
    Ash❗️ (@A_J_92) reported from Birmingham, England

    @ruthm4x @AOL Did you ever hear back from anyone about this further. It really is unbelievable what has happened. What about using @gmail there service is very user friendly not sure about warning though, I thought all providers would of done this, clearly not with @YahooCare

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • hvacguy
    Brett (@hvacguy) reported

    Remember growing up, pre internet. You only interacted with bad people by accident or bad decisions The internet added the bad people to your kids bedrooms, your phone, and your mind. I miss the AOL dialup format of the internet.

  • mnguyetinvests
    Minh Nguyệt🌙 (@mnguyetinvests) reported

    @_tinatruth Steve Bartlett explained financial bubbles in one minute. The AOL–Time Warner story is a powerful reminder that HIGH VALUATION IS NOT THE SAME AS REAL VALUE. It reminded me of something I wrote on August 17 on my post 👇 A GREAT ASSET doesn’t automatically make a GREAT INVESTMENT. Pay too much, and your returns can suffer. Allocate too much capital, and one mistake can damage your entire portfolio. That’s why I believe good investing isn’t just about choosing the right asset. It’s about paying the RIGHT PRICE and sizing your position wisely. The AOL–Time Warner story didn’t teach me that lesson. It reinforced it. If you haven’t read my August 17 post yet, I think it adds another perspective to this conversation. 👇

  • T00tbeer
    C (@T00tbeer) reported

    @WayneGunter8 @FrankenDjo Hahahaha oh ****. I forgot about AIM and AOL.

  • DaniilBuilds
    Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported

    AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.

  • Red_Devil1208
    Read Only Mode (@Red_Devil1208) reported

    @MapQuest Hahahaha this is like AOL screaming in 2026 they aren’t going to use AI or some ****. Like no one cares what you do because no one uses you anymore.

  • AsymEdge
    Asymmetric Edge Research (@AsymEdge) reported

    @2147mill The problem with the normie test is that the internet passed it in 1999 too. Totally non techy families were on AOL back then as well, over 20 million of them by the end of 1999. Amazon went from 17 million customers to 25 million between 1999 and 2001 and nearly doubled revenue, and the stock still lost 94% over those two years. So usage only tells you the thing is real. For the bubble question I look at what people pay for the earnings. Cisco was over 100x forward at the 2000 top, Nvidia is under 20x right now. Same thing with the crypto half of your post by the way. Nobody uses gold day to day either and that never made gold a bubble.

  • Jackez89
    Jackson Styles (@Jackez89) reported

    @theamelia___ 19, Australia never got AOL

  • needtobuild
    Just an old Marine (@needtobuild) reported

    @theikigaiguy @amazon Yep, same thing day after day. And history will repeat. A company thinks it’s infallible, but lose one customer here another there. And it adds up. Before long they become Sears, Kmart and AOL. IMO; They will end up splitting shopping and prime off eventually.

  • mblaydes1
    Mark Blaydes (@mblaydes1) reported

    @brockpierson I would login to AOL than go make dinner. By the time I came back the home page may have uploaded

  • rledbetterCPA
    Roger Ledbetter (@rledbetterCPA) reported

    You want 90s purchasing power but aren’t ready for the trade offs - - Tupac and Biggie releasing albums - Metallica and grunge peaking - Jordan in his prime - AOL instant messenger and no cell phones - Blockbuster video rentals Okay damn nevermind