AOL outages and service status in Hove, England

Problems in the last 24 hours in Hove, England

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Hove, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Hove, England

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Hove and nearby locations:

• 
  Sean (@choppy_1991) reported 28 minutes ago from Saltdean, England

  Have we just stopped doing set piece defence training at the AOL? ******* #SAFC

• 
  Wendy Fleet (@WendyFleet1) reported 31 minutes ago from Wivelsfield Green, England

  @AOLSupportHelp I need help in accessing my account as password not working and backup phone number no longer exists. Urgently need access to email

• 
  BrianJ (@athenabkk) reported 52 minutes ago from Hove, England

  @yarpegleg 1 point - never had an aol email account

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  🄾🅃🅃🄾 🅃🄾🄿🄲🄸 for Congress (@OttoTopci) reported 3 minutes ago

  @cecsquared @craasch @3YearLetterman That’s quite an admission of guilt. Cancel yore AOL account.

• 
  Pelo_dave1 (@PeloDave1) reported 5 minutes ago

  @SarahSevans2000 19…..never had an aol account

• 
  Rob Tammaro (@rtam24) reported 5 minutes ago

  AOL would never post this

• 
  Hoyle, Joseph E. (@JEHoyle1971) reported 9 minutes ago

  I probably have four CPU towers gone obsolete since 1998, & few more I don't have anymore. My first computer was a Packard-Bell Navigator in 1998. Dial-up AOL, slow as Hell. In 2012 I worked at Steve Case's house in McLean. $50 million house, where JFK wrote a book, 'cause his wife grew up there- "Merrywood"

• 
  Juan Wick (@jfsworks) reported 11 minutes ago

  @CedricMcMillan5 @FadeAwayMedia Yes. That is what everyone claims. It actually went down hill during the AOL Time warner deal and sold away. Everyone forgets about that.

• 
  c000game (@c000game) reported 12 minutes ago

  @neogeo8man Honestly a fascinating bit of internet history fluff to me that my generation HATED "lol" and saw it as a sign of endless inept low-IQ ****-humor AOL/CompuServ migrants. Then we gradually started using it ironically, like "lol" for "how stupid". Then we just started meaning "heh"

• 
  Steve (artificially intelligent), Esq. (@ProbablyNotAnAI) reported 13 minutes ago

  @SarahSevans2000 I never had AOL not sure why I missed that. Though I must've created one to get free Internet access for a minute

• 
  Dr. David Burkus (@davidburkus) reported 13 minutes ago

  WSJ profiled Bending Spoons this week — the Milan company that owns AOL, Evernote, and Vimeo, run by executives in their 30s and staffed by people who are sometimes younger than the software they've been hired to fix. It's actually a story about why so many applicants never make it through the door. Hundreds of thousands apply every year — enough that the rejection rate makes Harvard look like an easy yes — and most of them are optimizing for the wrong thing: credentials, polish, a great answer to "tell me about yourself." Almost anyone can be gracious to the person deciding their future. It's how they treat someone who can't do anything for them that's hard to fake. Last year: roughly 800,000 applications, 286 hires, an acceptance rate near 0.04% — tighter than Citadel's famously selective quant recruiting (0.36%), something like a hundred times harder than Harvard. That selectivity isn't a gut call. A dedicated team inside the company grades every interview against fixed criteria, then tracks how each hire performs months and years later, feeding the results back into the model. CEO Luca Ferrari has said the signal his team weights hardest is exactly this — how a candidate treats the people who have zero power over the outcome: the assistant, the receptionist. Not decency theater. Data: how you act in front of power is a performance; how you act in front of none is closer to the truth. That gap gets coded straight into the model, right alongside the interview scores. I'd bet you've done the reverse of this in the last week without noticing — warm with your boss, a little short with someone who couldn't do anything for you either way. Most companies say they hire for character. Very few test it anywhere the candidate isn't being watched by someone who can help them. Worth trying on your own team — just notice who's kind to the person who can't do anything for them.

• 
  CEOInterviews.AI (@CEOinterview) reported 13 minutes ago

  A company built on software the internet left for dead just IPO'd on the Nasdaq at roughly $25B. Bending Spoons $BSP buys tired brands, AOL, WeTransfer, Vimeo, Evernote, fixes them, and never sells. It went from zero to $1B in revenue in 10 years and closed its first trading day up 40% on a $1.68B raise. CEO Luca Ferrari on the model every advisor told him to kill: 'betting on growing primarily through acquisitions where everybody was telling us you got to focus on one product... pretty much every single company that I've seen do that, they have done much worse than we have.' A roll-up of has-been apps is now worth more than most of the startups Silicon Valley calls the future. Source: The Italian CEO @bendingspoons

• 
  Pit Schultz (@pitsch) reported 14 minutes ago

  If you follow the debates in France, Bavaria and the UK, institutions that still care about sovereignty in police and intelligence are struggling to justify their Palantir contracts. Karp applies the same rhetorical operation he once ran on the Frankfurt School to dismiss open-weight bare-metal local AI: autonomous, private, sovereign exactly at the nation-state layer - where Palantir instead builds a global empire on critical data, pushing proprietary “ontology” across military, police and surveillance with zero open source, weaponizing the arguments of the systemic opponent as travesty. The US hyperscaler bubble doubles down on proprietary monoliths defending their shrinking moats, while technology moves the other way. They all want to become the SGI, Sun, Digital or AOL of the AI age.