AOL outages and service status in Cleckheaton, England

Problems in the last 24 hours in Cleckheaton, England

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Cleckheaton, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Cleckheaton, England

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Cleckheaton and nearby locations:

• 
  Jason Weir (@jaseweir) reported 4 minutes ago from Bradford, England

  @AOLSupportHelp this number is unobtainable in the UK I have DM aol support

• 
  Sam Clark (@clarkswfc) reported 5 minutes ago from Leeds, England

  @AOLSupportHelp @aolmail is there a problem with downloading attachments in emails? Can’t seem to open any. Any advice? Get an error code EC 4008?

• 
  Jason Weir (@jaseweir) reported 12 minutes ago from Bradford, England

  @AOLSupportHelp I have been told to reach out to UK customer service How can I reach out if I CANNOT CONTACT YOU VIA EMAIL OR TELEPHONE

• 
  Andrew Stubbs (@andyjstubbs24) reported 29 minutes ago from Wakefield, England

  @AOLSupportHelp hello I hope you can help me for some reason I’m not able to receive emails for the last 48 hours, also because ive had my account with aol for so long I can’t remember the password to log back in ive tryed to log out and log back in again

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  blue diamond (@Diamondairre) reported 6 minutes ago

  @AOL stop being an ******* go back to you bartending

• 
  Dr. David Burkus (@davidburkus) reported 11 minutes ago

  WSJ profiled Bending Spoons this week — the Milan company that owns AOL, Evernote, and Vimeo, run by executives in their 30s and staffed by people who are sometimes younger than the software they've been hired to fix. It's actually a story about why so many applicants never make it through the door. Hundreds of thousands apply every year — enough that the rejection rate makes Harvard look like an easy yes — and most of them are optimizing for the wrong thing: credentials, polish, a great answer to "tell me about yourself." Almost anyone can be gracious to the person deciding their future. It's how they treat someone who can't do anything for them that's hard to fake. Last year: roughly 800,000 applications, 286 hires, an acceptance rate near 0.04% — tighter than Citadel's famously selective quant recruiting (0.36%), something like a hundred times harder than Harvard. That selectivity isn't a gut call. A dedicated team inside the company grades every interview against fixed criteria, then tracks how each hire performs months and years later, feeding the results back into the model. CEO Luca Ferrari has said the signal his team weights hardest is exactly this — how a candidate treats the people who have zero power over the outcome: the assistant, the receptionist. Not decency theater. Data: how you act in front of power is a performance; how you act in front of none is closer to the truth. That gap gets coded straight into the model, right alongside the interview scores. I'd bet you've done the reverse of this in the last week without noticing — warm with your boss, a little short with someone who couldn't do anything for you either way. Most companies say they hire for character. Very few test it anywhere the candidate isn't being watched by someone who can help them. Worth trying on your own team — just notice who's kind to the person who can't do anything for them.

• 
  Liquid Barb 🌻🟧💙🌈🦋 (@LiquidBarb) reported 12 minutes ago

  @SarahSevans2000 Never had AOL or a Walkman, but all the rest & more!

• 
  Chrissy (@mschrissynicole) reported 14 minutes ago

  Just saw an ad from yahoo….i didn’t even know we still had yahoo…good for them damn. I remember when I had a yahoo email address. Everyone else had aol and hotmail but my dad wouldn’t let me bc he thought I was too young (aka he was stricked) so I snuck and got a yahoo email.

• 
  Nardz Blanco (@NBlanco25583) reported 15 minutes ago

  If anyone is claiming to be my woman in another place, they are just lying because.. No... I never do long distance relationships.. That's been a rule for me since AOL messenger...

• 
  Michael Morrell (@michaelmorrell) reported 16 minutes ago

  @immaterial_ink @solanamobile fully onchain chat protocol like aol instant messenger. pgp for dms. powered by memo program or something. biggest blocker is adoption friction i.e. getting it in an existing wallet app, and/or getting pkeys imported, and establishing a network effect

• 
  john v. variety ❤️.U.∞ OUT NOW (@johnvvariety) reported 23 minutes ago

  I like that you can ask AI for video game cheat codes and if a guy ever gets ***** or not. It makes me feel like a child on AOL again. Looking up gamefaqs while saying SlipknotFan42 has never kissed a girl French style

• 
  Seoul Man (@Monkey3ddd) reported 28 minutes ago

  @TheMorningSpew2 Maybe help her change her AOL password.

• 
  Gregory Blotnick (@gregoryblotnick) reported 30 minutes ago

  key w/ reading older material like this (in QT), is a deep understanding of business models someone new would look at this and say, “why do I care about AOL” I prob would've said the same at a younger age but there's two errors, one is viewing everything ex post vs ex ante (conflating process vs outcome), the second is underestimating how sharp markets are everything is a DCF, and every business model can be mapped to an income statement + fcfs so in that light, nothing is ever really new, nor is nothing ever really old esp during dot com era, if you go back today and read a lot of initiations/bull case takes, they’re far from outrageous, and many went on to prove correct albeit on the wrong time horizon (ie took 10+ years instead of 3-5) AOL's revenue went from $425M in 1995, to nearly $5B in 1999 and ~$1B in earnings/CFO when a company is growing revs that fast, u can make a DCF work for the piece below, I don’t know tech, so I can’t do this exercise for something like AOL - but in other sectors, u can usually bank on the same principles, just with a tighter range of outcomes…why it never hurts to keep running case studies + keep feeding the pattern recognition machine.

• 
  Chris Farrell (@chrispfarrell) reported 36 minutes ago

  I think OpenAI and Anthropic might be the CompuServe and AOL of the AI era. Does anyone actually think Microsoft, Google, Amazon, Apple, Meta, Oracle, IBM, X/Twitter, and all of the other big tech companies will just allow these 2 badly run startups to capture the AI market? OpenAI and Anthropic don't have a moat or sustainable competitive advantage. To win they have to not only develop a moat but penetrate some of the most fortified moats. Model quality isn't a moat. Kimi, Grok, Deepseek proved that. Inference will become a commodity utility that requires massive CapEx that neither can finance. Interface is where the moat is the weakest. OpenAI and Anthropic do not own the apps or the OS. The OS and apps are owned by parties who view OpenAI or Anthropic as threats, and they can complicate things very easily. As if that is not grim enough, AI sovereignty will become an issue. Consumers will want their iCloud data to stay in iCloud, their OneDrive data to stay in OneDrive, etc. Enterprise customers will want AI from their cloud providers to reduce egress and for performance + IP reasons. It is honestly hard to imagine a world where OpenAI and Anthropic survive as they are. They will either morph into companies with entirely different value offerings or die like Compuserve and AOL.