AOL outages and service status in Burntisland, Scotland

Problems in the last 24 hours in Burntisland, Scotland

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Burntisland, Scotland and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Burntisland, Scotland

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Burntisland and nearby locations:

• 
  Gavin Barrie 🏳️‍🌈🐕🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿👬🎮 🦖 (@jammach) reported 19 minutes ago from Livingston, Scotland

  @kjm1468 @Amalkadog @desertrose1969 I never had an aol email account. I started with Demon.

• 
  Prof Clare (@CGuilding) reported 40 minutes ago from Edinburgh, Scotland

  @Lis_Lowe I've never had an AOL email address...

• 
  Brenda (@douganbren) reported 41 minutes ago from Limekilns, Scotland

  @AOLSupportHelp I’ve now changed email provider as after over 30 years with aol I feel completely let down …. You have been absolutely no help at all 😡

• 
  Kee The Drummer From Fife (@DrummerFromFife) reported 49 minutes ago from Edinburgh, Scotland

  @ThatEricAlper Don't touch the phone while I'm on AOL, otherwise you'll **** up the modem!

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  AcePorkins (@AcePorkins) reported 5 minutes ago

  @SarahSevans2000 19, somehow never had an AOL address. I think I skipped straight to yahoo or Hotmail.

• 
  NipNapShite (@NipNapShite) reported 5 minutes ago

  @keithapearson Still very much on aol Might have been their first customer 🤪

• 
  Jake🍁🇨🇦🏳️‍🌈 🇵🇸🇺🇦 (@RabidCoo) reported 8 minutes ago

  @lilhousgreendor I never had an AOL email address. Which doesn't help making me not feel old

• 
  Mike Cecconi (@Cecconi140) reported 13 minutes ago

  The saddest thing is when the cheap ugly insulting lazy AI slop ad tells you "support local" or "thank you for supporting local" when they refused to hire a local graphic designer to use an AOL chatbot that just polluted their own water. Madness.

• 
  Pelo_dave1 (@PeloDave1) reported 13 minutes ago

  @SarahSevans2000 19…..never had an aol account

• 
  Levity (@LevityODonnell) reported 18 minutes ago

  None of them have ever rung me. I got to the MSN point, adding people. I never got to the AOL AIM level they were all on. No one would share the lists with me.

• 
  madz (@yaoiontheside) reported 23 minutes ago

  @thefieldscene facts. i’m calling it, he’s getting that laptop to ******** to Will’s AOL messages and photos Will sends him (probably an extreme but the man is beyond help what can i do 🫩)

• 
  Apollo Wiki 🇬🇧 (@ApolloWiki) reported 26 minutes ago

  @peterjbirks @GetItQuietly Twenty years ago there was a guy named Ferrari who had to say ‘cancel the account’ 21 times before AOL would cancel it. At one stage, AOL asked him to put his father on the line. He was 30

• 
  Sheila Howze-Jones (@ChynaStormWx) reported 28 minutes ago

  @Soaringeagle45 I got 15 points due to the fact that I never used a fax machine, got a AOL account, dial up internet, nor used a checkbook until college my grandfather was the only person sleeps on a waterbed

• 
  Dr. David Burkus (@davidburkus) reported 28 minutes ago

  WSJ profiled Bending Spoons this week — the Milan company that owns AOL, Evernote, and Vimeo, run by executives in their 30s and staffed by people who are sometimes younger than the software they've been hired to fix. It's actually a story about why so many applicants never make it through the door. Hundreds of thousands apply every year — enough that the rejection rate makes Harvard look like an easy yes — and most of them are optimizing for the wrong thing: credentials, polish, a great answer to "tell me about yourself." Almost anyone can be gracious to the person deciding their future. It's how they treat someone who can't do anything for them that's hard to fake. Last year: roughly 800,000 applications, 286 hires, an acceptance rate near 0.04% — tighter than Citadel's famously selective quant recruiting (0.36%), something like a hundred times harder than Harvard. That selectivity isn't a gut call. A dedicated team inside the company grades every interview against fixed criteria, then tracks how each hire performs months and years later, feeding the results back into the model. CEO Luca Ferrari has said the signal his team weights hardest is exactly this — how a candidate treats the people who have zero power over the outcome: the assistant, the receptionist. Not decency theater. Data: how you act in front of power is a performance; how you act in front of none is closer to the truth. That gap gets coded straight into the model, right alongside the interview scores. I'd bet you've done the reverse of this in the last week without noticing — warm with your boss, a little short with someone who couldn't do anything for you either way. Most companies say they hire for character. Very few test it anywhere the candidate isn't being watched by someone who can help them. Worth trying on your own team — just notice who's kind to the person who can't do anything for them.