AOL outages and service status in Burgess Hill, England
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
Full Outage Map
- AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Burgess Hill, including 0 direct reports.
AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.
Problems in the last 24 hours in Burgess Hill, England
The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Burgess Hill, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
AOL Issues Reports Near Burgess Hill, England
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Burgess Hill and nearby locations:
-
-
Wendy Fleet (@WendyFleet1) reported from Wivelsfield Green, England@AOLSupportHelp I need help in accessing my account as password not working and backup phone number no longer exists. Urgently need access to email
-
Lisa Bailey (@lisa01403) reported from Horsham, England@TalkTalk I'm not sure on that one as was with AOL and then you bought them out so never really got welcome pack from TalkTalk.
-
Sean (@choppy_1991) reported from Saltdean, EnglandHave we just stopped doing set piece defence training at the AOL? ******* #SAFC
AOL Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
StuyBoy From NYC (@StuyBoyNY) reported@visegrad24 Probably comes with AOL dialup service, and no toilet, only a bucket.
-
𝔸𝕔𝕖♠️🇳🇬☠️ 3 KINGS WILL RISE🇧🇫🇳🇪🇲🇱👑👑👑 (@JohnnyACE562) reported@Ghfg32290189 Why not? Every merger they get into goes bad for a reason. AOL? AT&T? Discovery? Now this.
-
Ya Filthy Animal (@PatSoxCeltBruin) reported@TrollFootball While this is true, I can’t really talk ****, when I was 19 I was stocking can’s on a shelf and spent my nights on AOL messenger.
-
Heath Weaver (@heathweaver) reported@qlypai For @twigl_it I don't think of it as a wrapper around a frontier model, but I guess you could say that. In my view, all frontier models will follow the path of AOL. It's moving rapidly along the same trajectory. AOL mail, chat were all massively popular; AOL's valuation went to the moon, etc. But then dedicated tools came in, and against the single focus, AOL couldn't compete. Once SpaceX launches space-based datacenters along with Starlink, the game will be up. My bet is that the harness is where the value is at. I have really zero loyalty to a particular model; I just want the highest raw intelligence with the ability to throttle down for work that doesn't need it. It's not even clear to me what Anthropic or OpenAI think is actually going to happen. I am sure they can see from their own metrics that like 95% of users are just using it as a glorified search engine. The mass does not care at all about the companies and will use whatever is best and free (i.e., ad-supported). In the long run, Google will likely win. So a true wrapper, like simply putting the API with a bit of context, will become irrelevant to higher levels of intelligence, but I don't think the frontier models can ever win against a superior harness on a really specific proprietary data pool. I am betting that people would rather have more control over their own data, be able to better direct context, and be able to use the best-performing self-healing skills with tools with the most intelligent model that is out there.
-
Greg Manuel (He/Him: GIFT SHOP IN BIO!) (@WriterComicNYer) reported@KydJustice If AOL/Time Warner wanted to keep wrestling on their network, nothing happening in WCW at the time would have mattered. Brooks is full of ****.
-
ySo (@SupremerZ) reported@JohnHolbein1 AOL mail must be the damn boomers destroying the country
-
nt | trilogy truther (@nontoxicwrites) reported@loadmeup you’re smarter than me ive been online since aol chat rooms and i will never, ever learn lmao
-
Sarah-Jane (SJ) Murray (@SJ_Murray) reported@johnhboyer Lol. Think about this: it was started in 1987. Planning began in 1985, before the modern standard web browser existed. I remember thinking, when I learned shout it at Ga Tech, that it was wild that someone envisioned putting a library contacts online only 2 years after TCP/ IP protocol became standard. And before the www as we know it came into being (around 1989). Quantum Computing Service, founded the same year in 1985, didn’t even become AOL until 1991. Talk about vision!
-
Pelo_dave1 (@PeloDave1) reported@SarahSevans2000 19…..never had an aol account
-
Jeff Bohren (@JeffBohren) reportedSince I have been casting aspersions on "Agile as Practiced in Nearly Every Project with a Certified Scrum Master", I should tell you about some projects I was on that worked. One on the most interesting ones was during my Network Management product development phase. I was hired by ARINC to work on software for the Iridium project. Shortly thereafter, one of the directors came up with an idea for a commercial product. He wanted a no code drag and drop UI to create a GUI to show and control SNMP values. We went to two Networld-Interop shows a year, one in Las Vegas and one in Atlanta. He wanted a new minor release for each trade show. The product owner would give the dev team a list of prioritized features. The five developers would meet and decide what we could do by the next release and worked in order of priority. That's it. Simple and effective. The code was written in C/C++ and was written to run on Windows, SunOS, HP-UX, and AIX. We used a OSS GUI library called InterViews. It integrated with HP OpenView and IBM NetView. From a business perspective, the project was a failure. We made sales, but not enough. Eventually the project was terminated an we were all laid off. That is when I was hire by AOL, but that is another story.