AOL outages and service status in Alexandria, Kentucky

Problems in the last 24 hours in Alexandria, Kentucky

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Alexandria, Kentucky and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Alexandria, Kentucky

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Alexandria and nearby locations:

• 
  Thom Gore (@thomgore) reported 9 minutes ago from Independence, Kentucky

  @ShannonD10 @angelgirl1976 Sorry. I actually have six. I have one which isn’t on my phone and I never log into. I give it when an email address and I don’t want their emails. AOL probably hates me.

• 
  Mike (@Mstaats13) reported 48 minutes ago from Fort Wright, Kentucky

  @AllanNate @calebfurst @HoodieCarsen Damn that’s actually pretty funny, I totally forgot about that site. I remember reading it back in the AOL days lol

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Yoyohiku🕹️The Arcade Dweller👾 (@YoYoHiku) reported 3 minutes ago

  @halenhargreevs I used to hate login into AOL or aim 😭

• 
  real missing talon hours (@iheartlog) reported 5 minutes ago

  once the aol screenshots of them being an emetophile hit the fandom all bets were off. now it's talking about puking every night, the other band members spitting **** up constantly, etc...you love to see it.

• 
  Kalyani 🔱 (@K_Oswal) reported 7 minutes ago

  Oye @sardesairajdeep why so quiet. Werent you jumping n dancing when Vimlendu n that other man Mishra now dead made false allegations on AOL? Yr wife after her horrible fake the nation video went begging for forgiveness to Gurudev. When are you apologizing? Saanp suungh gaya?

• 
  Dave (@Davef23) reported 9 minutes ago

  @Irina_exh 19 never had AOL

• 
  DOT_Singularity🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 (@DOT_singularity) reported 11 minutes ago

  @SteveMoraco Boo- friggidty-hooo, This is nothing new. I want the AI to be able to pull in context from **** I wrote on AOL in 1995. My online **** game was strong! If you're Laboring under some expectation of ever having true privacy in the digital world , it's a fools errand. Crack on.

• 
  Ronald Jansson (@ronjassme) reported 14 minutes ago

  How much longer are we going to allow AOL to hold the "Power of the Purse?" Not to mention maintaining a say on American/ Foreign Relations, Ammendments to Federal Laws and the making of both Public and Administrative policys? It's just plain stupid. Bucket loads of Dumb **** .... That's what's it is. And she's dumping it all over US.....AH?

• 
  Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported 15 minutes ago

  AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.

• 
  1stRoundBust (@FirstRdBust) reported 15 minutes ago

  @Irina_exh 18 for sure, Aunt had a waterbed. I tried it, it was terrible, and I never used an AOL address. I was a yahoo guy. Still have it. I did, however, use those cds that gave you internet time.

• 
  Thomas Olenik (@TomOlenik) reported 15 minutes ago

  @signorina37H 56k was blazing fast. I was an AOL customer beefier they went public with a 14.4k modem in a 486-66 machine and a whopping 8 MB RAM.

• 
  ✨Elleecat✨🇨🇦🇺🇦 (@goodwitch829) reported 24 minutes ago

  @Irina_exh @bshepherd05 18. I’ve never used a phone booth, and I didn’t have an aol address. I’m really not that old, just grew up in the 1980s and 90s