1. Home
  2. Companies
  3. AOL
  4. Florence
AOL

AOL outages and service status in Florence, Kentucky

No problems detected

If you are having issues, please submit a report below.

Full Outage Map
  • AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Florence, including 0 direct reports.

AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.

Problems in the last 24 hours in Florence, Kentucky

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Florence, Kentucky and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Florence, Kentucky

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Florence and nearby locations:

  • thomgore
    Thom Gore (@thomgore) reported from Independence, Kentucky

    @ShannonD10 @angelgirl1976 Sorry. I actually have six. I have one which isn’t on my phone and I never log into. I give it when an email address and I don’t want their emails. AOL probably hates me.

  • tom_streeter
    Tom Streeter (@tom_streeter) reported from Burlington, Kentucky

    @CincinnatiPhil If it was in the alt.* hierarchy it was a real crapshoot, but this was before “Eternal September’ (when AOL went on the Internet) so it exceeded FBook on its worst day. Tim Berniers-Lee & Marc Anderson both made their initial announcements on Usenet.

  • ScottEvansOnAir
    Scott Evans (@ScottEvansOnAir) reported from Elsmere, Kentucky

    @LambertJan42 @EBischoff They beat Raw for more than 100 weeks total. WCW didn’t go bankrupt. It was sold effectively for that amount to WWE because AOL-TW decided to end TV for wrestling killing its value. There was some bad TV in 99-01 but no matter what AOL was ending it.

  • ScottEvansOnAir
    Scott Evans (@ScottEvansOnAir) reported from Elsmere, Kentucky

    @StevieFromAbove @EBischoff That had zero to do with the programming decision by Kellner. He didn’t care about the number of eyeballs. He wanted different eyeballs based on his perception. Also had the Fusient deal went through AOL-TW would have cut out a huge expense while keeping programming on.

  • Mstaats13
    Mike (@Mstaats13) reported from Fort Wright, Kentucky

    @AllanNate @calebfurst @HoodieCarsen Damn that’s actually pretty funny, I totally forgot about that site. I remember reading it back in the AOL days lol

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

  • invalidkicks
    lnvalid.eth (@invalidkicks) reported

    @MapQuest Is this like AOL? wtf is a Mapquest

  • pixisass
    Pixisass (@pixisass) reported

    @DrDaymarcus I did not know that AOL had dial up service until 2025. Sources?

  • RakeshSFNYC
    Rakesh Agrawal (@RakeshSFNYC) reported

    @ckneumann The dev team I worked with on one of my projects at Aol was from Mapquest. Absolute worst team I've ever worked with. But in this case, the fault was leadership.

  • _tinatruth
    ⚔️Tina Truth⚔️ (@_tinatruth) reported

    But AOL knew a threat was approaching. Broadband internet was gaining momentum. The problem? AOL’s business model was built for the old internet. The slow, dial-up world. To compete with broadband, AOL thought it needed something it didn’t yet have: World-class content. A merger with Time Warner would give AOL access to some of the most valuable media properties in the world. Together, they believed they could dominate the future of the internet.

  • ashkenahzee
    Khazar Theory Enthusiast (@ashkenahzee) reported

    @KayakZztee5 @tombelaviv_ At least he has a gallbladder and a mother. One who didn't die ashamed. One who didn't have repressed anger towards her son for being a useful idiot of the feds just like Jason Kessler and mentally ill disabled former employee of Oddcast and AOL. Sven is his new mommy. Evil mommy

  • Blessed_EV1221
    Blessed E v (@Blessed_EV1221) reported

    @AwakenedOutlaw AOl is right on right on! Or she's just down right lying because she knows lefties love fraud - so Cloward-Piven, blame your enemy for what you are doing. Projection!

  • Phila_Mino
    Minnow (@Phila_Mino) reported

    No Nick, I'm done talking about dad. I'm exhausted, let him cancel his own AOL subscription and change the TV input by himself, I'm out.

  • OlivierGroot
    Olivier Groot (@OlivierGroot) reported

    @theamelia___ 18 but only as there was no AOL in NL and a waterbed is something I never understood

  • DaniilBuilds
    Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported

    AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.

  • pcarterwriter
    patrick 🏳️‍🌈 supports labor and palestinians (@pcarterwriter) reported

    @Dontcare1369 @jolandiiQ reaching out might be wise :) agent impersonation is a problem, and more than one agency has a warning about it. four agents i know of use aol addresses. one of them is male. <3