AOL outages and service status in Clinton Township, Michigan

Problems in the last 24 hours in Clinton Township, Michigan

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Clinton Township, Michigan and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Clinton Township, Michigan

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Clinton Township and nearby locations:

• 
  Tyler Dzikowski (@TylerDzikowski) reported 6 minutes ago from Mount Clemens, Michigan

  @AOL a tip for the future, please, slow down. It would help me. 🙏

• 
  Jerry (@JerryoakesJerry) reported 18 minutes ago from Clinton Township, Michigan

  @Smoke56895160 @AOL Cancel the election until there is no more pandemic virus. That should fix it

• 
  katie (@the_ktbug) reported 44 minutes ago from Warren, Michigan

  @zoolegs 1. Told someone I was from Michigan and that the weather here was nice. 2. Called someone an *******. Both times I tried to lie and tell my grandma I didn't do it and both times AOL ratted me out with the receipts.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Aüd! 🎡 #SWAG (@lyfeisgood111) reported 6 minutes ago

  I guess I’m just some guy that poke around because I don’t know Yeahhhh ion know **** but I knew exactly who to ask for and look for… Just like Ben laden How ah ***** knowing but he didn’t know nun… CIA thankfully I gee up on AOL ppl duck and hide and still get found!

• 
  𝗝𝗼𝗲 𝗥𝗼𝘀𝗮𝘁𝗼 (@joerosato) reported 7 minutes ago

  @Dan_Jeffries1 Gates never said this. In the 1990s, Microsoft focused on proprietary online networks (MSN) rather than the 'internet'. Think AOL. The 'internet' was a side product you got by connecting to their proprietary service. Downplaying to be the source of connection = marketing 😐

• 
  Amanda Rankin (@tigerbitewand) reported 8 minutes ago

  Catfish people I mean like for real they're scamming stupid people I'm not a stupid person on XP I could actually go into the register keys and pull out Trojan horses like AOL... It was not allowed on my computer it was not one of my emails Yahoo was... Anybody else recognize how

• 
  Robert (@RobertKidd0x) reported 9 minutes ago

  I'm old enough to remember the days when people said the internet would never catch on and just be a fad. Look how far we've come from dial-up and AOL. We're at a similar beginning now with AI. When change is unavoidable, you have to embrace it, if you are to survive.

• 
  Bubblegum (@VeriPatriot45) reported 15 minutes ago

  @MapQuest Talk about a blast from the past. Didn’t know you guys still existed. You must be busy hanging out with AOL and floppy discs in the land of outdated crap.

• 
  UltraMan (@RZVLAZ) reported 17 minutes ago

  @washingtonpost AOL dialup internet is number one internet service provider again. What a time to be alive!

• 
  Jesse (@jesse_altman) reported 17 minutes ago

  If you ever find yourself scrolling X and feeling like there’s too much happening and you’re falling behind on __________ thing, zoom out and realize by even being here and a part of the conversation you’re already light years ahead of 99% of the population w/ respect to the AI renaissance we’re currently living through. We’re still so early. It’s like the days when AOL used to mail you a CD ROM to onboard you onto dial up internet - we’re there. Spending the weekend with old friends in Austin, none of whom are in tech/SaaS or marketing. They’re doctors, actors/producers, teachers, civil engineers, carpenters, etc…and most of what we talk about on this app is totally alien to them. Which is totally fine. I’m hanging with the $20/mo Claude plan crowd. Their X feed is completely different. While I get a crazy amount of knowledge from this site it comes with decent bit of anxiety as well. There’s a shitload of noise to find the actual signal. That’s the apparent trade off — a sense of impending doom and feeling like if I don’t immediately test this platform/load this skill/build this workflow/try this model, etc…in exchange for what a never ending stream of knowledge from some genuinely brilliant people.

• 
  A.J. Perez (@byajperez) reported 18 minutes ago

  @ChelseaV @DegenerateTBone Is your AOL that slow you didn’t see my next tweet?

• 
  My Full Name is uh.. (@t14159) reported 30 minutes ago

  @brockpierson That modem is too new. It doesn't have any microphones. Go back to the source with an acoustic coupler modem. Of course, you're going to have a little trouble getting a working telephone handset and analog phone line. At least the AoL CDs will be easy to find.

• 
  Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported 32 minutes ago

  AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.