AOL outages and service status in Clinton Township, Michigan
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
- AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Clinton Township, including 0 direct reports.
AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.
Problems in the last 24 hours in Clinton Township, Michigan
The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Clinton Township, Michigan and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
AOL Issues Reports Near Clinton Township, Michigan
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Clinton Township and nearby locations:
-
Jerry (@JerryoakesJerry) reported from Clinton Township, Michigan@Smoke56895160 @AOL Cancel the election until there is no more pandemic virus. That should fix it
-
Tyler Dzikowski (@TylerDzikowski) reported from Mount Clemens, Michigan@AOL a tip for the future, please, slow down. It would help me. 🙏
-
katie (@the_ktbug) reported from Warren, Michigan@zoolegs 1. Told someone I was from Michigan and that the weather here was nice. 2. Called someone an *******. Both times I tried to lie and tell my grandma I didn't do it and both times AOL ratted me out with the receipts.
AOL Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Jaye (@ParanoiaNM) reportedi know your "sponsored" spend "millions" on your site, and this **** loads like AOL in 2006, @Trainwreckstv @StakeEddie @Stake u should be ashamed this is ******* dog **** lil broders
-
lusid (@lusidghost) reported@dirtyhippie77 Before I reply to your comment, let me take a walk down memory lane and recount the first comment I ever replied to on the internet. I believe it was in a chat room on AOL. I had just logged onto a free trial from a disc that had come in the mail. I first had to make up a username and password. My head spun. Who WAS I? I hadn't asked myself this question until this very moment. Who, WAS, I? AND, what was my password? My head spun once again, but with more centrifugal force and bewilderment. Anyway, yeah no doubt.
-
Safestexchange (@safestexchange) reported@theswansjr HTTP protocol isn't "open network", its actually a very controlled network Compare bitcoin to AOL, not to the internet
-
Fleetwoodzac76 (@Fleetwoodzac76) reported@nkhlday @MaxNordau @esaagar Saagar and the guy before him are not just talking about AI. They're saying the entire internet, going back to yahoo groups, Aol instant messenger and geocities is bad. Which is completely insane.
-
Silencerr (@SilencerGG) reported@slime_machine If spaces are your issue, I don't have anything to worry about. I'm not winning a writing prize to speak to people casually. If my spaces are a problem for you I do not care. BUT since I am a " millennial " I will tell you why, I was taught how to type on OLD ****. Technically computers just started getting popular, AOL and **** was out at the time. And in my Typing class, i was taught to use 2 spaces which before Gen Z was born, 2 spaces is what typewriters used for spacing and formatting clarifying the beginning of a new sentence. MODERN times only call for 1 space. So if you truly are wondering why I use two spaces its because i was taught by Boomers to type. One space is what Gen Z is used to. 2 Spaces is what i was taught by people who used typewriters. Even using one space to me looks like a run on sentence because one space separates every word in a sentence, and for me to start a new sentence means i should space it out more for ' formatting ' purposes I hope that helps everyone who took their time to only care about how i typed what i wrote instead of WHAT i actually wrote.
-
John Rusnak (@JohnRusnak) reported@Irina_exh 19, never had an aol address
-
DJ Richards (@stumblebum54) reported@unseen1_unseen This is what’s was like trying to cancel an AOL account back in the day. But this account says it’s based in Africa so probably not especially credible.
-
FreedoMan (@advisors_abcz) reportedNever bet against Elon. If OpenAI doesn't pay attention, it will be the next AOL.
-
Katy A. (@KatyLMA) reported@Ken_FiveSolas I got 19. I never had an aol address. LOL
-
Scottx70 (@scottx70) reported@CJGRISHAM Courtesy of Larry Johnson STFU Here is the heart of the problem. The Combat Logistics Force today numbers about 34 ships — a figure that has stayed essentially flat for well over a decade. On paper, stability. In practice, a slow hollowing, because the demands on that force have grown while its most capable ships have disappeared. Around 2010, the Navy operated all four of its Supply-class fast combat support ships. Today only two remain. In the mid-2010s the Navy inactivated two of them into reserve to save roughly $30 million a year each in operating costs — a decision that looked reasonable on a spreadsheet and looks indefensible from the deck of a hungry ship. The reason it bites is arithmetic: replacing the combined capability of one fast support ship typically takes an oiler plus a dry cargo ship — two hulls, two crews, two schedules — to move the fuel, ammo, and food that one ship used to carry in a single package. Cut the fast support fleet in half and every sustained single-carrier mission becomes harder to feed. The rest of the force is aging underneath the flat headline. The Henry J. Kaiser-class oilers that form the backbone date to the 1980s and are being retired faster than their replacements arrive. The new John Lewis-class oiler program is meant to recapitalize the fleet with some twenty ships, but the lead ship only delivered in 2022 and just one was fully operational by mid-2025. The Navy’s own newer answer — a smaller, more numerous “light replenishment oiler,” the T-AOL — does not begin construction until FY2027 and will not arrive in numbers until the 2030s. The analytic consensus across defense researchers is blunt: the logistics force is not enough, and not fast enough, for the demands now being placed on it.