AOL outages and service status in Maple Grove, Minnesota

Problems in the last 24 hours in Maple Grove, Minnesota

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Maple Grove, Minnesota and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Maple Grove, Minnesota

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Maple Grove and nearby locations:

• 
  Sid (@RalphVixCPA) reported 24 minutes ago from Brooklyn Park, Minnesota

  @on_germany @KaraDiDomizio No AOL email and never personally owned encyclopedias. But my grandma has an old set at lake home I used to look through on rain days.

• 
  Writer&PoeticVisions (@JaniceY13348366) reported 34 minutes ago from Maple Grove, Minnesota

  @RWPUSA @AOL He would love that type of power; what greedy narcissist wouldn't! However, to turn this country from a democracy to a authoritarian one will not come easy! He and his family makes money while living free & travel free. The power to dump many harmless poor people out as possible!

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Wakko Warner (@tjztyger) reported 3 minutes ago

  @Soaringeagle45 19 points as well. Never been an "@aol".

• 
  Dr. David Burkus (@davidburkus) reported 3 minutes ago

  WSJ profiled Bending Spoons this week — the Milan company that owns AOL, Evernote, and Vimeo, run by executives in their 30s and staffed by people who are sometimes younger than the software they've been hired to fix. It's actually a story about why so many applicants never make it through the door. Hundreds of thousands apply every year — enough that the rejection rate makes Harvard look like an easy yes — and most of them are optimizing for the wrong thing: credentials, polish, a great answer to "tell me about yourself." Almost anyone can be gracious to the person deciding their future. It's how they treat someone who can't do anything for them that's hard to fake. Last year: roughly 800,000 applications, 286 hires, an acceptance rate near 0.04% — tighter than Citadel's famously selective quant recruiting (0.36%), something like a hundred times harder than Harvard. That selectivity isn't a gut call. A dedicated team inside the company grades every interview against fixed criteria, then tracks how each hire performs months and years later, feeding the results back into the model. CEO Luca Ferrari has said the signal his team weights hardest is exactly this — how a candidate treats the people who have zero power over the outcome: the assistant, the receptionist. Not decency theater. Data: how you act in front of power is a performance; how you act in front of none is closer to the truth. That gap gets coded straight into the model, right alongside the interview scores. I'd bet you've done the reverse of this in the last week without noticing — warm with your boss, a little short with someone who couldn't do anything for you either way. Most companies say they hire for character. Very few test it anywhere the candidate isn't being watched by someone who can help them. Worth trying on your own team — just notice who's kind to the person who can't do anything for them.

• 
  Neal (@GrandpaBigDog) reported 5 minutes ago

  @Andie00471 @Soaringeagle45 19. Never had an AOL address.

• 
  HairdresserExtraordinaire (@hairgeek60) reported 5 minutes ago

  @AOL You’re kidding right. He sounds terrible.

• 
  maddy catgirlprostate (@catgirlprostate) reported 9 minutes ago

  @hzrnvm I am actually aware of this because there's a shocking amount of British pensioners who still have AOL email addresses and occasionally I need to help them set them up at work

• 
  Spookyspoon 🇺🇲 (@Spookyspoon16) reported 10 minutes ago

  @lilhousgreendor 18. Never had an AOL address. What is a paper mat?

• 
  Ghost of Jimmy Legan (@GhostofJLegan) reported 10 minutes ago

  @JebraFaushay Mergers have a nasty habit of not working out. I am thinking of Time Warner's disastrous marriage to AOL, but there are a myriad of examples.

• 
  CEOInterviews.AI (@CEOinterview) reported 13 minutes ago

  A company built on software the internet left for dead just IPO'd on the Nasdaq at roughly $25B. Bending Spoons $BSP buys tired brands, AOL, WeTransfer, Vimeo, Evernote, fixes them, and never sells. It went from zero to $1B in revenue in 10 years and closed its first trading day up 40% on a $1.68B raise. CEO Luca Ferrari on the model every advisor told him to kill: 'betting on growing primarily through acquisitions where everybody was telling us you got to focus on one product... pretty much every single company that I've seen do that, they have done much worse than we have.' A roll-up of has-been apps is now worth more than most of the startups Silicon Valley calls the future. Source: The Italian CEO @bendingspoons

• 
  Jin (@jinzurei) reported 16 minutes ago

  AOL-Time Warner was the dot-com era’s worst mistake, but PlayStation's war on user ownership is gaming's equivalent: a colossal waste vaporizing trust for control, proving that destroying consumer rights is just a brain-dead business model that burns investors every time 🤦

• 
  John Smith (@JohnSmithdqlo) reported 17 minutes ago

  @cmsinvests MSFT can never fail right? Just like AOL and Yahoo. Guaranteed to outperform the index in 40 years.