AOL outages and service status in Middlesex, New Jersey
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
Full Outage Map
- AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Middlesex, including 0 direct reports.
AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.
Problems in the last 24 hours in Middlesex, New Jersey
The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Middlesex, New Jersey and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
AOL Issues Reports Near Middlesex, New Jersey
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Middlesex and nearby locations:
-
Bill B (@Bill_B10) reported from Finderne, New Jersey@EmilBrunner1 1 point. Never AOL. I do have a 4 character Hotmail address...
-
Arte VanDerlay (@mfdash) reported from Somerville, New JerseyMine was AOL profiles I used to do it for all of my friends and now I regret not honing those skills.. by MySpace it was cake now I can’t do shit
-
Prsweety (@prsweety) reported from North Plainfield, New Jersey@AOL again please fixed server not responding issue with iPhone native app. Hasn’t worked for weeks. #aolepicfail
-
Prsweety (@prsweety) reported from North Plainfield, New Jersey@aol @AppleSupport please fix your all email issue with native mail app on iPhone. Continues to ask me for password and I've exhausted all avenues. #pleasefix
AOL Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Ragh Pandragon (@RaghPandragon) reportedThe truth is stranger. Long ago in the 90's there was still magic in the world every time you wanted to get on the internet you had to electrocute one fairy. Just one. Unfortunately disconnects were an issue. Slowly, one connection at a time, we fed all of the magic creatures into the gaping maw of oblivion to power our ICQ chats and AOL instant messengers. At least until Human Energy Update 3.9 Service Pack 2. Now every time you log in you just lose a little bit of your own soul, no fairy deaths required.
-
Jesse (@jesse_altman) reportedIf you ever find yourself scrolling X and feeling like there’s too much happening and you’re falling behind on __________ thing, zoom out and realize by even being here and a part of the conversation you’re already light years ahead of 99% of the population w/ respect to the AI renaissance we’re currently living through. We’re still so early. It’s like the days when AOL used to mail you a CD ROM to onboard you onto dial up internet - we’re there. Spending the weekend with old friends in Austin, none of whom are in tech/SaaS or marketing. They’re doctors, actors/producers, teachers, civil engineers, carpenters, etc…and most of what we talk about on this app is totally alien to them. Which is totally fine. I’m hanging with the $20/mo Claude plan crowd. Their X feed is completely different. While I get a crazy amount of knowledge from this site it comes with decent bit of anxiety as well. There’s a shitload of noise to find the actual signal. That’s the apparent trade off — a sense of impending doom and feeling like if I don’t immediately test this platform/load this skill/build this workflow/try this model, etc…in exchange for what a never ending stream of knowledge from some genuinely brilliant people.
-
Schinto Beans (@DollsEyeAvoider) reported@DaddyWarpig Based on how utterly ******* ignorant AOL news headlines read in 2003 before the Iraq invasion, this doesn't surprise me in the least. I expect it to be this bad or worse now.
-
Peetie Peete (@Peetie_Peete) reported@BrianRoemmele I was working for NyNex in NYC and installed some of the first residential ISDN data lines. Years later, folks started using dial-up internet service after getting AOL cd's in the mail. Then we graduated to DSL and thought the future is here! It's funny looking back at it all.
-
FlandoCalrissian (@FlandoCalrissan) reported@theamelia___ 19. Never had an AOL address
-
Heartlivehealer7777 (@SpGhVa7777) reported@LikeUrDiane If we stick to AOL being only for emergency use or our own military use only, that would be fine. I miss landline phones.
-
Jamie T (@jdtoelle) reported@FilipPanoski Solve your own problem if the best strategy. If that doesn't work then copy the competition. You don't need to reinvent the wheel. Friendster > MySpace > Facebook AOL Mail > Hotmail > Gmail Hotbot > Infoseek > Yahoo > Google
-
Davo (@RegisLeDavo) reportedNeed wee Phillie back down the AoL til the window shuts because I need to know what ******** is actually happening in the building
-
Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reportedAOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.
-
Bubblegum (@VeriPatriot45) reported@MapQuest Talk about a blast from the past. Didn’t know you guys still existed. You must be busy hanging out with AOL and floppy discs in the land of outdated crap.