AOL outages and service status in Middlesex, New Jersey
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
Full Outage Map
- AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Middlesex, including 0 direct reports.
AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.
Problems in the last 24 hours in Middlesex, New Jersey
The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Middlesex, New Jersey and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
AOL Issues Reports Near Middlesex, New Jersey
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Middlesex and nearby locations:
-
Prsweety (@prsweety) reported from North Plainfield, New Jersey@AOL again please fixed server not responding issue with iPhone native app. Hasn’t worked for weeks. #aolepicfail
-
Prsweety (@prsweety) reported from North Plainfield, New Jersey@aol @AppleSupport please fix your all email issue with native mail app on iPhone. Continues to ask me for password and I've exhausted all avenues. #pleasefix
-
Bill B (@Bill_B10) reported from Finderne, New Jersey@EmilBrunner1 1 point. Never AOL. I do have a 4 character Hotmail address...
-
Arte VanDerlay (@mfdash) reported from Somerville, New JerseyMine was AOL profiles I used to do it for all of my friends and now I regret not honing those skills.. by MySpace it was cake now I can’t do shit
AOL Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Reboticon (@Reboticant) reported@icpolicy @kitten_beloved @WomanCorn man its like aol in the old days I would get myself into a lot of trouble
-
一切看淡 (@Jasonliangnx) reported@cryptogle I have always firmly believed that those who looked down on the AOL team—calling them scammers—will regret it for the rest of their lives.
-
Ian ᯅ (@somenuso) reported@POTFES This is not accurate. The DMA, DSA, AI Act, and similar frameworks are not examples of member states forcing Brussels to overregulate. They are EU level regulatory projects, proposed, negotiated, adopted, and enforced through the EU institutional system. Member states are part of that machine, but pretending the problem is only national fragmentation conveniently ignores what Brussels itself is doing. And yes, a deeper internal market would be useful. Easier company formation, better access to capital, lower compliance costs, cheaper energy, and less fragmentation would help. But that is not the same as giving the Commission more power to micromanage technology. If American tech dominates, Europe should compete by building better products on honest market terms, not by regulating superior foreign companies and hoping European champions appear afterward. Markets are not static. IBM, Intel, Microsoft, Nokia, BlackBerry, Yahoo, AOL, MySpace, and many others once looked dominant in their own domains. They were challenged, displaced, or diminished because better technologies, better products, and better business models emerged. That is how real competition works. Innovation comes from builders, capital, talent, risk, and consumer choice. It does not come from Brussels officials deciding how platforms should be designed.
-
A variation of 𐤀𐤄𐤓𐤍 (@Peacock486) reported@BrianRoemmele "Family Drθne!" & the IE-like window that the desktop is *inside of* & the smooth progress bar & AOL never looked like that this is what you get with people who weren't there - and guess what, this is NORMAL in human history.
-
smartcent (@ashtakkashte) reported@hthieblot There was a website or a service that had a unified login for all your messenger apps like yahoo, msn, aol etc and you could chat with one interface
-
RichardJK (@RichardJKPE) reported@girdley The worst was Time Warner's purchase of AOL.
-
Gundam Explained (@GundamExplained) reported@Shr00msy @HMBohemond This isn't exclusive to the Gundam fandom and has been a thing since BBSs and AOL. It's individual people with bad takes and those takes are just as annoying as posts claiming 'all gundam fans' are annoying. A bunch of bored people on the internet don't speak for everyone.
-
Rhiyddun (@rhiyddun) reported@nikitabier perhaps I'm just being a nostalgic boomer dinosaur, but back when it was uunet and BBS's like BIX or AOL, and nobody got paid, you just said what you said and the various communities policed their own, tight or loose. The whole alt. tree was a bit surreal, but by and large it was real discussion, sharing of info, etc. without very many of these constant influencer flame wars for clix and a dozen reposts of something only a little further down in my feed. Now we add a whole attack vector on sanity with the short form videos Elon has said rot your brain. I don't need to bother grokadoodle and ask if there's a pattern.
-
North Node Dan ☊♐ (@NNAstrology) reported@BlackDumpling In 100 years, people will not be able to tell WTF really happened anywhere after AOL came online.
-
Don Fotsch 🌵🇺🇸 (@fotsch1) reported@munster_gene 1) the kids stuff is great for Brand 2) it’s too complicated 3) designed by “experts” (w/ any kids?) 4) it won’t get used much How do we know all this? We learned it all with AOL Parental Controls; was a KEY reason parents chose AOL; kids were the ones who knew it best (shutting it off); overall, minimal usage. anyone with kids, smiles at #2 above, in particular — engr, father of six, decade at Apple, five at AOL p.s. We will never see any stats on Apple/iPhone “kid safety” usage, due to points above; they’ll just keep taking about how they work with “experts”, who ironically, often have few or no, children.