AOL outages and service status in Selden, New York

Problems in the last 24 hours in Selden, New York

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Selden, New York and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Selden, New York

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Selden and nearby locations:

• 
  Peter Wolfinger (@PeterWolfinger) reported 13 minutes ago from Centereach, New York

  @RealTina40 They're weak.... I debate with people on the internet all the time since the 90's on AOL.... Never blocked a soul.

• 
  Tom Brennan (@ThomasB55220799) reported 21 minutes ago from Central Islip, New York

  @CatLover56577 19. Never had AOL address

• 
  Arcueid🚩Bjornstad💘(LVL 32) (@theRealArcueid) reported 31 minutes ago from Coram, New York

  @rehab_kyle @vocaloidfagboy I'm a Wizard who used to be online since the 1990s and I predate /b/, so I associate Being Online still with Trying to Be polite -the Internet went from being Virgin (aol) to chad (b) to Virgin (modern social media) in your local argot, from my pov. But alas, I never

• 
  Chuck Gaffney (@princetrunks) reported 57 minutes ago from Rocky Point, New York

  @Grummz Companies need to get over the 20th century mentality that office work needs to always be on site. Problem is many large companies still have admins who use faxes, think the internet is still AOL & who think knowing anything about computers & the internet is, "for nerds"...

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Mike Keys (@MikeKeys12119) reported 4 minutes ago

  @TexasRepublic71 I can’t find their website bc my dial up signal quit working after AOL died off. Lol

• 
  Shmuel Londner 🇮🇱 (@ShmuelLon) reported 4 minutes ago

  Something about $BSP: they bought AOL at a 5x income before tax, which is optically cheap right? The small issue is that they bought it from Apollo and imho there's zero chance Apollo got a bad deal

• 
  sixstringsavant (@sixstringsavant) reported 6 minutes ago

  @akafaceUS It used to take days to cancel AOL. Now you just have to resist the temptation of Sirius radio for $5 a month. No, would you pay $3 a month?

• 
  Time Capsule Tales (@timecaptales) reported 10 minutes ago

  On the day Michael Jackson died in 2009, the internet collapsed. The LA Times, AOL, TMZ, AIM, and several other major sites completely crashed. Searches for the King of Pop spiked to an insane ~4.2 million per minute. Google believed it was under some kind of cyber attack because of the sudden flood of people searching “Michael Jackson”. Twitter went down and Wikipedia crashed around 3:15 p.m. PDT.

• 
  Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported 11 minutes ago

  AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.

• 
  lnvalid.eth (@invalidkicks) reported 13 minutes ago

  @MapQuest Is this like AOL? wtf is a Mapquest

• 
  Jay $ick (@JaySick78) reported 16 minutes ago

  @brockpierson Damn, I forgot those days... and forget trying to download a pic from AOL online to see who you are talking to. A/S/L

• 
  StoneHillWealth (@StoneHillWealth) reported 16 minutes ago

  @kejca I was an advisor for Merrill Lynch during the dot com bubble. Henry Blodget said, to buy Yahoo, AOL, and AMZN, one was bound to be a winner. So, it depends on which package you bought. Chris is generally right, MOST of those ‘winning’ stocks of that day turned out to be garbage.

• 
  Alex Goldman (@AGoldmund) reported 16 minutes ago

  I’m reading Kara Swisher’s book about AOL which came out in 1999, and the tone of the book is like “this is the biggest company in the world! Nothing will take them down!”

• 
  AURI (@bossladyaurelia) reported 17 minutes ago

  AOL never asked me for more storage and I have emails for over 20 years….. why Gmail gotta do me like that 😫