AOL outages and service status in Spring Valley, New York

Problems in the last 24 hours in Spring Valley, New York

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Spring Valley, New York and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Spring Valley, New York

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Spring Valley and nearby locations:

• 
  Karin Lancellotti (@kanedell) reported 25 minutes ago from Congers, New York

  @AOLSupportHelp Bad gateway in NY 30 minutes

• 
  Emperor of Tomorrow ー 懲りずに • EZ-PZ🤡 🤮 (@CoryPipcinski) reported 27 minutes ago from Nanuet, New York

  @mareea_rose 20 years ago. Met a ******* an AOL dating site. 1st date she asked if we can hang at my apartment because she hit her ankle bad. She asked we can order Thai food to bring back. I said sure order whatever you want because I know nothing about Thai food. I pick her up, she …

• 
  Andrew Malin (@antiqueboy) reported 43 minutes ago from Congers, New York

  Adulting department, successful. Cancelled an email account from an old ISP that I hadn’t been on in (several? Many?) years. Sorry to those 20k plus emails that are never getting read. Goes to the graveyard in the ether, along with my AOL account.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Jay Rundle (@rundle_r) reported 4 minutes ago

  @JohannBiermann1 The bit worth adding: they never sell what they buy, so this isn't a flipper; it's more like a hospice for tired apps that turns a profit. AOL and Evernote under one Italian roof is a sentence that shouldn't exist but does.

• 
  Asinus Asinum Fricat (@Fricat) reported 5 minutes ago

  19. Never got AOL

• 
  Exceed (@Exc3ed) reported 7 minutes ago

  @koffie_ch 19 but only cause I'm Canadian and never had AOL... Otherwise, yeah....

• 
  Brett Caughran (@FundamentEdge) reported 8 minutes ago

  My playful analogy is we are in the AOL era of AI. Early stage of a revolutionary technology, but the delivery mechanism is still clunky, requiring really dumb concepts like prompt engineering. In 1996, you couldn't even imagine business models like Uber, Netflix, the iPhone, YouTube or Tesla FSD, because the technology wasn't even close to capable or cost effective enough. From 1996-2006 global data volume grew by a factor of 10,000,000x (per Gemini), but that growth was hugely deflationary (wholesale IP transit cost down 99%), i.e. good for the application layer and selectively bad for the pipe owners (telecom). Overall, the mix of massive volume growth offset against gnarly price deflation has been a, net/net, positive thing for telecom investing. Does that hold for the frontier labs? "Intelligence pipe" feels like it can be a pretty damn awesome business, but, like telecoms, the evolution of "intelligence pipe as a business" will be extremely path dependent and will require real business models with attractive unit economics to fund. Obviously most of the 90's era telecoms went bust and the assets were only financially productive for the 2nd or 3rd owners, mostly due to balance sheet issues & the subsequent closing of the capital markets window. Though capital markets have evolved materially since the early 2000's telecom bust with a regulatory environment more supportive of monopolies/oligopolies and private capital markets more supportive of funding massive cash burn (to wit, I think it's a really bad idea for Anthropic to IPO in '26, but what do I know?). So imagine that prior but like 10-100x the size of the internet. Maybe more? As in 1996 when you couldn't even envision Netflix/Uber, the iPhone or Tesla FSD, we have zero idea what 2056 looks like, but the exponential will certainly drive even more upside uncertainty in technology. idk, hard to be structurally bearish on the "intelligence pipe" and subsequently, infrastructure that feeds the pipe (though it feels certain there will be super gnarly potholes, messy shakeouts, and bankruptcies along the way, as we saw in telecom evolution), and ultimately what matters is free cash flow production, which feeds from the intersection of exponential volumes against unit level deflation. What's exciting to me with the improvement in the models, both frontier like Fable/Sol and open source like Kimi/GLM/Deep-Seek, is you are getting *closer* so seeing a real application layer possible in a very intellectually difficult sandbox like public market investing. Nearly four years from GPT 3.5 demo, we still aren't there. We are still in the "AOL era" - too slow, not competent enough, too expensive. But are we exiting that era? It feels to me like we might be. If I had to guess, my guess is the frontier labs continue to be good businesses (and extremely volatile public stocks), mostly due to the reflexive nature of capital markets & talent acquisition. But what seems really obvious, to me, is that 2026-2036 is going to be the era of the application layer, where the Travis Kalanick-style entrepreneur takes this "intelligence pipe" and envisions new & groundbreaking businesses that change the world. That entrepreneurial accelerate will drive durable and accelerating demand for the intelligence pipe, it seems. It's a really exciting time to be alive.

• 
  Dana Pico (@Dana_TFSJ) reported 9 minutes ago

  @BostonBridget .@AOL is 36 now; even if she chose to thaw out a few, and have them fertilized and implanted, how old would she be when she had her first pregnancy? Every extra year increases the odds for a bad pregnancy and disabled child. @JillFilipovic

• 
  Paul R Cavanaugh (@PauliCavanaugh) reported 11 minutes ago

  @dotkrueger You people are acting like the fanatics who occupied the last days of every bubble in history. I remember seeing the same lunatics saying AOL stock would rise to $1000 and beyond around 1999. "It's all different now stupid!" I know many of you are on margin. You'll not recover from this.

• 
  Convertible Bert (@AbstractLife) reported 12 minutes ago

  @blackhawkpryd 19 for me. Never had AOL

• 
  Antranig Dereyan (@ADereyan) reported 13 minutes ago

  Hey @HeyHeyItsConrad I’m listening to ur pod w @EBischoff on @WWE invasion & I think the real path to go down would be if Turner bought WWF & Eric had that money to bring in WWF talent into WCW & do invasion or another storyline.Might,need to say AOL merger never happens either.

• 
  Buffexx (@buffexx) reported 24 minutes ago

  THIS 7-MINUTE SENATE CROSS-EXAMINATION OF BILL GATES TEACHES MORE ABOUT DEFLECTION THAN ANY HARVARD CASE STUDY. One question. Asked four different ways. Watch how Gates stalls before admitting the restriction. "Well, partly you're using legal terms I'm not familiar with." "I don't think these are legal terms, Mr. Gates." Netscape's CEO sat right in the room. AOL bought his company later that year. Here is the masterclass in corporate defense. Never give a direct 'yes' or 'no.' Gates reframes the premise. He feigns ignorance on basic words. He forces the senator to define terms instead of arguing facts. It’s a classic deposition tactic. Shift the focus to vocabulary, and you control the clock. Media trainers charge $10,000 a day for this pivot. Gates pulled it off under federal oath.

• 
  Elefar Garcia (@ElefarG95201) reported 27 minutes ago

  @Matt_Pinner Never had an aol address but all the rest!