AOL outages and service status in Oxnard, California

Problems in the last 24 hours in Oxnard, California

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Oxnard, California and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Oxnard, California

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Oxnard and nearby locations:

• 
  bmxministry (@robertpsmart) reported 40 minutes ago from Camarillo, California

  I’m noticing that somebody seems to be messing with my accounts on AOL, my accounts bounce back-and-forth for no reason they never did that before, that looks to me like there’s criminals messing with my AOL accounts may the Lord bless you and straighten you out. GOD RULES 🇺🇸❌37

• 
  Eric Rosenberg (@EricProfits) reported 47 minutes ago from Ventura, California

  If you have an aol, Hotmail, or Yahoo email address, I'll assume you're bad with technology. That's a no go. Gmail, Proton, or your own domain are better. While you're at it, your email should be your name. Not something silly you can't up with in middle school.

• 
  Eric Rosenberg (@EricProfits) reported 52 minutes ago from Ventura, California

  @EverydayLake If I have this thought, I'm sure others have too. Just trying to help people get an edge. I can tell a lot about someone by what system they use and trust for email. For someone who is going to be working with me using modern apps, I don't trust an aol user has the skills.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Jay $ick (@JaySick78) reported 2 minutes ago

  @brockpierson Damn, I forgot those days... and forget trying to download a pic from AOL online to see who you are talking to. A/S/L

• 
  Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reported 2 minutes ago

  AOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.

• 
  Amanda Rankin (@tigerbitewand) reported 2 minutes ago

  Catfish people I mean like for real they're scamming stupid people I'm not a stupid person on XP I could actually go into the register keys and pull out Trojan horses like AOL... It was not allowed on my computer it was not one of my emails Yahoo was... Anybody else recognize how

• 
  Louis, Tencent Fan (@LouisaCommie) reported 4 minutes ago

  @IANdrewDiceClay I feel like the more interesting hypothetical would be if aol timer warner just never happened and wcw just went further into the 2000s same status quo, qoukd they eventually get a booker better then Eric and russo? I assume ny the time turner retires streaming era has started

• 
  Jamie T (@jdtoelle) reported 15 minutes ago

  @FilipPanoski Solve your own problem if the best strategy. If that doesn't work then copy the competition. You don't need to reinvent the wheel. Friendster > MySpace > Facebook AOL Mail > Hotmail > Gmail Hotbot > Infoseek > Yahoo > Google

• 
  sixstringsavant (@sixstringsavant) reported 15 minutes ago

  @akafaceUS It used to take days to cancel AOL. Now you just have to resist the temptation of Sirius radio for $5 a month. No, would you pay $3 a month?

• 
  Ned Smith (@NedSmith940069) reported 16 minutes ago

  @ToddVercoe @DrFeed5 nah dude, 1994 AOL. anyone who say "we" had it prior to then is full of ****. Maybe 1-2 kids talked to each other online, but the internet shifted with AOL in '94 - '95. Seems like a ton of large companies let employees take home their old work PCs. Suspect msft/apple funded it

• 
  Valon (@_Valon) reported 16 minutes ago

  Being on AIM, Yahoo Chat Room, and AOL chatroom was OUTRAGEOUS. 24 hour type ****

• 
  Todd AF (@BigTodd1776) reported 17 minutes ago

  @DavidShafer I thought @mapquest went out with AOL online, my bad...I do remember when cassette tape got feisty with Compact Disk for about 15 minutes, then they just went away. Bye Mapquest.

• 
  Fundamentals 🎲 🟥 (@Fundamentals21m) reported 18 minutes ago

  @boomer_btc @CitadelDaniel I had a joke that Primal was the AOL of Nostr but looking back it didn’t cause the network effect that AOL did. Both were UX quantum leaps -the internet was ready for it. Nostr not so much.