NatWest status: access issues and outage reports
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
- NatWest generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Salford, including 0 direct reports.
National Westminster Bank, commonly known as NatWest, is a major retail and commercial bank in the United Kingdom. NatWest offers current accounts, savings, investments, loans, credit cards and other financial products.
Problems in the last 24 hours in Salford, England
The chart below shows the number of NatWest reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Salford, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at NatWest. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Live Outage Map Near Salford, England
The most recent NatWest outage reports came from the following cities: Manchester, and Stalybridge.
| City | Problem Type | Report Time |
|---|---|---|
|
|
Website | 2 months ago |
|
|
Transfer | 2 months ago |
|
|
Website | 2 months ago |
|
|
Website | 4 months ago |
|
|
Login | 4 months ago |
|
|
Login | 7 months ago |
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
NatWest Issues Reports Near Salford, England
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Salford and nearby locations:
-
ImKarlLucas (@ImKarlLucas) reported from Manchester, EnglandJust been shouted at by a @NatWest_Help staff member in your #chorlton branch . I’ve been here for two hours,all the other staff were lovely.Abby the manager is a bully and is reprimanding people in the bank queue! #awful #natwest
-
Emu Hp (@RodHardpan) reported from Urmston, England@SoozUK Bloke works in NatWest January to November then takes 6 weeks off at Christmas time every year to transform into a panto dame despite knowing **** all about performing/theatre/make up This is what they think happens? Morons the lot of them urgh
-
ritesh suthar (@ritsut) reported from Salford, England@NatWestGroup is your residential NatWest mortgage phone number down? Tried calling but the line does not ring…..please help! Tel num I tried is: 0345 302 0190
-
Ian Lord (@lord_ian) reported from Wilmslow, England@NatWest_Help Hello. I found someone’s NatWest debit card in a machine in a car park this morning. Can you help with contacting the owner?
-
Stephen 🇺🇦 (@MadeByMooreWood) reported from Manchester, England@NatWest_Help I can't as I'm in work till half 4. It's almost Natwest have made it almost impossible to go into branch as most open after people have started work and close before people finish.
-
Shannon (@ShanRebec94) reported from Sale, England@Justiinahh @AskNationwide I’m also having this exact same issue. My partner sent money from nationwide to my NatWest and it hasn’t arrived. Not sure if it’s nationwide or NatWest with the issue 😫
-
Simon Burrows (@simonburrows09) reported from Sale, England@MartinSLewis Booked a holiday in August 2020 and @easyJet cancelled the flights last week Now @NatWestGroup are telling us because we booked the day we did against government travel advice nearly a year ago our NatWest travel insurance doesn’t cover us. Please Help ! #cancelled
NatWest Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
JoeRoot𓃵 (@NO_1TestBatter) reported@temporary_sw6y Right taking down this post bcz i checked from Espn & it hasn’t mentioned it as bilateral but as Natwest series so got confused.
-
Matthew Dodd (@1doddy83) reported@CoachDebs_spa lol NatWest are ****. If it wasn’t for my DD they would be gone. Most high street banks now are ******* useless. You can’t do anything with your own money without handing over your inside leg measurement
-
Ali@Makely (@MakelyStudio) reportedthe thing AI has never once been able to do is walk into a room, understand the real problem before anyone's articulated it, and make a call that changes the direction of the product. I've done that at Sky, Virgin Media, NatWest and Citibank. that's still the job. and it always will be.
-
jackduk (@jackduk1) reported@DebtFreeBy30UK I'm no expert, but it might make sense to pay minimum on your cards, throw everything at Monzo, then MBNA, Barclays then NatWest. Don't bother investing with this much debt. Squeeze some out of your weekly spend, even 30 quid a week will help. Move debt around to 0% early.
-
Funmi (@Funminz) reportedJoint borrowers earning £150,000+ can now borrow up to 6.5× their income. NatWest will lend at 6.5× for higher earners, but only if they’re borrowing 75% LTV or less. Pros Higher borrowing power — High income earners can access larger mortgages, which helps in expensive markets like London where property prices are high. More competitive offering — NatWest becomes more attractive to wealthy buyers who might otherwise go to specialist lenders. Useful for joint high earners — Couples earning £150k+ combined can stretch further to buy homes in premium areas. Potentially better rates — The article notes NatWest often has best buy rates, so borrowers may get both a high LTI and a good interest rate. Cons Higher financial risk — Borrowing 6.5x income is a big commitment. If interest rates rise or income drops, repayments can become stressful. Lower LTV allowed — To borrow at 6.5x, you must have at least a 25% deposit. That’s a huge barrier for many people. Only for high earners — This doesn’t help average income buyers struggling with affordability. It widens the gap between who can and can’t buy. Could push prices up — Allowing people to borrow more can fuel higher property prices, especially in already expensive areas. This move is good for wealthy buyers who want bigger loans, but it does nothing for regular earners and may even increase market pressure. It’s a strategic play by NatWest to attract high income clients, not a broad affordability solution.
-
Joseph Benjamin (@TheEcomLad) reported@FullyLV @Nugennath It’s not the same service though. My business partner had Coutts and was unhappy and switched to NatWest Premier. Myself, always had NatWest Premier and it’s been great overall. Have Barclays Premier too, but not many benefits compared to NW.
-
Phony Bliar (@phoneybliar) reported@guinevere_86157 19% is high by historical standards, and compares favourably with other Retail Banks e.g. RBS was down at 4% before the financial crisis, and NatWest is currently 14%. The economic impact of 30% should also be considered as this is capital that can't be used to support lending.
-
Chris Owen (@cwo1983) reported@tescomobile Upgraded in Feb 2026 with ZERO issues + NatWest Direct Debits paid monthly since July 2023. Yet @TescoMobile blames ME after their IT corrupted my file back to an old Lloyds record?! Blaming customers for internal database rollbacks violates UK GDPR Art 5(1)(d). Embarrassing.
-
Ali@Makely (@MakelyStudio) reportedI've designed products used by 50M+ people across Sky, Virgin Media, NatWest and Citibank. AI didn't make that experience less valuable. it made the gap between good judgment and no judgment impossible to ignore. here's what's actually changed in 2026...
-
Magic hat 🎩 (@themagic_tophat) reported𝗪𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗶𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗠𝗮𝗻 𝗖𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝟭𝟭𝟱 𝗱𝗲𝗰𝗶𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻? I know a certain commentator on the case (who claims insider knowledge) asserts there’s been no decision as of 2 weeks ago. But I very much doubt an initial decision is still pending - I believe it’s been issued to parties. There’s no reason why we would hear if it had. Initial decisions have never been published or leaked prior to the Final Award before. Why do I think it’s been issued? Because it’s been more than 19 months since the hearing concluded. A delay as long as 19 months for an initial decision on liability would put the integrity of the decision at risk and would raise questions over the arbitrators’ intentions (did they delay on purpose to damage it). I just can’t see them having done that. For context, NatWest Markets plc v Bilta (UK) Ltd [2021] was ordered a retrial when its decision was still waiting after 19 months at the High Court. The Master of Rolls at the Court of Appeal absolutely blasted the delay. He said decisions like these should need a good reason to take over 3 months in the courts and if they do, they get closely monitored. For it to take this long in private arbitration when there’s a requirement in the rules for a decision as soon as practicable… and the arbitrators have been working on other cases… totally inexcusable if it weren’t already out. Career enders for the arbitrators. A hearing on sanctions and final award should be quick too. So no excuses. Only 3 possibilities I see: 1) Initial decision was already issued to parties and a Final Award is coming imminently. Before the season starts. 2) They have the Final Award already but they’re waiting for the end of the World Cup before publishing it (they shouldn’t do this and it could even open themselves up to damages if this were the case) 3) City launched an appeal after the decision on liability was issued but before the hearing on sanctions, thereby delaying a Final Award Number 3) would be novel (i.e., never done before) but the rules do not explicitly prohibit it. I’ve hypothesised it as a possibility for a while. If so, we might not hear anything until 2027. The longer it goes without a Final Award, the more likely I believe that’s what’s happened.