Is NatWest down in Paignton, Borough of Torbay, England?
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
National Westminster Bank, commonly known as NatWest, is a major retail and commercial bank in the United Kingdom. NatWest offers current accounts, savings, investments, loans, credit cards and other financial products.
Full Outage Map
TransactionsProblems in the last 24 hours in Paignton, England
The chart below shows the number of NatWest reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Paignton and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at NatWest. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Most Reported Problems
The following are the most recent problems reported by NatWest users through our website.
-
Website (40%)
-
Login (29%)
-
Transactions (17%)
-
Mobile App (14%)
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
NatWest Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Clementine
(@Clemmie999) reported
@NatWest_Help App down and #NatWest telling me to use website but that’s not working! What a nightmare on a Friday. Anyone else resolved this? Currently stuck wanting to pay for food and petrol 🥹
-
Ian Whitehead
(@IanJon407) reported
@romfordgeeza @uk_sf_writer @GBNEWS not many have income in the millions obviously. and millionaires don’t have it in cash in their natwest account either obviously we are talking about wealth if you are living on the bread line and living in a multi million pound house that’s a you problem.
-
MR...🦊
(@Foxiiboii) reported
NatWest are down 🙄
-
Borderlinehxe
(@borderlinehxe) reported
@natwest what's going on!!! I need to access my bank to transfer money for a taxi. I've got an appointment in a hour for a second biopsy for skin cancer!!! Get this fixed 😭😭😭
-
Sarah Carroll
(@Carrott_87) reported
@PlankerHappy @NatWest_Help My Natwest app isn’t working either. I have managed to log into the website. But it’s been a nightmare trying to locate the card reader and all the passwords just to transfer some money. 💷
-
KingDad1
(@DavidCo28334047) reported
@RachelReevesMP She joined the Labour party to scounge as much money for herself as possible. Plus, her Natwest branch closed and her customer service job ended.
-
sid dead
(@shhhimdead) reported
@NatWest_Help can't log into the natwest app Any help available?
-
Helen Gordon
(@vipsweetslondon) reported
Thank you, Paul — I truly appreciate your support. The core anomaly in the judgment is simple but devastating: NatWest Bank either had valid authority to issue Bankers Draft No. 111111 600012 05977380 — debited to my account on 16 May 1985 and made payable on demand to O.M. Marks & Co — or it did not. There is no ambiguity. This is a binary question of fact: Yes or No. If No, then the bank draft was unauthorised, the £25,000 debit was unlawful, and NatWest’s defence has no legal foundation. The refusal of the Court to compel an answer to this question — or to require a reply to my sworn affidavit reply to its further and better particulars of defence pleadings — amounts to a deliberate suppression of truth and a 35 year denial of justice. Fraud unravels everything
-
Helen Gordon
(@vipsweetslondon) reported
What is the difference between the letter of the law and this judgment? The core anomaly in the judgment is simple but devastating: NatWest Bank either had valid authority to issue Bankers Draft No. 111111 600012 05977380 — debited to my account on 16 May 1985 and made payable on demand to O.M. Marks & Co — or it did not. There is no ambiguity. This is a binary question of fact: Yes or No. If No, then the bank draft was unauthorised, the £25,000 debit was unlawful, and NatWest’s defence has no legal foundation. The refusal of the Court to compel an answer to this question — or to require a reply to my sworn affidavit reply to its further and better particulars of defence pleadings — amounts to a deliberate suppression of truth and a 35 year denial of justice. Fraud unravels everything
-
Helen Gordon
(@vipsweetslondon) reported
Thank you, Paul — I truly appreciate your support. The core anomaly in the judgment is simple but devastating: NatWest Bank either had valid authority to issue Bankers Draft No. 111111 600012 05977380 — debited to my account on 16 May 1985 and made payable on demand to O.M. Marks & Co — or it did not. There is no ambiguity. This is a binary question of fact: Yes or No. If No, then the bank draft was unauthorised, the £25,000 debit was unlawful, and NatWest’s defence has no legal foundation. The refusal of the Court to compel an answer to this question — or to require a reply to my sworn affidavit reply to its further and better particulars of defence pleadings — amounts to a deliberate suppression of truth and a 35 year denial of justice. Fraud unravels everything