NatWest status: access issues and outage reports

Problems in the last 24 hours in Biggleswade, England

The chart below shows the number of NatWest reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Biggleswade, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

NatWest Issues Reports Near Biggleswade, England

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Biggleswade and nearby locations:

• 
  Gavin Wrigley (@pheauteau) reported 25 minutes ago from Buntingford, England

  @NatWest_Help just updated to iOS 14.6, the NatWest app no longer allows log in, still works on 14.5, so needs to be looked at by the app developers. Have done all the usual delete and reinstall etc.

• 
  Gavin Wrigley (@pheauteau) reported 34 minutes ago from Buntingford, England

  @RealTranswoman @NatWest_Help As long as it takes, our options to try beta software, not NatWest’s issue.

• 
  Holly O (@ohhollygosh) reported 50 minutes ago from Biggleswade, England

  @RedLetterDaysUK Hi, I just exchanged some Natwest rewards into vouchers and purchased an experience using some of the vouchers. I have £120 worth of vouchers & have redeemed one experience to the value of £75. However the website is saying I’ve redeemed them all?

NatWest Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Teds (@Tedtalks13) reported 2 minutes ago

  I’ll go through the hole list of **** again Monday. Hmcts re the complaint of case file empty. (Wasn’t me on that hearing @Experian don’t care if she threatens to slit her wrists) Lloyds (and its energy company ) HSBC (and its estate agent and energy company) NatWest (just so you know did you birmingham wood fraud) Companies house (IT error) IPO office (reference your reference is one efficiency companies house) Ovo energy and its tupe (2p) sse notice transfer audit issue with eon Then a list of those law firms that agreed in 2018 to the bent bet that I found out about; that in those law firms they were involved in the house court case that moved even though stayed in any application existed @HMCTSgovuk has the walsal court Brough the police in yet and when can I see the hybrid video to show it wasn’t me

• 
  Srijan (@ImSrijanG) reported 2 minutes ago

  @prasannalara algorithm podunga sir. Any chance of India chasing this down? Giving Natwest Final 2002 vibes

• 
  Teds (@Tedtalks13) reported 3 minutes ago

  So NatWest when you go to put on that about £83 interest on the 17:17 of that; did she think I hadnt picked that up on top of the £110 ipo renewal ah yes that as well that puts a depression on not going to be paid again. Ha ha ha. Hu Hu Hu the same as the £244 M&S grrrrrrr ugh we thought we as HSBC shifty as **** moving Helen’s name from plc to uk… though we had screwed her … um how? It wasnt me on that experian hearing it was the **** that tried an asb to not have its name mentioned : car perks morons blind as **** . While pre arranged lawyers won’t be able to enact for them on that nda framework that connects to the fraud of Coller ip and maths squires and leopard print scraggy “something like that” of those don’t forget ice box. That’s been in my suitcase and file on “days away “ did you know I see my doctor every month and the same issues is the illnesses physical over a parrot of remember need medicals we thing we ****** your on the medical point so you can’t find out about what we paid her and the other her and the other her on it’s what’s app… to do Joe davies doesn’t sound like a vaping hag either on court hearings … re the house steve .. who bought it “totally is the landlords fraud”

• 
  Linda Pennock🙂 (@LindaPennock1) reported 6 minutes ago

  @bsd_junkie @DamianLow3 No, the bank did not back Alison Rose over Nigel Farage; instead, Rose resigned as CEO of NatWest after admitting she leaked private customer details to a journalist.

• 
  Lorraine Morris (@MLorrM) reported 6 minutes ago

  In the case of Perks v NatWest Markets Plc (evidence given around 2022), Mr Neil Graham — a GRG director, chartered accountant and experienced banker — was cross-examined under oath about the bank’s RMP credit system entries for swap-related credit lines / contingent obligations (often referred to as CLU – Credit Line Utilisation). Key exchanges reported in the materials include: 🔹Mr Graham accepted that the credit-line entry on the RMP system represented the client’s contingent obligation. 🔹Mr Graham agreed it was a factor the bank used when considering in loan-to-value calculations for the overall connection. 🔹When asked whether it could push a connection over a loan-to-value ratio covenant, he answered (subject to market movements) yes. 🔹He further accepted that this could ultimately lead to the connection being transferred into GRG. 🔹Mr Graham is experienced and the testimony is truthful; however, as happened in Ireland - bank’s counsel later attempted to “distance the bank from this evidence in closing submissions”. 🔹Surprise, surprise but bank’s counsel is categorically misleading the Court. 🔹They characterised Graham’s answers as given “on the hoof,” - said it was not his specialist area and submitted that he was wrong on the LTV impact point. 🔹They argued the bank did not accept that the CLU had the effect claimed and that there was no duty to volunteer information about it to the customer. 🔹This was what bank counsel is required to do to keep the charade going and that they cavalierly do so is a scandal in itself. 🔹Mr Graham’s testimony exists and is on the public record, as circulated by campaigners and referenced in related presentations. 🔹So, a senior bank director & chartered accountant with a GRG/risk-adjacent role did accept under oath that the credit line could cause or contribute to an LTV breach and subsequent transfer into GRG. 🔹This is rather obvious and is in fact why the products were sold in the first instance - as confirmed by numerous insiders. 🔹NatWest’s formal position in that case (and more generally) has been to treat such lines as “internal risk measures” rather than customer-facing hard liabilities that automatically breach covenants in the way alleged, and to reject the broader fraud characterisation. But that would be their formal position would it not? When billions of euros is at stake? 🔹Meanwhile customers faced enormous break costs & this fact alone is wholly inconsistent with the characterisation of the credit line as a purely internal risk measure. 🔹It is however consistent with the reality, which is that the bank had booked (and later crystallised) an exposure against their customers and the credit line had been concealed. 🔹That bank counsel filed pleadings that falsely characterised these structures as just fixing an interest rate or just ordinary fixed-rate loans, facilitating the burying of the misrepresentations under layers of legal process - is a further scandal - akin to that whereby the lawyers who managed to lock up innocent sub-postmasters on foot of unsound evidence. 🔹The result for Irish SMEs duped by theses practices was a systematic extraction of value from those SMEs - while the guilty institution and its lawyers ensured that accountability remained permanently out of reach. @ArturNadol7566 @Wftproof

• 
  Ian Darbyshire (@Ian_darbyshire) reported 8 minutes ago

  @stevemiddi1 @ArturNadol7566 @LloydsBank I have the internal Natwest interest forecasts and they were all going down at that time.

• 
  LiveSquawk (@LiveSquawk) reported 9 minutes ago

  NatWest H1 2026 Earnings - Q2 Pretax Oper Profit GBP 2.29B (est 2.01B) - H1 Impairment Charge Of £280 M, Prev Y/Y £226 M - Keeps Ordinary *** Around 50% Attributable Profit - Sees 2026 ROTE +19% - Still Sees 2028 ROTE Above +18% - Still Sees 2028 Customer Assets And Liabilities Rising +4% From End 2025

• 
  Le Ref (@LeRef5) reported 9 minutes ago

  @Feargal_Sharkey @NatWestGroup It was the public authorities that delayed it that long you halfwit. The plans were formed in 1940s (public control) The land was bought in 1975 (public control) Plans were dropped in 1976 after a Public Inquiry on the back of NIMBYism (public ownership) Plans were revised in the mid 90s and not pursued as there was not sufficient identified demand. Mid West water only merged with SE water in 2007 so the history has nothing to do with them. Nat West's Pension Fund owns a 25% stake, not NatWest. Plans were revised in 2013 and hit the usual barrier - locals, NIMBYs and organised groups have been campaigning against it for decades. So sure, it's all down to the evil privatised companies

• 
  puristini (@jurisdoctrine) reported 11 minutes ago

  Emails included Wells Fargo Bank ING Direct HSBC Bank NatWest Capital One Citibank Chase Bank Dubai Abu Dhabi London Nigeria I opened accounts with login access as well. I went into both Chase and Citibank to deposit cheques sent by FedEx and UPS delivery service.

• 
  Paul Foster (@OldFozzy) reported 12 minutes ago

  @TiceRichard More likely the bankers, Couts & Natwest. Couts CEO in cahoots with the BBC shut down Nigels account a while ago, remember? and had to make a settlement with him because "his views being considered incompatible with the bank's "values or purpose". Revenge or what?