Post Office outages and service status in Penzance, England

Problems in the last 24 hours in Penzance, England

The chart below shows the number of Post Office reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Penzance, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

Post Office Issues Reports Near Penzance, England

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Penzance and nearby locations:

• 
  Chris Wood (@PDQProperty) reported 17 minutes ago from Penzance, England

  @PostOffice this “advice” is so bad, it’s bordering on the criminally negligent.

• 
  ˜”*°•.˜”*°• Jolly Jingle Jacki 🤶🏻 •°*”˜.•°*”˜ (@JackiHicks) reported 45 minutes ago from Hayle, England

  After paying for ‘1st Class - Signed For Delivery’ on the 10th December I am very disappointed with @RoyalMail @PostOffice for not delivering a birthday card and gift to my niece for her birthday TODAY 🙁 Why offer and charge for this service if you can’t deliver on time?

Post Office Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  The_Real_Bale (@Davebale) reported 8 minutes ago

  @CryptoCraig18 @lily_lna @PostOffice Never said she couldn't 🤫

• 
  அமுதன் (@Amuthan2657) reported 8 minutes ago

  @AmazonHelp my order 403-4692438-1716323,I received a very poor-quality/suspected fake productDOCTOR FEEL SOFT I initiated a return, but Amazon is asking me to send through the PostOffice.This is not possible for me.arrange doorstep pickup and process my full refund immediately.

• 
  Vania Burnell (@VaniaBurnell) reported 9 minutes ago

  @n_xddy @lily_lna @PostOffice What a vile piece of **** you are!

• 
  NicTheGreek1979 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧 (@GreekTheNic) reported 10 minutes ago

  @Wooflexis @lily_lna @PostOffice The Pakistani grooming gangs are 2nd and 3rd gen immigrants. Yes. I have a problem with immigrants.

• 
  Artur Nadolny (@ArturNadol7566) reported 11 minutes ago

  POST OFFICE REWRITES ITS OWN SCANDAL I was reading through the Post Office Process Review page on the corporate @PostOffice website when one paragraph was cought my attention... The PPR, was set up after the Common Issues Judgment in March 2019, the ruling that came out of Alan Bates and others versus Post Office Limited and first forced Post Office to admit its Horizon accounting system was unreliable and that postmasters had been wrongly blamed for shortfalls the system itself created. "Since the Common Issues Judgment in March 2019, we have carried out work across the business to identify products, policies or processes that may have caused financial loss to Postmasters because of the way they were designed or delivered." The background section on the page says Post Office has carried out work to identify products, policies or processes that may have caused financial loss to postmasters because of the way they were designed or delivered. That phrasing removes Post Office as the party doing the designing and delivering. The losses did not just happen because of how something was designed, Post Office designed it. "We wish to put this right in a straightforward and transparent way, and we have therefore set up the Post Office Process Review to provide financial redress for current and former Postmasters who were impacted." A line further down says Post Office wishes to put this right in a straightforward and transparent way. That reads as voluntary goodwill. What actually happened is a court judgment forced Post Office to admit fault after years of fighting the litigation that proved it, and the PPR exists because of that judgment, not out of an independent wish to be transparent. "You may be aware that there have also been other redress schemes available for people impacted by the Horizon IT Scandal. You can submit a request to the Post Office Process Review whether or not you have separately received a payment or have a case in progress through any of those other redress schemes." Then comes the paragraph that caught my attention most. It tells readers there have also been other redress schemes available for people impacted by the Horizon IT Scandal, and that a postmaster can apply to the PPR whether or not they have already received a payment through one of those other schemes. Read on its own, with no background on the case, this makes Post Office sound like an intermediary. Something called the Horizon IT Scandal happened to postmasters, and Post Office is now helping them access redress for it, alongside other schemes that also exist to help. Post Office built and ran the Horizon system. Post Office prosecuted postmasters using data from that system. Post Office fought the litigation that eventually proved the system was flawed, for years, at public expense, before the judgment forced its hand. The redress schemes named here, including the PPR itself, exist because Post Office caused the losses they compensate. The page also treats the PPR issues and the Horizon IT Scandal as two separate subjects, one involving products, policies and processes, the other a scandal that happened elsewhere, to other people, through other schemes. A postmaster or anybody else reading this without prior context could reasonably conclude that Post Office is a well-meaning administrator cleaning up a mess it did not create. Most people who land on this page are not journalists or campaigners. They are current or former postmasters, or their family members, trying to work out if they are owed money and how to ask for it, and many will not have followed the litigation, the public inquiry, or the years of reporting that established what actually happened. For that reader, the framing on this page is the information. If it tells them Post Office is helping victims of a scandal rather than admitting to causing one, that is what they will take away, and it will shape how much scrutiny they think the process deserves. Post Office has spent years controlling how this story gets told, first by denying there was a problem at all, then by fighting compensation claims, and now by writing its own compensation scheme in language that keeps the institution at arm's length from what it did. The wording on this page is small. The pattern is not.

• 
  Reel Buddy (@Daddyzoom) reported 11 minutes ago

  @lily_lna @PostOffice I read it as if you worked there then realised you were a customer. How strange those staff thought they can tell you what to wear. I can imagine who the staff are.

• 
  SammyKattan 🇦🇹🇮🇶🇮🇱 (@SammyHistorian) reported 15 minutes ago

  @lily_lna @PostOffice WTF. You have my support. Nice outfit btw

• 
  SussexGal 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇮🇪🇬🇧 (@dino868) reported 15 minutes ago

  Sadly, there's only one thing that these private equity firms know and want : #MONEY!! 🫰💰 Until greed and huge profits are a thing of the past (which of course will never happen), this is a trend that will only worsen! #PostOffice

• 
  Eneri (@Eneri96752758) reported 16 minutes ago

  @lily_lna @PostOffice Don’t understand the problem. You’re not showing anything inappropriate.

• 
  Jay (@Jay509596096813) reported 17 minutes ago

  @Jenny_1884 What the same ed davey and the postoffice scandle?? What, is he trying to score brownie points thinking uts gona help him. His time will come in court!