AOL outages and service status in Uxbridge, England
No problems detected
If you are having issues, please submit a report below.
Full Outage Map
- AOL generated 0 outage signals in the last 24 hours around Uxbridge, including 0 direct reports.
AOL (America Online) is an internet portal as well as an internet service provider. As an ISP, AOL offers dial up internet through its AOL Advantage plans.
Problems in the last 24 hours in Uxbridge, England
The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Uxbridge, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.
At the moment, we haven't detected any problems at AOL. Are you experiencing issues or an outage? Leave a message in the comments section!
Community Discussion
Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.
Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.
AOL Issues Reports Near Uxbridge, England
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Uxbridge and nearby locations:
-
-
LDN Scottie Pippen (@Alessandro_Babs) reported from Brentford, England@KwakuMMNT 112 by default. Jagged Edge were broadcasting to us using 2001 AOL dial up. Horrible signal.
-
Jamie🐝 (@JL_BrentfordFC) reported from Hounslow, EnglandAOL would never go down. Is AOL still a thing?
-
Lee 'Budgie' Barnett (@budgie) reported from Richmond, EnglandCompuServe when I first got online in 1995, MSN Messenger, the very occasional foray into Usenet. Tried AOL, ICQ, a few others. But never enjoyed them. Had both AIM and Yahoo Meseenger But only very rarely used them.
-
Matt Stephens (@RealStephens) reported from West Molesey, England@sigmasports I’m doing my best guys, bear with me. I’m doing an online chat with AOL online support and have Ask Jeeves fired up in another browser.
-
Josa Keyes (@JosaKeyes) reported from Ealing, England@Miss_Snuffy Self pity finds many friends online from the earliest days of community forums up to today's toxic social media. "Share your support" we used to say at AOL and people did and lots was valuable, but a deep streak of 'alternative truth' bedded down there too to solicit attention.
-
Robbo (@sjr66qpr) reported from Richmond, England@londongirluk @AOLSupportHelp I'm the same Julie. The app I'm using won't let me sign in
-
anthony (@edgfrg) reported from Slough, England@AOLSupportHelp I’m trying to get into my email password help
-
Doug (@dougmortonagain) reported from Ealing, EnglandThe first PlayStation came out, and Macs transitioned to Power PC. AOL is launched. Amazon was founded. Microsoft announces it will no longer sell or support the MS-DOS operating system separately from Microsoft Windows
-
Lorraine King (@lorrainemking) reported from Brentford, England@NW6Rd You've just reminded me my contract is up with my absolutely appalling @SkyUK broadband. It's so slow it's like AOL dial-up
-
Paddy 🇵🇱 (@slavicking18) reported from Windsor, EnglandI still have an AOL email address so never question my loyalty
AOL Issues Reports
Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:
-
Miss EsqHire (@MissEsqHire) reportedMy candidate at a small, no-name firm is about to turn down an offer from an international law firm because they use Harvey and his current firm uses Claude. Apparently he cannot live without Claude. Can someone explain the difference to me like I’m my mom in the ’90s discovering AOL? Any arguments for Harvey that I can retort with?
-
Gary Eppenbaugh (@garyeppenbaugh) reported@MapQuest Holy hell, we thought you went to go hang out with Ask Jeeves for the weekend at his mountain cabin with Napster, Netscape, and AOL Instant Messenger
-
Rakesh Agrawal (@RakeshSFNYC) reportedBeyond the usual senior leadership problems at AOL that doomed Mapquest, there was another: channel conflict. Mapquest had a LOB that was store locators. They would sell widgets to retailers and other businesses that they could put on their own sites. Split personalities like that are always tough. When one side is paying the bills (store locator) it's hard to ship the future.
-
Jamie T (@jdtoelle) reported@FilipPanoski Solve your own problem if the best strategy. If that doesn't work then copy the competition. You don't need to reinvent the wheel. Friendster > MySpace > Facebook AOL Mail > Hotmail > Gmail Hotbot > Infoseek > Yahoo > Google
-
Tai (@TaiSmitty2) reported@MapQuest Holy ****!!! Does Netscape still exist too? What about AOL?
-
Ang•el / מלאך (@AngelCWilliams) reportedRabbis and Rabbonias Tell Us Eliyahu Kin Shepardic David the Prince Used Illegal AOL Punters To Harbor My Bad Boy Entertainment Account
-
SandSculptor856 🏴☠️ (@Michael84488352) reported@chadmask_msu @OleMissRebel90 I’m looking for my login for Mapquest on AOL. Hang on.
-
DJ Richards (@stumblebum54) reportedI’ve come to realize that Facebook is the AOL of social media. Horrible app developers. Probably hired them all from AOL.
-
StoneHillWealth (@StoneHillWealth) reported@kejca I was an advisor for Merrill Lynch during the dot com bubble. Henry Blodget said, to buy Yahoo, AOL, and AMZN, one was bound to be a winner. So, it depends on which package you bought. Chris is generally right, MOST of those ‘winning’ stocks of that day turned out to be garbage.
-
Daniil (@DaniilBuilds) reportedAOL and Time Warner didn’t just pay for what the two companies were worth in January 2000. They paid for what they believed the two companies could become together. The announced merger was valued at roughly $350B, with AOL shareholders expected to own about 55% of the combined company. The logic was easy to understand: combine AOL’s internet business with Time Warner’s media assets and create value neither could generate alone. But there was a financial problem hiding inside that logic. Future synergies are uncertain. The merger closed in January 2001. SEC disclosures later put the acquisition cost at approximately $147B. Then came the accounting reckoning. In 2002, the combined company reported a $98.7B net loss, including a $54.2B goodwill impairment. That $54.2B was non-cash. It did not mean the company suddenly paid out $54.2B in cash. It meant the value previously assigned to acquired goodwill could no longer be supported at the same level. That distinction matters. When you pay upfront for future synergies, you are effectively putting a price on value that still depends on execution. If the synergies arrive, the premium can make sense. If they don’t, shareholders can end up carrying the cost. The most expensive synergy is the one you pay for before you prove it exists.