AOL outages and service status in Southall, England

Problems in the last 24 hours in Southall, England

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Southall, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Live Outage Map Near Southall, England

The most recent AOL outage reports came from the following cities: Wembley.

City	Problem Type	Report Time
Wembley	E-mail	1 month ago
Ealing	E-mail	6 months ago

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Southall, England

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Southall and nearby locations:

• 
  Doug (@dougmortonagain) reported 5 minutes ago from Ealing, England

  The first PlayStation came out, and Macs transitioned to Power PC. AOL is launched. Amazon was founded. Microsoft announces it will no longer sell or support the MS-DOS operating system separately from Microsoft Windows

• 
  LDN Scottie Pippen (@Alessandro_Babs) reported 20 minutes ago from Brentford, England

  @KwakuMMNT 112 by default. Jagged Edge were broadcasting to us using 2001 AOL dial up. Horrible signal.

• 
  Robbo (@sjr66qpr) reported 20 minutes ago from Richmond, England

  @londongirluk @AOLSupportHelp I'm the same Julie. The app I'm using won't let me sign in

• 
  Patti Fordyce (@pattif21) reported 28 minutes ago from Kensington, England

  @JackReganUK Even older than you: never had a MySpace account or zn AOL email address

• 
  Dan Calladine (@dancall) reported 32 minutes ago from Wandsworth, England

  @neilperkin You'd think they could find a fix. This used to happen with all AOL accounts showing up as 'Virginia' 20 years ago!

• 
  Matt Stephens (@RealStephens) reported 33 minutes ago from West Molesey, England

  @sigmasports I’m doing my best guys, bear with me. I’m doing an online chat with AOL online support and have Ask Jeeves fired up in another browser.

• 
  Lee 'Budgie' Barnett (@budgie) reported 35 minutes ago from Richmond, England

  CompuServe when I first got online in 1995, MSN Messenger, the very occasional foray into Usenet. Tried AOL, ICQ, a few others. But never enjoyed them. Had both AIM and Yahoo Meseenger But only very rarely used them.

• 
  Jamie🐝 (@JL_BrentfordFC) reported 43 minutes ago from Hounslow, England

  AOL would never go down. Is AOL still a thing?

• 
  Lorraine King (@lorrainemking) reported 44 minutes ago from Brentford, England

  @NW6Rd You've just reminded me my contract is up with my absolutely appalling @SkyUK broadband. It's so slow it's like AOL dial-up

• 
  Robbo (@sjr66qpr) reported 48 minutes ago from Richmond, England

  @londongirluk @AOLSupportHelp Still not working 😠

• 
  Josa Keyes (@JosaKeyes) reported 53 minutes ago from Ealing, England

  @Miss_Snuffy Self pity finds many friends online from the earliest days of community forums up to today's toxic social media. "Share your support" we used to say at AOL and people did and lots was valuable, but a deep streak of 'alternative truth' bedded down there too to solicit attention.

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Misty Burrell (@EmBeance) reported 2 minutes ago

  @oelma__ Don't forget AOL. I had an AOL and a yahoo. A Hotmail I never used too.

• 
  Pete Koenig, Sr. (@petekoenig84) reported 3 minutes ago

  @honeymoon250 18, never had AOL or a waterbed.

• 
  RLDThree (@RLDThree) reported 4 minutes ago

  @Pirat_Nation PSN is always going down. Worst online service since AOL. Anyway, it's an excuse for the physical media moaners to start up.

• 
  Sergio Vengeance 🇺🇲🎮🤘 (@SergioVengeance) reported 8 minutes ago

  @JoelKatz @RealZaikTorek @Awk20000 Not to mention the very first big section 230 case was about AOL and them being too slow to censor a malicious troll who was spreading confirmed lies that led to harassment. So even if the argument is "the website didn't censor this" then that's a core Section 230 argument.

• 
  The maestro (@maestroslay) reported 12 minutes ago

  Marc Andreessen wrote a browser at 22 and took a company with no profits public at $2,900,000,000 in a single day. He built Mosaic as a student employee at the University of Illinois supercomputing center, paid $6.85 an hour. It was the first browser that showed images alongside text. The university claimed the software. He left for California, and Jim Clark, who had already founded Silicon Graphics, funded him to build it again from scratch. Netscape Navigator shipped in late 1994 and took most of the web inside months. The IPO came in August 1995, 16 months after founding. The company had almost no revenue and no profit at all. Shares were set at $28 and opened at $71. The close valued Netscape near $2,900,000,000. Wall Street had never priced a company on future users instead of earnings. Every dot-com listing that followed used the template. Microsoft bundled Internet Explorer with Windows for free. Netscape sold to AOL in 1999 and the browser disappeared. He co-founded Andreessen Horowitz in 2009 and now writes the checks. He proved a company could be worth billions before it made a dollar.

• 
  Poopeye™ (@ThePoopeye) reported 15 minutes ago

  How do all these people have 10s of thousands of "followers"? People that don't necessarily post anything new or just re-posts of other peoples' thoughts & work. I don't get it. I've been a member for a while now (w/ THIS acct - my orig was cancelled by Twitter during COVID for telling the factual scientific truth about masks based on my years in Bio-Nanotechnology). Is it strictly from those "Follow" train lists? I learned early on to stay away from those - I check out EVERYBODY I ever follow first & personally (not necessarily relying upon Grok's "Profile Summary", although those may get me interested to take a gander). I try to engage those who engage with me and avoid silly flame-wars. I don't post to GET followers, I generally post current stream-of-consciousness thoughts, what's on my mind at that moment & not really organizing them into proper English "articles". Plus I'm not really good at pithy comments - I speak from my heart & soul and EXPLAIN myself & my reasoning for coming to different conclusions. And I typically don't engage in irrational, emotional hyperbole & name-calling. I truly want to know what others think and LEARN (you're never too old to learn!). For DECADES on BBSes (Bulletin Board Systems - pre-graphical internet days, modem-connected social systems for discussion, research & debates), the Usenets (newsgroups, pre-graphical/HTTP/HTML internet days when time on the internet was purchased through 3rd party vendors like CompuServe by the hour - 70s & 80s, pre-AOL (which is slightly pre-HTTP/HTML/Mozilla-Netscape graphical internet revolution) - where everything was command-line driven in ASCII, EBCDIC, ISO set or ATASCII or the like). Am I just too old, boring, long-winded, obnoxious, opinionated or what? I know its annoying with me posting about my health, but I've gotta vent SOMEWHERE and NO ONE on X knows me personally. Not that it matters so much now, I'm heading down the stretch-run to Home plate, but even paying for Elon's blue-checkmark, I don't get many hits/views or responses/engagement, it is pretty comparable to my "free" account that I use solely for NFL stuff where I have 1 whole "follower", which is probably one of those online ho-bags. It's not that I'm looking to "earn" from X and I'll NEVER post things just for click-bait value. I'm just really curious how these other accounts accrue so many followers for literally not doing much,

• 
  brian farley (@brianfarley6) reported 17 minutes ago

  @earthlink sucks. I'm 2 weeks into my new 5G service a day ir is plagued with problems. It runs like AOL

• 
  Jon Morgan 🇺🇦 (@JonMorganDP) reported 17 minutes ago

  19. I never had an AOL address.

• 
  Bill Bishop (@niubi) reported 21 minutes ago

  This pro-PRC model industry group from Silicon Valley is interesting but I think not thinking long-term. Why can’t the frontier labs do something like AOL did with its Greenhouse project and say OK, I will let you distill but we want equity in your company and/or a fee. AOL got equity for promotion/placement on the screen. (we committed 30+ million at MarketWatch, helped traffic and the ipo a lot, but worst company I have ever negotiated with). Anyway, apologies for the digression, but why couldn’t this be similar but for distillation access, and the labs like Anthropic and OpenAI could end up with a really interesting portfolio of companies, some of which might become quite valuable, and those smaller firms’ VCs could also benefit? Otherwise, does it really make sense for a huge swathe of the American technology industry to end up dependent on PRC models? Haven’t we learned any lessons from other industries where PRC firms have been able to come in at a very low cost with good products and effectively create dependencies that crowd at all other competitors? And now we are talking about the most transformative industry in many years, and it could be even worse if it’s built in part through some problematic practices in terms of distillation attacks and export control violations, if some of US government’s and frontier labs’ claims are true?

• 
  Buzzy Ritter (@buzzy8510) reported 23 minutes ago

  @honeymoon250 19. Never had an AOL account.