AOL outages and service status in Gillingham, England

Problems in the last 24 hours in Gillingham, England

The chart below shows the number of AOL reports we have received in the last 24 hours from users in Gillingham, England and surrounding areas. An outage is declared when the number of reports exceeds the baseline, represented by the red line.

Community Discussion

Tips? Frustrations? Share them here. Useful comments include a description of the problem, city and postal code.

Beware of "support numbers" or "recovery" accounts that might be posted below. Make sure to report and downvote those comments. Avoid posting your personal information.

AOL Issues Reports Near Gillingham, England

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in Gillingham and nearby locations:

• 
  Phil Lee (@PhilLeePhotos) reported 9 minutes ago from Gillingham, England

  @AOLSupportHelp Hi AOL, we are having terrible speed /connection problems and we have switched router on and off. How do we get this rectified,. My wife's trying to work from home and it's causing no end of problems. Cheers Phil

• 
  🌸TILLI🌸 @ FFXIV (ARR) (@kthxsayonara) reported 20 minutes ago from Saint Mary Hoo, England

  AOL have deleted more than half of the saved emails in my inbox and now I’ve lost the email containing the serial codes for Eleanor Forte AI, Synth V Studio Pro and Natsuki Karin AI. I’ve managed to send an email to Anicute but AHS want a support number (was in a deleted email…)

• 
  Spaceman - Andy G (@SpacemanCre8) reported 23 minutes ago from Ditton, England

  Can safely say that @AOL @aolmail @AOLSupportHelp have proved to have the worst customer service I have ever experienced. No way of contacting other than email, no acknowledgement that Mail account can’t be accessed, no way of resetting password. No help at all. Disgusting.

• 
  Maxine Sweetman-Ive (@sweetmax22) reported 26 minutes ago from Southend-on-Sea, England

  @BekoUK I bought a Beko VCS5125AR Upright Vacuum Cleaner in Red from AOL 27/2/21 and in the past week it has cut out after using it for 10mins and did not restart for 20mins. Not happy. I would like it swapped for a hoover that works competently for the use it was bought for!

• 
  Donna Connor (@ding_dong1967) reported 40 minutes ago from Sittingbourne, England

  Shocking service from @curryspcworld today - waited in for 6.5hrs for a dishwasher that never turned up. Two different stories from the driver, both of which were crap. Now ordered with @AOL who will hopefully do a better job on Tuesday 👍🏻

• 
  Phil Lee (@PhilLeePhotos) reported 51 minutes ago from Gillingham, England

  @AOLSupportHelp Hi AOL, we seem to be having terrible speed /connection problems. How do I get this rectified, as its causing massive problems our working from home. I've tried switching it on and off but still having problems Cheers Phil

• 
  Phil Lee (@PhilLeePhotos) reported 58 minutes ago from Gillingham, England

  @Cook_Estates @AOLSupportHelp At least I'm not the only one, was just on point of thumping laptop in frustration. 🙄 So will remain calm, now I know it's not problem at my end.

• 
  Martine Louise (@martinegilbert7) reported 60 minutes ago from Minster-on-Sea, England

  I wanted salad and Coles law. Un fortunately service was Too s low. So in stead. I listened to Sheryl Crow also Cheryl Cole. Oslo a little simply red. AND blues boys. While writing my c.v. On my AOL A/C #rtitbot

AOL Issues Reports

Latest outage, problems and issue reports in social media:

• 
  Brett Caughran (@FundamentEdge) reported 10 minutes ago

  My playful analogy is we are in the AOL era of AI. Early stage of a revolutionary technology, but the delivery mechanism is still clunky, requiring really dumb concepts like prompt engineering. In 1996, you couldn't even imagine business models like Uber, Netflix, the iPhone, YouTube or Tesla FSD, because the technology wasn't even close to capable or cost effective enough. From 1996-2006 global data volume grew by a factor of 10,000,000x (per Gemini), but that growth was hugely deflationary (wholesale IP transit cost down 99%), i.e. good for the application layer and selectively bad for the pipe owners (telecom). Overall, the mix of massive volume growth offset against gnarly price deflation has been a, net/net, positive thing for telecom investing. Does that hold for the frontier labs? "Intelligence pipe" feels like it can be a pretty damn awesome business, but, like telecoms, the evolution of "intelligence pipe as a business" will be extremely path dependent and will require real business models with attractive unit economics to fund. Obviously most of the 90's era telecoms went bust and the assets were only financially productive for the 2nd or 3rd owners, mostly due to balance sheet issues & the subsequent closing of the capital markets window. Though capital markets have evolved materially since the early 2000's telecom bust with a regulatory environment more supportive of monopolies/oligopolies and private capital markets more supportive of funding massive cash burn (to wit, I think it's a really bad idea for Anthropic to IPO in '26, but what do I know?). So imagine that prior but like 10-100x the size of the internet. Maybe more? As in 1996 when you couldn't even envision Netflix/Uber, the iPhone or Tesla FSD, we have zero idea what 2056 looks like, but the exponential will certainly drive even more upside uncertainty in technology. idk, hard to be structurally bearish on the "intelligence pipe" and subsequently, infrastructure that feeds the pipe (though it feels certain there will be super gnarly potholes, messy shakeouts, and bankruptcies along the way, as we saw in telecom evolution), and ultimately what matters is free cash flow production, which feeds from the intersection of exponential volumes against unit level deflation. What's exciting to me with the improvement in the models, both frontier like Fable/Sol and open source like Kimi/GLM/Deep-Seek, is you are getting *closer* so seeing a real application layer possible in a very intellectually difficult sandbox like public market investing. Nearly four years from GPT 3.5 demo, we still aren't there. We are still in the "AOL era" - too slow, not competent enough, too expensive. But are we exiting that era? It feels to me like we might be. If I had to guess, my guess is the frontier labs continue to be good businesses (and extremely volatile public stocks), mostly due to the reflexive nature of capital markets & talent acquisition. But what seems really obvious, to me, is that 2026-2036 is going to be the era of the application layer, where the Travis Kalanick-style entrepreneur takes this "intelligence pipe" and envisions new & groundbreaking businesses that change the world. That entrepreneurial accelerate will drive durable and accelerating demand for the intelligence pipe, it seems. It's a really exciting time to be alive.

• 
  Frogo (@Dubflip) reported 10 minutes ago

  @shakoistsLog At 11 I was phishing for passwords with an AOL login clone I made from a screenshot. Obscenities came well before that

• 
  the grundle bundler (@thebagofregret) reported 11 minutes ago

  what do you think is the earliest birth year of someone who has shared this exact problem dating back to AOL ****

• 
  kpmaloyauthor (@kpmaloyauthor) reported 13 minutes ago

  @NikoleCallihan I never had an AOL address. lol

• 
  Jordan “PseudoFinn” Wheatley ✝️🇻🇦🇺🇸🇫🇮 (@ThePseudoFinn) reported 13 minutes ago

  @LarryBundyJr Thank god for the fan-made Insignia Live online service as most of those update patches and DLC are now available to download and install again, though EA used their own servers for their own games and thus the online services for them can’t be revived by fans, at least not yet anyway. Also, there was DLC on Dreamcast and even roster updates for some of the Sega Sports titles, even though keeping the DLC on the VMUs while having room for game saves was very difficult due to the paltry 200 block (about 128 KB) storage limitations. Not only that, but there were also online services for the Intellivision and the Atari 2600, in the form of PlayCable and GameLine, respectively, with the latter of the two eventually restructuring itself into what is now AOL today.

• 
  Dennis Downs (@DennisDown94756) reported 14 minutes ago

  @PaulTerlizzi @Starlink AOL had these same issues and they started out at $4.95. Back when we could afford it !

• 
  $XRPARMY (@JoshMcKinney18) reported 16 minutes ago

  @Ripplesinwales They have no choice — adapt or get left behind. What we’re really watching is the same shift that hit the stock market in the late 90s. I jumped on E*TRADE right around the time AOL went mainstream in 1998. That was the moment the “do-it-yourself” crowd said forget the middleman (stock brokers) and moved to online trading. The ones who understood cut out the middle and kept more of the profit. The ones who didn’t just stayed with the old system. The exact same divide is unfolding again right now on the banking side — bank custody vs self-custody.

• 
  VMSwiderski (@VMSwiderski) reported 18 minutes ago

  @Ken_FiveSolas 19. Never did AOL.

• 
  Recon Number 54 (@Recon_Number_54) reported 20 minutes ago

  @NilesSankey The Bungie of my memories was (as you say) a once in a lifetime confluence of people and a particular time in the world. I remember when they were a "keyword" on AOL (before AOL had full Internet access, sort of like a link) and fans were also prevalent on UseNet. This time (and the decade after) was when the fans and the devs had such tight contact that everyone was "in on the joke" when The Webmaster, Disembodied Soul or other online "persona" would rib, tease, or outright insult gamers. Not as if they were family, because they WERE family. It was great while it lasted, but things inevitably change and more and more gamers started considering themselves "customers" and that Bungie should treat them as such ("the customer is always right" mantra for example). The playful and sometimes hardcore "back and forth" went away. The tight connection between the devs and their fans became customer service interactions with consumers. People were told "It's not 2004 anymore" and the fact is that they were right. The era had passed and something new/different had replaced everything. That carefree, brave, willing to take risks, adventurous outlook of a tightly knit team isn't something that can be forced and it isn't likely to survive current-day corporate culture. It's not 1994, 2004, or even 2014 anymore. But it WAS fun!

• 
  Curtis Hallstrom (@VSOGunChannel) reported 21 minutes ago

  @hannahhill_sc @right2bear E-forms goes down on Wednesdays for routine maintenance. Do you remember the AOL commercials? “ you’ve got mail” That’s what it’s like in Eforms, without any aesthetic forward thinking